Skip to main content

The Differential Benefits of Cloud Computing for Small and Medium Versus Large Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Cloud computing is a fundamental shift in the way computing power is acquired and consumed. It is a special case of IS outsourcing where some IT-related tasks and resources are outsourced to cloud vendors. Cloud computing confers unique capabilities such as heterogeneity, scalability, accessibility, availability, consumption based pricing, fully managed and standardized services on the adopting organizations. These capabilities in-turn result in several strategic and operational benefits to the adopting organizations. However, these capabilities are not leveraged by all adopting firms uniformly. Firms utilize these capabilities based on their orientation towards exploration and exploitation. While SMEs are more aligned towards exploratory activities, large enterprises are inclined towards exploitation. Therefore, we posit that the SMEs and large enterprises accrue differential benefits from cloud adoption such that SMEs leverage cloud to attain strategic benefits and large enterprises seek operational benefits from cloud adoption. Through a survey based exploratory study we found that there is a systematic difference between SMEs and large enterprises in the way they leverage cloud capabilities. Based on the results, we deduce that managers of SMEs believe that they can use cloud computing for exploration and on the contrary, managers of large enterprises believe that they can use cloud computing for exploitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Scalability—Scalability is the ability of a system, network, or process to handle a growing amount of work in a capable manner or its ability to be enlarged to accommodate that growth.

References

  • Aljabre, A. (2012). Cloud computing for increased business value. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthes, G. (2010). Security in the cloud. Communications of the ACM, 53(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust, M., Griffith, A. F. R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., … Zaharia, M. (2009). Above the clouds: A berkeley view of cloud computing. In UC Berkeley Reliable Adaptive Distributed Systems Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, U., Ullah, I., & Ansari, S. (2010). Open source private cloud computing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(7), 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 459–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I. R., Demirkan, H., Kannan, P., Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2010). An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 13–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hofmann, P., & Jordan, J. (2010). Cloud Computing and Electricity: Beyond the utility model. Communications of the ACM, 53(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budrienė, D., & Zalieckaitė, L. (2012). Cloud computing application in small and medium-sized enterprises. Issues of Business & Law, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (2009). Historical reflections the rise, fall, and resurrection of software as a service. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 28–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-J., Kuo-Hsien, S., & Tsai, W. (2007). Competitive tension: The awareness-motivation-capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christauskas, C., & Miseviciene, R. (2012). Cloud-computing based accounting for small to medium sized business. Engineering Economics, 23(1), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creeger, M. (2009). CTO roundtable: Cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debruyne, M., Moenaertb, R., Griffinc, A., Hartd, S., Hultinke, E. J., & Robben, H. (2002). The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan, H., Kauffman, R. J., Vayghan, J. A., Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D., & Maglio, P. P. (2009). Service-oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M., & Smith, K. G. (2008). The Red Queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkee, D. (2010). Why cloud computing will never be free. Queue, 8(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, S. (2010). Cloud computing or software as a service—which makes the most sense for HR? Employment Relations Today, 36(4), 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., & Lu, S. (2008). Cloud computing and grid computing 360° compared. In Paper presented at the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE’08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, G., Kim, S., & Wakefield, R. L. (2012). Success factors for deploying cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 55(9), 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Géczy, P., Izumi, N., & Hasida, K. (2012). Cloudsourcing: Managing cloud adoption. Global Journal of Business Research (GJBR), 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, J. (2011). Cloud computing can simplify HIT infrastructure management. Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 65(8), 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodburn, M. A., & Hill, S. (2010). The Cloud Transforms Business Cloud is not the future—It’s now. It’s an enabling force for business evolution that goes beyond technology, allowing organizations to more efficiently and effectively reengineer the company’s corporate strategy. For transformative power, the new model is blue—As in “sky.”. Financial Executive, 26(10), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry Katzan, J. (2010). On an ontological view of cloud computing. Journal of Service Science, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, B., & Henderson, J. C. (2010). Preparing for the future: Understanding the seven capabilities of cloud computing. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(2), 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, B., & Henderson, J. C. (2012). Business value from clouds: Learning from users. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, E. (2009). What really is SOA. A comparison with cloud computing, Web 2.0, SaaS, WOA, Web Services, PaaS and others. White Paper, Soalib Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing, 56(4), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushida, K. E., Murray, J., & Zysman, J. (2011). Diffusing the cloud: Cloud computing and implications for public policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2013). Outsourcing business processes for innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2016). A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, N. (2009). Is cloud computing really ready for prime time? Computer, 42(1), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. P., & Chen, Q. (2009). The immediate impact of new product introductions on stock price: The role of firm resources and size. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial management & data systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the US airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mircea, M., Ghilic-Micu, B., & Stoica, M. (2011). Combining business intelligence with cloud computing to delivery agility in actual economy. Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies, 45(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S. C., & Mondal, A. (2011). Identification of a company’s suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding return on investment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(3), 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51(5), 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D. (2010). Securing elasticity in the cloud. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poslad, S. (2011). Ubiquitous computing: smart devices, environments and interactions, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Pavlou, P. A., Im, G., & Du, S. (2012). Interfirm IT capability profiles and communications for cocreating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (2012). Business models for strategy and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 55(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, D. M. (2019). Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT-associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 363–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero, L. M., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Lindner, M. (2008). A break in the clouds: Towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. S. (2011). Cloud computing: Architectural and policy implications. Review of Industrial Organization, 38(4), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youseff, L., Butrico, M., & Silva, D. D. (2008). Toward a unified ontology of cloud computing. In Paper presented at the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE ‘08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P., & Bogner, W. C. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 169–169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raijv Kishore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gunupudi, L.S.V., Kishore, R. (2020). The Differential Benefits of Cloud Computing for Small and Medium Versus Large Firms. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45819-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics