Skip to main content

“We Would Never Have Made That Story”: How Public-Powered Stories Challenge Local Journalists’ Ideas of Newsworthiness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
News Values from an Audience Perspective

Abstract

This chapter investigates how local journalists reconsider their ideas of newsworthiness while adapting an audience-driven approach to journalism. It is based on qualitative in-depth interviews with 13 journalists working for three local newsrooms in the Netherlands, two of them working with Hearken and one of them working with crowdsourcing. The findings show that “public-powered” stories challenge traditional news values, in particular recency, prominence and conflict. Audiences appear to be mainly interested in solution-oriented stories and have a preference for specific topics such as nature and local history. In dealing with participating audiences, journalists retain their gatekeeping role by filtering audience input lacking novelty or surprise, input that does not fit the format requirements of the medium, and questions with an underlying commercial or political agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    These three newsrooms were deliberately selected because they were local and highly proactive in audience collaboration. Initially, we selected the two Dutch newsrooms using the Hearken-tool. Secondly, for the sake of comparison, we decided to include a third local newsroom that was active around audience collaboration by making use of other methods.

  2. 2.

    One of those reporters at Omroep West was also ‘Hearken coordinator’.

  3. 3.

    The fieldnotes of the Facebook Live meetings were not directly included in the data analysis, but as contextual information they have contributed to the interpretation of the interview data.

  4. 4.

    Whether it is called “recency” (Bell 1991), “timeliness ” (Caple and Bednarek 2016), “currency” (Conley and Lamble 2006) or “topicality” (Brighton and Foy 2007).

  5. 5.

    Not to confuse with recency, which is more about temporal aspects of newsnewss.

  6. 6.

    In Dutch, the words newsworthiness and curiosity are more alike, namely “nieuwswaardig” and “nieuwsgierig”.

  7. 7.

    While ethnographic research emphasizes the importance of such “content-hidden” news values (Bell 1991), others prefer to set them apart as “selection factors” and to reserve the term news values for “the ‘newsworthy’ aspects of actors, happenings and issues ” (Caple and Bednarek 2016, p. 4).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boesman, J., Costera Meijer, I., Kuipers, M. (2021). “We Would Never Have Made That Story”: How Public-Powered Stories Challenge Local Journalists’ Ideas of Newsworthiness. In: Temmerman, M., Mast, J. (eds) News Values from an Audience Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45046-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics