Skip to main content

Suffering Poverty: Towards a Global Recognitive Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poverty, Inequality and the Critical Theory of Recognition

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Poverty ((PPOV,volume 3))

  • 462 Accesses

Abstract

This paper explores the ways by which the theory of recognition, most particularly Honneth’s, can be utilized in the normative analysis of global poverty and inequality. Taking off from the idea that social justice is a relational virtue, the goal of which is the achievement of self-realization, the paper argues that global poverty possesses a subjective dimension. Often overlooked in global poverty studies and alleviation, such subjective dimension refers to the negative effects of poverty on the sense of self and identity of the global poor, including their loss of self-confidence, self-respect, and self-esteem. The paper, then, attempts to develop the notion of “global recognitive justice” by exploring the global analogues of the three principles of recognition namely love, respect, and esteem. In the final analysis, the paper argues that it is only through articulating the lived-experience of suffering can global poverty and inequality be properly understood as a case of social injustice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interestingly, Stephen Massey (1983) makes a distinction between respecting oneself subjectively and respecting oneself according to a more objective standard, between valuing oneself simpliciter and properly valuing oneself. The objective view of self-respect can be traced back to Kant who teaches that a person should treat himself and other human beings as an end in himself or themselves, that is, he should act according to the moral law. On the other hand, the subjective view of self-respect is based on the person’s valuation of himself on the basis of his conception of what is worthy, on his beliefs and attitudes about what he considers as valuable. See Stephen Massey, “Is Self-Respect a Moral or Psychological Concept?”, Ethics 93, no. 2: 246–261.

  2. 2.

    It cannot be denied, however, that there is a lack of consensus in the academic and policy literatures about what self-esteem is, thereby, hampering the supposed link between poverty and self-esteem. According to Emler (2001, 1), the division is between the idea that self-esteem is a generalized feeling about the self, on the one hand, and the view that self-esteem is the “sum of a set of judgments about one’s value, worthiness, and competence in various domains,” on the other hand.

  3. 3.

    In a study by Bankston and Zhou (2002 among immigrant adolescents with Asian descent) in the US, it is interesting to note that, despite having reported the lowest level of self-esteem , they performed well academically in schools. This should be treated with caution, though. According to the study, parenting plays an important role in the way children of Asian immigrants perform in American schools dominated by whites. Parents tend to put more pressure on their children to perform well in the school. See Carl Bankston and Min Zhou (2002), Being Well vs. Doing Well: Self-Esteem and School Performance among Immigrants and Nonimmigrant Racial and Ethnic Groups,” International Migration Review 36: 389–415.

  4. 4.

    Isn’t this universal love for humankind equivalent to respect since the basis of such globalized love is personhood? Not necessarily. The concept of “globalized” love is different from respect in that although both involve valuing others by virtue of their personhood, the former is not a mere intellectual commitment arising from a contemplation of an idea. The act of loving humanity, say loving the world’s poor, has a certain degree of attachment and concern for them not found in respect—the latter being characterized by a kind of emotional indifference (Wolff 2015, p. 190).

  5. 5.

    See also Honneth’s article on how recognition applies to international relations, that is, between states. He makes references to collective self-respect brought about by recognition of one state including its cultural productions and historical achievements. It is not, however, entirely clear how can this be connected to human rights. See Axel Honneth, “Recognition between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations,” in The i in we: Studies in the theory of recognition (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012).

References

  • Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankston, Carl, and Zhou Min. 2002. Being Well vs. Doing Well: Self-Esteem and School Performance Among Immigrants and Nonimmigrant Racial and Ethnic Groups. International Migration Review 36: 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00086.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, Elaine, and John Flint. 2015. Self-Esteem, Comparative Poverty and Neighborhoods, Research Paper No. 7. Living Through Change in Challenging Neighbourhoods: A Research Project Funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University. https://research.shu.ac.uk/cresr/living-through-change/documents/RP7_SelfEsteem.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles R. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations with New Afterword by the Author. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick, Joel. 2008. Development as Reform and Counter-Reform: Paths Travelled by Slum/Shack dwellers International. In Can NGOs Make a Difference?: The Challenge of Development Alternatives, ed. Anthony Bebbington, 316–333. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayabyab, Marc Jason. 2014, May 31. Hongkong Textbook Depicts Filipinos as ‘Domestic Helper’. http://globalnation.inquirer.net/105471/hong-kong-textbook-depicts-filipinos-as-domestic-helpers. Accessed 12 July 2018.

  • Chopp, Rebecca. 1986. The Praxis of Suffering. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Rosemary. 2009. More Than Just Coping: The Antecedents and Dynamics of Resilience in a Qualitative Longitudinal Study. Social Polity and Society 8 (1): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746408004636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Francis M., and Larry Minear. 1992. The Challenges of Famine Relief: Emergency Operations in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denier, Yvonne. 2007. Efficiency, Justice and Care: Philosophical Reflections on Scarcity in Health Care. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2004. Injustice, Violence, and Social Struggle: The Critical Potential of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 5 (1): 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568516042653549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, Monique. 2015. The Global Poor as Agents of Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (2): 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Beyond Redistributive Paradigm: What Philosophers Can Learn from Poor-Led Politics. In Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation, Studies in Global Justice, ed. Helmut P. Gaisbauer, Gottfired Schweigger, and Clemes Sedmark, vol. 4, 225–245. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1980. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, Nicholas. 2001. Self-esteem: The Costs and Causes of Self-worth. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, Ben, and Miles Hewstone. 2015. Psychological Perspectives on poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation/University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2003. Social Justice in the Age of identity Politics: Redistribution, recognition, and Participation. In Redistribution or Recognition: A Politico-Philosophical Exchange. Trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, and Christiane Wilke, 7–111. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudeman, Stephen. 1986. Economics as Culture: Models and Metaphors of Livelihood. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Anthropology of Economy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Patrick, and Kate Schick, eds. 2016. Recognition and Global Politics: Critical Encounters Between State and World. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heins, Volker. 2008. Realizing Honneth: Redistribution, Recognition, and Global Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 4 (2): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449620802194025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Redistribution as Recognition. In Redistribution or Recognition: A Politico-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 110–197. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Recognition and Justice: Outline of a Plural Theory of Justice. Acta Sociologica 47 (4): 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699304048668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Work and Recognition: A Redefinition. In The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Hans-Christoph am Busch and Christopher Zurn, 223–239. New York/Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, and Joel Anderson. 2005. Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition and Justice. In Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, ed. John Christman and Joel Anderson, 127–149. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2007. Recognizing Persons. In Dimensions of Personhood, ed. Arti Laitinen and Heikki Ikäheimo, 224–247. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Globalizing Love: On the Nature and Scope of love as form of Recognition. Res Publica 18 (1): 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-012-9182-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kildal, Nanna. 1998. The Social Bases of Self-Respect: A Normative Discussion of Politics Against Unemployment. Thesis Eleven 54: 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513698054000006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeri, Christian. 2010. Redistribution and Recognition: Rethinking N. Fraser’s Dualistic Model. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 10 (3): 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v10i3.307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. 2004. Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, Avisai. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Gayatri. 2013. Citizens and ‘Squatters’: The Contested Subject of Public Policy in Neoliberal Mumbai. Ethics and Social Welfare 7 (2): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2013.779007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter. 2009. Dispensable and Bare Lives: Coloniality and the Hidden Political/Economic Agenda of Modernity. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Knowledge 7 (2): 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, Deepa, et al. 2000a. Voices of the Poor, Can Anyone Hear Us? Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. Voices of the Poor, Crying out for Change. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 1995. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, and Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, and Rollock. 2011. Acculturation, Competence and Mental Health Among South Asian Students in the United States. Journal of Multicultural Counselling and Development 32 (3): 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2004.tb00366.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raluto, Reynaldo. 2012. The Constant Struggle to Become a Church of the Poor: Fifty Years after Vatican II. Tambara 29: 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999b. The Law of Peoples with ‘the Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyles, Diego Zavaleta. 2007. The Ability to go About Without Shame: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators of Shame and Humiliation. Oxford Development Studies 35 (4): 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, Yvette. 1999. Stereotypes in Schooling: Negative Pressures in the American Educational System. https://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/s_es/s_es_rosse_school_frameset.htm. Accessed 12 July 2018.

  • Sabini, John, and Maury Silver. 1997. In Defense of Shame: Shame in the Context of Guilt and Embarrassment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, Gottfried. 2014. Recognition Theory and Global Poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 10 (3): 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2014.969439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, Vandana. 2005. New Emperors, Old Clothes. https://theecologist.org/2005/jul/01/new-emperors-old-clothes. Accessed 3 July 2018.

  • Massey, Stephen J. 1983. Is Self-Respect a Moral or a Psychological Concept? Ethics 93 (2): 246–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/292432

  • Taylor, Charles. 1994. Politics of Recognition. In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. intro Amy Guttman, 25–74. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, June Price, and Ronda R. Dearing. 2002. Shame and Guilt. New York/London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2005. Human Development Report 2005. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Human Development Report 2014. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. David. 1999. Love as a Moral Emotion. Ethics 109 (2): 338–374. https://doi.org/10.1086/233898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Robert. 2014. The Shame of Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicot, Donald. 1965. The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Susan. 2015. The Variety of Values: Essays on Morality, Meaning and Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pilapil, R.D. (2020). Suffering Poverty: Towards a Global Recognitive Justice. In: Schweiger, G. (eds) Poverty, Inequality and the Critical Theory of Recognition. Philosophy and Poverty, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45795-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics