Abstract
Innovation ecosystems are becoming increasingly important for the co-creation and modification of digital innovation by different and often competing organizational actors. However, how innovation ecosystems emerge between such organizational actors is yet unknown. This article addresses this gap by exploring how central organizational actors create innovation ecosystems, and how and why these innovation ecosystems emerge over time and through the interplay of all involved organizational actors that pursue both common (i.e., cooperate) and own goals (i.e., compete). To answer these questions, we opted for a single-case study of a large software development project, initiated by a major logistics company and implemented in collaboration with its independent IT department, six software vendors, and some field experts. This unique constellation with different coopeting (i.e., simultaneously cooperating and competing) organizational actors is particularly well suited to answer our research questions. Our results show that central organizational actors can create the basic structure and procedures of an innovation ecosystem. However, for an innovation ecosystem to progress in its emergence, central organizational actors need to stabilize the basic structure, while all other organizational actors need to help refine the basic procedures. The better adapted the structure and the procedures, the better organizational actors can exploit them to materialize coherent and customer-oriented digital innovation. We present our findings as a three-phase process model of innovation ecosystem emergence, in which innovation agency is distributed and redistributed among the organizational actors. Our findings have important implications for the literature on innovation ecosystems, the coopetition paradox, and digital innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The project manager was interviewed twice.
References
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107. https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821.
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (Vol. 1, pp. 204–228). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business networks—To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.015.
Block, R. (2007, January 9). Live from Macworld 2007: Steve Jobs keynote. Retrieved from https://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/live-from-macworld-2007-steve-jobs-keynote/.
Boudreau, K. J., & Haigu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163–191). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 466–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0869.
Davis, J. P. (2016). The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: Collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 621–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216649350.
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318923.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
Furr, N., & Shipilov, A. (2018). Building the right ecosystem for innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 59. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-the-right-ecosystem-for-innovation/.
Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18841-3.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Giudici, A., Reinmoeller, P., & Ravasi, D. (2017). Open-system orchestration as a relational source of sensing capabilities: Evidence from a venture association. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1369–1402. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0573.
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4%3C293:AID-SMJ982%3E3.0.CO;2-M.
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750.
Ho, H., & Ganesan, S. (2013). Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in competition? The role of customer participation. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0570.
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C217:aid-smj95%3E3.0.co;2-y.
Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. (2004). Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.002.
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199803)19:3%3C193:aid-smj949%3E3.0.co;2-c.
Lindgren, R., Eriksson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.8.
Lumineau, F., & Oliveira, N. (2018). A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 440–465. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0033.
Lunnan, R., & Haugland, S. A. (2008). Predicting and measuring alliance performance: A multidimensional analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0033.
Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.007.
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland, R. J., Jr. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093.
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Bagherzadeh, M. (2014). A review of interorganizational collaboration dynamics. Journal of Management, 0149206314563399, xxx. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538870.
Mantovani, A., & Ruiz-Aliseda, F. (2016). Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Science, 62(2), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2140.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75. https://hbr.org/1993/05/predators-and-prey-a-new-ecology-of-competition.
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in is research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.63886529.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in the digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03.
Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2013). Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organization Studies, 34(11), 1623–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612470230.
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118.
Pathak, S. D., Wu, Z., & Johnston, D. (2014). Toward a structural view of co-opetition in supply networks. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.04.001.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323.
Tjosvold, D., & Choy, W. (1994). Working with customers: Cooperation and competition in relational marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.1994.9964276.
Williamson, P. J., & de Meyer, A. (2012). Ecosystem advantage: How to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, 55(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.55.1.24.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hurni, T., Dibbern, J., Huber, T.L. (2020). Emerging Innovation Ecosystems: The Critical Role of Distributed Innovation Agency. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45818-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45819-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)