Skip to main content

Exaptation and Beyond: Multilevel Function Evolution in Biology and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Innovation Through Exaptation

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

Exaptation contributes significantly to evolution of entities ‘born and made’, but little has been written about differences and similarities in the way exaptation takes place in the artificial and natural world. We succinctly describe how such processes take place in the natural and artificial world and focus in particular on the dynamic effect between functional shift of a module of an organism (or artifact) and the resulting change at the level where selection occurs. We show that when exaptation is considered from a modular viewpoint, some of the differences that have plagued the analogy between natural and artificial evolution disappears.

A contribution to our chapter of the book ‘Understanding innovation through exaptation’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Natural Selection, simply and by itself, is potent to explain the maintenance or the further extension and development of favourable variations, which are at once sufficiently considerable to be useful from the first to the individual possessing them. But Natural Selection utterly fails to account for the conservation and development of the minute and rudimentary beginnings, the slight and infinitesimal commencements of structures, however useful those structures may afterwards become’ (Mivart 1871: 24).

  2. 2.

    Difficulties on theory is the title of Chap. VI of Darwin’s Origins of Species (1859).

  3. 3.

    For instance, according to Perry and Sander (2004) the presence of long ribs in early amphibians could suggest the early ‘preadaptation’ (exaptation) of the amphibian ancestors of amniotes to a fully terrestrial life.

  4. 4.

    The atlatl (Shea and Sisk 2010) and a number of much more recent weapons, including ballistas, catapults and crossbows also belong to this class of artifacts.

  5. 5.

    Arthur (2009) argues that new functions and corresponding artifacts typically originate from one of the following two channels: the discovery of a new phenomenon in science and technology, which activates the exploration of the possibilities inherent in the new phenomenon and eventually results in the design and development of new artifacts and processes; the expression of a need that drives the formulation of functions that subsequently are translated into new artifacts.

  6. 6.

    ‘In the turbojet case the historical records show how initially the necessary ‘preadapted’ functional modules came both from the aero-engines industry and from diverse and hardly related technological lineages. For instance, in 1936 Power Jets’ industrial partners were British Thompson-Houston, a manufacturer of heavy steam turbines for the electric industry, and Laidlaw, Drew and Company, a Scottish manufacturer of industrial burners’ (Carignani et al. 2019: 523).

  7. 7.

    The nature of ‘preadaptation’ is evident in the following technical report that explains how and why the battery was the critical functional module for the electric car that originated from the cell phone industry: ‘Designed to use commodity, 18650 form-factor, Li-ion cells, the Tesla Roadster battery draws on the progress made in Li-ion batteries over the past 15 years. Under the market pull of consumer electronics products, energy and power densities have increased while cost has dropped making Li-ion the choice for an electric vehicle. In the past, to achieve such a tremendous range for an electric vehicle it would need to carry more than a thousand kilograms of nickel metal hydride batteries. Physically large and heavy, such a car could never achieve the acceleration and handling performance that the Tesla Roadster has achieved. Due to their high energy density, Li-ion batteries have become the technology of choice for laptops, cell phones, and many other portable applications’ (Berdichevsky et al. 2006: 1).

References

  • Andriani P, Carignani G (2014) Modular exaptation: a missing link in the synthesis of artificial forms. Res Policy 43(8):1608–1620

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriani P, Cattani G (2016) Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: introduction to the special section. Ind Corp Change 25(1):115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriani P, Ali A, Mastrogiorgio M (2017) Measuring exaptation and its impact on innovation, search, and problem solving. Organ Sci 28(2):320–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barve A, Wagner A (2013) A latent capacity for evolutionary innovation through exaptation in metabolic systems. Nature 500:203–206

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Basalla G (1988) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdichevsky G, Kelty K, Straubel JB, Toomre E (2006) The tesla roadster battery system. Tesla motors report, August 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius J (2019) Exaptation at the molecular genetic level. Sci China Life Sci 62:437–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun C, Baudot A, Guénoche A, Jacq B (2004) The use of protein-protein interaction networks for genome wide protein function comparisons and predictions. In: Methods in proteome and protein analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 103–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1975) On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. Am Psychol 30:1103–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Carignani G (2016) On the origin of technology: the invention and evolution of the bow and arrow. In: Panebianco F, Serrelli E (eds) Understanding cultural traits, a multidisciplinary perspective on cultural diversity. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Carignani G, Cattani G, Zaina G (2019) Evolutionary chimeras: a Woesian perspective of radical innovation. Ind Corp Change 28(3):511–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattani G (2006) Technological pre-adaptation, speciation and emergence of new technologies: how corning invented and developed fiber optics. Ind Corp Change 15(2):285–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattani G (2008) Reply to Dew’s (2007) commentary: pre-adaptation, exaptation and technology speciation: a comment on Cattani (2006). Ind Corp Change 17(3):585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple CE, Brun C (2015) Redefining protein moonlighting. Oncotarget 6:16812–16813

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple CE, Robisson B, Spinelli L, Guien C, Becker E, Brun C (2015) Extreme multifunctional proteins identified from a human protein interaction network. Nat Commun 6:7412

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Constant EW (1980) The origins of Turbojet revolution. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuénot L (1914) Théorie de la préadaptation. Scientia 16:60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species, 1st edn. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Ramos A, Roig-Borrellas A, García-Melero A, López-Alemany R (2012) α-Enolase, a multifunctional protein: its role on pathophysiological situations. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:156795

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF, Brunet TDP, Linquist S, Gregory TR (2014) Distinguishing between “function” and “effect” in genome biology. Genome Biol Evol 6:1234–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco-Serrano L, Hernández S, Calvo A, Severi MA, Ferragut G, Pérez-Pons J, Piñol J, Pich Ò, Mozo-Villarias Á, Amela I et al (2018) MultitaskProtDB-II: an update of a database of multitasking/moonlighting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D645–D648

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11(4):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Graur D, Zheng Y, Azevedo RBR (2015) An evolutionary classification of genomic function. Genome Biol Evol 7:642–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402(6761 Suppl):C47–C52

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson B, Fares MA, Martin, AC (2016) Protein moonlighting and new thoughts about protein evolution. In: Protein moonlighting in biology and medicine. Wiley, pp 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson B, Fares MA, Martin ACR (2017) Protein moonlighting in biology and medicine. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin J (1998) Seven types of pleiotropy. Int J Dev Biol 42:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacq B (2001) Protein function from the perspective of molecular interactions and genetic networks. Brief Bioinform 2:38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery CJ (1999) Moonlighting proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 24:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery CJ (2014) An introduction to protein moonlighting. Biochem Soc Trans 42:1679–1683

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery CJ (2018) Protein moonlighting: what is it, and why is it important? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 373

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling DM, Garza P, Nartey CM, Carvunis A-R (2019) The meanings of “function” in biology and the problematic case of de novo gene emergence. Elife 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS (2010) Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Annu Rev Biochem 79:471–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimer A, Borenstein E, Gophna U, Ruppin E (2008) The evolution of modularity in bacterial metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(19):6976–6981

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard LM, Phillipson L (2010) Indications of bow and stone-tipped arrow use 64 000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Antiquity 84(325):635–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman RL, Van Pool TL, O’Brien MJ (2008) The diversity of North American projectile-point types, before and after the bow and arrow. J Anthropol Archaeol 28(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis L, Sagan D (2002) Acquiring genomes: a theory of the origins of species. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrearthy S (2012) Sharpening the mind. Nature 491:531–532

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mivart G (1871) On the genesis of species. MacMillian, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL (2002) Systems biology. Life’s complexity pyramid. Science 298:763–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose ET (1952) Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. Am Econ Rev 42(5):804–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry SF, Sander M (2004) Reconstructing the evolution of the respiratory apparatus in tetrapods. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 144:125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatigorsky J, Wistow GJ (1989) Enzyme/crystallins: gene sharing as an evolutionary strategy. Cell 57:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Plach MG, Reisinger B, Sterner R, Merkl R (2016) Long-term persistence of bi-functionality contributes to the robustness of microbial life through exaptation. PLoS Genet 12:e1005836

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1911) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea JJ, Sisk ML (2010) Complex projectile technology and Homo Sapiens dispersal into western Eurasia. Paleo-anthropology, 100–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle FJ, Doyle J (2004) Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118:675–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Takiguchi M, Matsubasa T, Amaya Y, Mori M (1989) Evolutionary aspects of urea cycle enzyme genes. BioEssays 10:163–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher AP (1929) A history of mechanical inventions. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (2012) The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation. Proc Biol Sci 279:1249–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A, Rosen W (2014) Spaces of the possible: universal Darwinism and the wall between technological and biological innovation. J R Soc Interface 11:20131190

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese CR (2002) On the evolution of cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(13):8742–8747

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Woese CR (2004) A new biology for a new century. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese CR, Goldenfeld N (2009) How the microbial world saved evolution from the Scylla of molecular biology and the Charybdis of the modern synthesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73(1):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanzoni A, Ribeiro DM, Brun C (2019) Understanding protein multifunctionality: from short linear motifs to cellular functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 76:4407–4412

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (2000) Technological innovation as an evolutionary process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinman GE, Zhong S, Bar-Joseph Z (2011) Biological interaction networks are conserved at the module level. BMC Syst Biol 5:134

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gino Cattani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andriani, P., Brun, C., Carignani, G., Cattani, G. (2020). Exaptation and Beyond: Multilevel Function Evolution in Biology and Technology. In: La Porta, C., Zapperi, S., Pilotti, L. (eds) Understanding Innovation Through Exaptation. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45784-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics