Skip to main content

Exaptation for the Good and the Bad: Regeneration and Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Innovation Through Exaptation

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

I discuss in this chapter the use of exaptation to create serendipity in an important biological process such as regeneration and in cancer. Regeneration is the capability to replace parts of the body lost after injury. As the immune system increases its complexity, this capacity decreases but, in the parts that are able to regenerate, we found a common signature between mammals and very distant organisms with high regenerative capacity such as Hydra, planaria and sea cucumber. On the other hand, tumour cells use the same genes related to Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) to become more prone to migrate and to acquire an aggressive phenotype. Finally, I will discuss how the era of “Big Data” is helping us to identify processes that use exaptation to create serendipity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agata K, Saito Y, Nakajima E (2007) Unifying principles of regeneration I: epimorphosis versus morphallaxis. Dev Growth Differ 49:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado A, Tsonis P (2006) Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat Rev Genet 7:873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easwaran H, Tsai HC1, Baylin SB (2014) Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol Cell 54:716–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Font Clos F, Zapperi S, La Porta C (2018) Topography of epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity. PNAS 115:5902–5907

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumagalli MR, Zapperi S, LaPorta C (2018) Regeneration in distantly related species common strategies and pathways. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-017-0042-z

  • Gilgenkrantz H, Collin de l’Hortety A (2018) Understanding liver regeneration from mechanisms to regenerative medicine. Am J Pathol 188:1316–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin JW (2014) The promise of perfect adult tissue repair and regeneration in mammals: learning from regenerative amphibians and fish. BioEssays 36:861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin JW, Rosenthal N (2014) Scar-free wound healing and regeneration in amphibians: immunological influences on regenerative success. Differentiation 87:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT, Geneve R (2010) Hartmann & Kester’s plant propagation: principles and practices, 8th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta CAM, Zapperi S (2017) Complexity in cancer stem cells and tumor evolution: towards precision medicine. Semin Cancer Biol 44:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta CAM, Zapperi S (2018) Explaining the dynamics of tumor aggressiveness: at the crossroads between biology, artificial intelligence and complex systems. Semin Cancer Biol 53:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk CW, Schuster C, Leyser O, Meyerowitz EM (2015) A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 25:1306–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mescher AL, Neff AW (2005) Regenerative capacity and the developing immune system. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 93:39–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Mescher AL, Neff AW, King MW (2017) Inflammation and immunity in organ regeneration. Dev Comp Immunol 66:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pibiri M, Sulas P, Leoni VP, Perra A, Kowalik MA, Cordella A, Saggese P, Nassa G, Ravo M (2015) Global gene expression profile of normal and regenerating liver in young and old mice. AGE 37:9796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulianmackal AJ, Kareem AVK, Durgaprasad K, Trivedi ZB, Prasad K (2014) Competence and regulatory interactions during regeneration in plants. Front Plant Sci 11. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00142

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddien PW, Alvarado SA (2004) Fundamentals of planarian regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:725–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellerio AL, Ciusani E, Bossel Ben-Moshe N, Coco S, Piccinini A, Myers CR, Sethna JP, Giampietro C, Zapperi S, La Porta CAM (2015) Overshoot during phenotypic switching of cancer cell populations. Sci Rep 5:15464

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert S, Farrell JA, Cazet JF, Abeykoon YL, Primack AS, Schnitzler CE, Juliano CE (2019) Stem cell differentiation trajectories in Hydra resolved at single-cell resolution 365:eaav9314

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinway SN, Zañudo JGT, Michel PJ, Feith DJ, Loughran TP, Albert R (2015) Combinatorial interventions inhibit TGFβ-driven epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and support hybrid cellular phenotypes. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 1, Article number: 15014

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R, Rascón CA, Tian S, Nie J, Barry C, Chu LF, Ardalani H, Wagner RJ, Probasco MD, Bolin JM, Leng N, Sengupta S, Volkmer M, Habermann B, Tanaka EM, Thomson JA, Dewey CN (2013) Comparative RNA-seq analysis in the unsequenced axolotl: the oncogene burst highlights early gene expression in the blastema. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1002936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang YJ, Nieto MA (2009) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139:871–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DE, Wang IE, Reddien PW (2011) Clonogenic neoblasts are pluripotent adult stem cells that underlie planarian regeneration. Science 332:811–816

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl GM, Spike BT (2017) Spike cell state plasticity, stem cells, EMT, and the generation of intra-tumoral heterogeneity. NPJ Breast Cancer 3:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Chen X, Chang C, Wang G, Wang W, Zhang L, Zhu Q, Wang L, Zhang F (2010) Transcriptome analysis of hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy in rats. Dev Genes Evol 220:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Sun L, Yuan J, Sun Y, Gao Y, Zhang L, Li S1, Dai H, Hamel JF, Liu C, Yu Y, Liu S, Lin W, Guo K, Jin S, Xu P, Storey KB, Huan P, Zhang T, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Lin C, Li X, Xing L, Huo D, Sun M, Wang L, Mercier A, Li F, Yang H, Xiang J (2017) The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration PLoSBiol 15:e2003790

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caterina AM La Porta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

La Porta, C.A. (2020). Exaptation for the Good and the Bad: Regeneration and Cancer. In: La Porta, C., Zapperi, S., Pilotti, L. (eds) Understanding Innovation Through Exaptation. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45784-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics