Skip to main content

Perception. Perceiving Space in Pictures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mind and Places

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 4))

  • 580 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout history, humans have used pictures to convey information about the three-dimensional layout of the environment and the volumetric structure of objects. There is little doubt that this form of visual communication can be useful practically (e.g. in technical drawings or maps) as well as aesthetically pleasing (e.g. in artistic paintings, prints, or photographs). Yet, pictures are two-dimensional, dimensionally limited, and constrained in intensity and chromaticity. By construction, visual information in pictures undersamples visual information available in the three-dimensional environment. This being the case, how can we perceive space in pictures? In this chapter, I propose a conceptual scheme for understanding visual information about space. The scheme is based on the concept of ambient optic array developed by J. J. Gibson, and on the key idea that information is available in space-time for an embodied moving observer. I then show how this scheme can be used to identify key differences between spatial perception in the actual environment and spatial perception in pictures. These differences provide useful insights into the spatial understanding of pictures, reveal the fundamental role of viewpoints in interpreting spatial ambiguity, and identify overlooked factors affecting aesthetic experience in perspective and art.

English version of the chapter provided by the Author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM76hK3N8Gg.

References

  • Banaei M, Hatami J, Yazdanfar A, Gramann K (2017) Walking through architectural spaces: the impact of interior forms on human brain dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci 11:477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno N, Pavani F (2018) Perception: a multisensory perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese O (2011) L’arte del Trompe l’Oeil. Jaca Book, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M (2019) Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. LEUKOS 15(2–3):203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Vinci, L. (2008). Notebooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (first edition 1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis W (2017) Visuality and virtuality: images and pictures from prehistory to perspective. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroualle D, Borel L, Devèze A, Lope C (2015) Changing perspective: the role of vestibular signals. Neuropsychologia 79:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton SY (1975) The Renaissance rediscovery of linear perspective. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti G (2016) Visual feeling of presence. Pac Philos Q 12170:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gîbacia F (2012) Evaluation of cognitive effort in the perception of engineering drawings as 3D models. In: ACHI 2012: The fifth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions. IARIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R (1970) The intelligent eye. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermund A, Klint LS (2016) Virtual and physical architectural atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the international conference on architecture, landscape and built environment (ICALBE 2016), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, New Zealand Academy of Applied Research Ltd., pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermund A, Bundgaard TS, Klint LS (2017) Speculations on the representation of architecture in virtual reality: how can we (continue to) simulate the unseen? Paper presented at Back to the future: the next 50 years—51st international conference of the Architectural Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermund A, Klint LS, Bundgaard TS (2018) The perception of architectural space in reality, in virtual reality, and through plan and section drawings: a case study of the perception of architectural atmosphere. In: Kepczynska-Walczak A, Bialowsky S (eds) Computing for a better tomorrow: eCAADe, vol 36. Poland, pp 735–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann DD, Singh M, Prakash C (2015) The interface theory of perception. Psychon Bull Rev 22(6):1480–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HR, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC (2016) The neural basis of depth perception from motion parallax. Phil Trans R Soc B 371:20150256

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy M (1988) The psychology of perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge University Pess, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrey S, Doeller C, Berthoz A, Burgess N (2012) Imagining being somewhere else: neural basis of changing perspective in space. Cereb Cortex 22(1):166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massironi M (2002) The psychology of graphic images. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Massironi M, Savardi U (1991) The ceiling of the Church of St Ignatius and the perception of concave surfaces. Perception 20(6):771–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar B (2006) The conflicted character of picture perception. J Aesthetics Art Criticism 64(4):471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muto H, Matsushita S, Morikawa K (2018) Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 44(3):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paes D, Arantes E, Irizarry J (2017) Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems. Autom Constr 84:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel R (2017) The duality of picture perception and the robustness of perspective. Art Percept 5(3):233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker AJ (2019) Stereopsis and depth perception. Oxfod Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker AJ, Cumming BG (2001) Cortical mechanisms of binocular stereoscopic vision. In Casanova C, Pitito M (eds.) Progress in Brain Research, vol 134. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosinski RR, Mulholland T, Degelman D, Farber J (1980) Picture perception: an analysis of visual compensation. Percep Psychophys 28(6):521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleeb N (2015) Effects of the differences between virtual and physical perception of space on building information modelling. WIT Trans Built Environ 149:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze U (2010) Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review. J Inf Technol 25:434–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technical Committee ISO/TC10 (2003) Technical drawings—general principles of presentation. ISO 128-1, 20–25, 30, 34, 40, 44, 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D (2014) Toward a new theory of stereopsis. Psychol Rev 121:151–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2005) Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nat Neurosci 8(10):1401–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade NJ, Hughes P (1999) Fooling the eyes: trompe l’oeil and reverse perspective. Perception 28(9):1115–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Wu P, Wang J, Wang X (2018) A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welchman AE (2016) The human brain in depth: how we seen in 3D. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2:345–376

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Bruno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bruno, N. (2020). Perception. Perceiving Space in Pictures. In: Anzani, A. (eds) Mind and Places. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45566-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45566-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45565-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45566-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics