Abstract
This chapter first conceptualizes the phenomenon of “negative emotional engagement” (understood as unfavorable behavior toward organizations; see Lievonen et al., The handbook of communication engagement. Wiley, New York, 2018) and introduces a framework for assessing it in relation to city diplomacy and city branding. Second, we demonstrate that negative emotional engagement can have measurable positive outcomes. In the empirical section, we use a mixed-methods case study approach applying content and sentiment analysis to understand how mayoral messages from the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group cross the boundary to the ‘dark side’ by publicly discussing and criticizing President Trump’s decision to leave the Paris climate change agreement. The study illustrates recent phenomena of negative emotional engagement (Lievonen et al., The handbook of communication engagement. Wiley, New York, 2018) and new diplomatic functions of cities (city diplomacy) that leverage city branding. Social media messages and press releases show how mayors, citizens and associations engage with the issue of climate change through disapproving of policies, leading them to be more active in bringing about local changes. This study shows how negative emotional engagements tend to use the rhetoric of a common enemy to motivate people to take participative actions, thus also showing the positive aspects of city diplomacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acuto, M. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance, 19(3), 481–498.
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, M. R. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.
Arjun, M., Vivek, V., Bing, L., & Natalie, G. (2013, July 8). What yelp fake review filter might be doing. Paper presented at the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boston.
Balaji, M. S., Wei Khong, K., & Yee Loong Chong, A. (2016). Determinants of negative word-of-mouth communication using social networking sites. Information & Management, 53(4), 528–540.
Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world. Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Baumeister, R., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson.
Bloomberg, M., & Pope, C. (2017). Climate of hope: How cities, businesses, and citizens can save the planet. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Braun, E., Kavaratzis, M., & Zenker, S. (2013). My city – My brand: The different roles of residents in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 18–28.
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271.
Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114.
C40 Cities. (2019). C40 Cities. About. https://www.c40.org/about. Accessed 13 June 2019.
Canel, M.-J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2018). What is changing in public sector communication? In M.-J. Canel & V. Luoma-aho (Eds.), Public sector communication: Closing gaps between citizens and public organizations (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Capdevila, I., & Zarlenga, M. I. (2015). Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 266–282.
Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, S., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: Twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15, 78–96.
Dameri, R. P., & Ricciardi, F. (2015). Smart city intellectual capital: An emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 860–887.
Danesh, G. S. (2017). Putting engagement in its PRoper place: State of the field, definition and model of engagement in public relations. Public Relations Review, 43, 925–933.
Davidson, T., Warmsley Macy, D. M., & Weber, I. (2017, May 15–18). Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. Paper presented at the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Montréal.
Eshuis, J., & Edwards, A. (2013). Branding the city: The democratic legitimacy of a new mode of governance. Urban Studies, 50(5), 1066–1082.
Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2017). City branding as a governance strategy. In J. Hannigan & G. Richards (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new urban studies (pp. 92–105). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Eshuis, J., Klijn, E.-H., & Braun, E. (2014). Place marketing and citizen participation: Branding as strategy to address the emotional dimensions of policy making? International Review of Administration Sciences, 80(1), 151–171.
Finkelstein, S. R., & Fishbach, A. (2012). Tell me what I did wrong: Experts seek and respond to negative feedback. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 22–38.
Foust, C. R., & Hoyt, K. D. (2018). Social movement 2.0: Integrating and assessing scholarship on social media and movement. Review of Communication, 18(1), 37–55.
George, J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 1–45.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61–87.
Greenberg, M. (2008). Branding New York: How a city in crisis was sold to the world. New York: Routledge.
Haidt, J. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.
Harlow, S., & Harp, D. (2012). Collective action on the web: A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the United States and Latin America. Information Communication & Society, 15, 196–216.
Hodges, H. E., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: Environmental movements’ use of twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 223–247.
Hollebeek, L. D., & Chen, T. (2014). Exploring positively-versus negatively-valenced brand engagement: A conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(1), 62–74.
Hollenbeck, C. R., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2010). Anti-brand communities, negotiation of brand meaning, and the learning process: The case of Wal-Mart. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(3), 325–345.
Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2014, June 1–4). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor.
Jayne, M. (2011). From actor to avatar: The place of mayors in theories of urban governance. Geography Compass, 5(11), 801–810.
Jost, F., Dale, A., & Schwebel, S. (2019). How positive is “change” in climate change? A sentiment analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 96, 27–36.
Kavaratzis, M. (2009). Cities and their brands: Lessons from corporate branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(1), 26–37.
Kavaratzis, M., Giovanardi, M., & Lichrou, M. (2017). Inclusive place branding: Critical perspectives on theory and practice. Routledge.
Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(July), 92–109.
Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing places. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93–95.
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J. M., & De Boeck, P. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3(3), 254–269.
Lazzeri, F. (2014). On defining behavior: Some notes. Behavior and Philosophy, 42, 65–82.
Ledingham, J. A. (2001). Government-community relationships: Extending the relational theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 285–295.
Lievonen, M., & Luoma-aho, V. (2015). Ethical hateholders and negative engagement: A challenge for organizational communication. In A. Catellani, A. Zerfass, & R. Tench (Eds.), Communication ethics in a connected world (pp. 285–303). Brussels: Peter Lang.
Lievonen, M., Luoma-aho, V., & Bowden, J. (2018). Negative engagement. In K. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 531–548). New York: Wiley.
Lovari, A. (2013). Networked citizens. Comunicazione pubblica e amministrazioni digitali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Lukensmeyer, C. J., & Torres, L. H. (2008). Citizensourcing: Citizen participation in a networked nation. In K. Yang & E. Bergrud (Eds.), Civic engagement in a network society (pp. 207–233). Charlotte: Information age publishing.
Luoma-aho, V. (2015). Understanding stakeholder engagement: Faith-holders, hateholders & fakeholders. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 2(1), 1–28.
McEnery, T. (1994). The new city state. Change and renewal in America’s cities. Niwot: Roberts Rinehart.
McNeill, D. (2001). Embodying a Europe of the cities: Geographies of mayoral leadership. Area, 33(4), 353–359.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39, 13–22.
Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave.
Moser, S. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Review on Climate Change, 7, 345–369.
O’Neil, M., & Ackland, R. (2019). Risk issue adoption in an online social movement field. Information, Communication & Society, 1–20.
Park, C., & Lee, T. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67.
Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 135–149.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ribeiro, F. N., Araújo Gonçalves, M. P., Gonçalves, M. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2016). SentiBench – A benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, 5(23), 1–29.
Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2013). My anger is your gain, my contempt your loss: Explaining consumer responses to corporate wrongdoing. Psychology & Marketing, 30(12), 1029–1042.
Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1–23.
Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14(3), 197–215.
Sevin, H. E. (2014). Understanding cities through city brands: City branding as a social and semantic network. Cities, 38, 47–56.
Snieska, V., & Zykiene, I. (2015). City attractiveness for investment: Characteristics and underlying factors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213(1), 48–54.
Snow, D., Soule, S., & Kriesli, H. (2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden: Blackwell.
Stren, R., & Friendly, A. (2019). Big city mayors: Still avatars of local politics? Cities, 84, 172–177.
Stubbs, J., & Warnaby, G. (2015). Rethinking place branding from a practice perspective: Working with stakeholders. In M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, & G. Ashworth (Eds.), Rethinking place branding comprehensive brand development for cities and regions (pp. 101–118). New York: Springer.
Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384–398.
Taylor Buck, N., & While, A. (2017). Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK future cities initiative. Urban Studies, 54(2), 501–519.
Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 110–126.
Van der Pluijm, R., & Melissen, J. (2007). City diplomacy: The expanding role of cities in international politics. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Clingendael Diplomacy Papers, 10.
Van Dijk, P., & Holstein, A. N. (2007). How to brand a neighbourhood? Innovative citizen participation in urban planning. In G. Amos, & D. Warburton (Eds.), Community engagement in planning. Exploring the way forward. Final Report EU INTERREG IIIB Project.
Vanolo, A. (2017). City branding. The ghostly politics of representation in globalising cities. New York: Routledge.
Verhagen, T., Nauta, A., & Feldberg, F. (2013). Negative online word-of-mouth: Behavioral indicator or emotional release? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1430–1440.
Volkan, V. (1985). The need to have enemies and allies: A developmental approach. Political Psychology, 6(2), 219–247.
Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135.
Wang, J. (2006). Localising public diplomacy: The role of sub-national actors in Nation Branding. Place Branding, 2(1), 32–42.
We Are Still In. (n.d.). “We are still in” declaration. https://www.wearestillin.com/we-are-still-declaration. Accessed 07 June 2019.
Welsh, J., Fearn, D., Mackay, A., Sinclair, F., & Smart, T. (2008). Engagement: Public diplomacy in a globalised world. Foreign Commonwealth Office. https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u26739/Engagement_FCO.pdf. Accessed 07 June 2019.
Ye, L., & Björner, E. (2018). Linking city branding to multi-level urban governance in Chinese megacities: A case study of Guangzhou. Cities, 80, 29–37.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zenkler, S., & Beckman, S. C. (2013). My place is not your place – Different place brand knowledge by different target groups. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 6–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Asdourian, B., Ingenhoff, D. (2020). A Framework of City Diplomacy on Positive Outcomes and Negative Emotional Engagement: How to Enhance the International Role of Cities and City/Mayor Branding on Twitter?. In: Amiri, S., Sevin, E. (eds) City Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45614-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45615-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)