Skip to main content

History and Fundamentals of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology in Practical Dermatology

Abstract

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a useful diagnostic non-invasive tool for skin tumours and inflammatory diseases.

In this chapter, a review of the history of RCM from its discovery to nowadays is done, and an explanation of its main physical principles is given in order to enable the dermatologist to understand the background of the technique and reach a better interpretation of the images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Minsky M. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning. 1988;10(4):128–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Egger MD, Petran M. New reflected-light microscope for viewing unstained brain and ganglion cells. Science. 1967;157(3786):305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajadhyaksha M, Grossman M, Esterowitz D, Webb RH, Anderson RR. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: Melanin provides strong contrast. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;104(6):946–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson B, Rajadhyaksha M, Abeytunge S. Fundamentals of reflectance confocal microscopy. In: González S, editor. Reflectance confocal microscopy of cutaneous tumors. 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2017. p. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rajadhyaksha M, González S, Zavislan JM, Anderson RR, Webb RH. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: Advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113(3):293–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauermann K, Clemann S, Jaspers S, et al. Age related changes of human skin investigated with histometric measurements by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajadhyaksha M, Gonzalez S, Zavislan JM. Detectability of contrast agents for confocal reflectance imaging of skin and microcirculation. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9(2):323–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tannous Z, Torres A, González S. In vivo real-time confocal reflectance microscopy: a noninvasive guide for Mohs micrographic surgery facilitated by aluminum chloride, an excellent contrast enhancer. Dermatologic Surg. 2003;29(8):839–46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karen JK, Gareau DS, Dusza SW, Tudisco M, Rajadhyaksha M, Nehal KS. Detection of basal cell carcinomas in Mohs excisions with fluorescence confocal mosaicing microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(6):1242–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolm I, Braun RP. How reflectance confocal microscopy works. In: Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Pellacani G, Malvehy J, Peter Soyer H, editors. Reflectance confocal microscopy for skin diseases: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glazowski C. Optimal detection pinhole for lowering speckle noise while maintaining adequate optical sectioning in confocal reflectance microscopes. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17(8):085001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vitkin IA, Woolsey J, Wilson BC, Anderson RR. Optical and thermal characterization of natural (Sepia officinalis) Melanin. Photochem Photobiol. 1994;59(4):455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gareau DS, Patel YG, Rajadhyaksha M. Basic principles of reflectance confocal microscopy. In: González S, Gill M, Halpern AC, editors. Reflectance confocal miscroscopy of cutaneous tumors. An atlas with clinical, dermoscopic and histological correlations. London: Informa Healthcare; 2008. p. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonasson H, Fredriksson I, Bergstrand S, Östgren CJ, Larsson M, Strömberg T. In vivo characterization of light scattering properties of human skin in the 475- to 850-nm wavelength range in a Swedish cohort. J Biomed Opt. 2018;23(12):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wurm EMT, Kolm I, Ahlgrimm-Siess V. A hands-on guide to confocal imaging. In: Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Pellacani G, Malvehy J, Soyer HP, editors. Reflectance confocal microscopy for skin diseases. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 11–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wurm EMT, Kolm I, Ahlgrimm-Siess V. A hands-on guide to confocal imaging. In: Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Pellacani G, Malvehy J, Soyer HP, editors. Reflectance confocal microscopy for skin diseases. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Witkowski AM, Łudzik J, Arginelli F, Bassoli S, Benati E, Casari A, et al. Improving diagnostic sensitivity of combined dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy imaging through double reader concordance evaluation in telemedicine settings: a retrospective study of 1000 equivocal cases. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Łudzik J, Witkowski AM, Roterman-Konieczna I, Bassoli S, Farnetani F, Pellacani G. Improving diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopically equivocal pink cutaneous lesions with reflectance confocal microscopy in telemedicine settings: double reader concordance evaluation of 316 cases. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman EE, Semeere A, Osman H, Peterson G, Rajadhyaksha M, González S, et al. Smartphone confocal microscopy for imaging cellular structures in human skin in vivo. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(4):1906–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sahu A, Yélamos O, Iftimia N, Cordova M, Alessi-Fox C, Gill M, et al. Evaluation of a combined reflectance confocal microscopy-optical coherence tomography device for detection and depth assessment of basal cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1175–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards SJ, Osei-Assibey G, Patalay R, Wakefield V, Karner C. Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy using VivaScope for detecting and monitoring skin lesions: a systematic review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42(3):266–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Encabo, B., Segurado, G., González, S. (2020). History and Fundamentals of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy. In: Fimiani, M., Rubegni, P., Cinotti, E. (eds) Technology in Practical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45351-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45351-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45351-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics