Skip to main content
  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

Proponents of principlism advocate the employment of moral principles to resolve ethical dilemmas. A set of prima facie binding principles offered for use in biomedical ethics is a popular example of principlism. These principles include respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice; the requirements of these principles is discussed. A significant problem with principlism occurs when two respected relevant ethical principles conflict and we are unable to honor one without violating the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2009. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, K.Danner, and Bernard Gert. 1990. A Critique of Principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2): 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B., C.M. Culver, and K.D. Clouser. 2000. Common Morality Versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23: 308–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Madison. 2005. Bioethics as Politics: The Limits of Moral Expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Henry S. 2000. Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3): 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, Henk, and Helen Keasberry. 1992. Equity and Solidarity: The context of Health Care in the Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17: 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Tom. 2009. What Principlism Misses. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 229–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenar, Leif, John Rawls. 2019. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Spring 2017 ed., ed. N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/rawls/. Accessed April 11, 2019.

  • Wikipedia Contributors. A Theory of Justice. Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Theory_of_Justice&oldid=872354413. Accessed 27 December 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Steinberg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steinberg, D. (2020). Principlism. In: The Multidisciplinary Nature of Morality and Applied Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45680-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics