Advertisement

Towards Message-Driven Ontology Population - Facing Challenges in Real-World IoT

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1159)

Abstract

Large-scale Internet-of-Things (IoT) environments as being found in critical infrastructures such as Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) are characterized by (i) massive heterogeneity of data, (ii) prevalent legacy systems, and (iii) continuous evolution of operational technology. In such environments, the realization of crosscutting services demands a conceptual IoT representation, most promising, in terms of a domain ontology. Populating the ontology’s A-Box, however, faces some challenges, which are not sufficiently addressed by now. In this respect, the contribution of this short paper is three-fold: Firstly, in order to point out the complexity of addressed real-world IoT environments, we identify prevalent challenges for (semi-)automatic ontology population by means of a real world example. Secondly, in order to address these challenges, we elaborate on related work by identifying promising lines of research relevant for ontology population. Thirdly, based thereupon, we sketch out a solution approach towards message-driven ontology population.

Keywords

Internet-of-Things (Semi-)automatic ontology Intelligent Transportation Systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Appice, A.: Towards mining the organizational structure of a dynamic event scenario. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 50(1), 165–193 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Augusto, A., et al.: Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31(4), 686–705 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belkaroui, R. et al.: Towards events ontology based on data sensors network for viticulture domain. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Internet of Things, pp. 1–7. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Detro, S. et al.: Enhancing semantic interoperability in healthcare using semantic process mining. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Society and Technology, pp. 80–85 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endler, M. et al.: Towards stream-based reasoning and machine learning for IoT applications. In: Intelligent System Conference, pp. 202–209. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganino, G., et al.: Ontology population for open-source intelligence: a GATE-based solution. Softw. Pract. Exp. 48(12), 2302–2330 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graf, D., Kapsammer E., Schwinger W., Retschitzegger W., Baumgartner N.: Cutting a path through the IoT ontology jungle - a meta survey. In: International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligence Systems. IEEE (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graf, D., Retschitzegger W., Schwinger W., Kapsammer E., Baumgartner N., Pröll B.: Towards operational technology monitoring in intelligent transportation systems. In: International Conference on Management of Digital Eco-Systems. ACM (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jafari, M., et al.: Role mining in access history logs. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manag. Appl. 1, 258–265 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jayawardana, V. et al.: Semi-Supervised instance population of an ontology using word vector embeddings. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions, pp. 217–223. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin, T., et al.: Organizational modeling from event logs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, pp. 670–675. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, S., et al.: Dynamic data driven-based automatic clustering and semantic annotation for internet of things sensor data. Sens. Mater. 31(6), 1789–1801 (2019)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, F., et al.: Device-oriented automatic semantic annotation in IoT. J. Sens. 2017, 9589064:1–9589064:14 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lubani, M., et al.: Ontology population: approaches and design aspects. J. Inf. Sci. 45(4), 502–515 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matzner, M., Scholta, H.: Process mining approaches to detect organizational properties in CPS. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ni, Z., et al.: Mining organizational structure from workflow logs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Education, Entertainment and e-Management, pp. 222–225. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reyes-Ortiz, J., et al.: Web services ontology population through text classification. In: Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 491–495. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Der Aalst, W., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 169–194. Springer (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria
  2. 2.team GmbHViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations