Skip to main content

Arctic Economies Between Geopolitical Tensions and Provision of Livelihoods: Insights from the ECONOR Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1123 Accesses

Part of the book series: Frontiers in International Relations ((FIR))

Abstract

We present results from the Economy of the North (ECONOR) projects on the circumpolar Arctic economy and socio-economic conditions, as economic background for studies of geopolitical challenges of the Arctic. The ECONOR reports describe how the economy and livelihoods in the Arctic are conditioned by the global economy and climate change, and gives overviews of the regional Arctic economies, with economic and socio-economic indicators, gross regional product and disposable income of households. This can give a background for understanding how the resource wealth of the Arctic and differences in policy and institutions shape the Arctic economy and socio-economic outcomes and conditions for sustainability. We describe how the ECONOR approach gives insight into the economic background for geopolitical interest in the Arctic, given the abundance of natural resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not available for Arctic regions in Finland and Sweden as national data on infant mortality are no longer regionalized.

References

  • ACIA. (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AHDR. (2004). Arctic human development report. Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaska Department of Fish and Game. (2017). Subsistence in Alaska: A year 2017 update. Division of Subsistence, Alaska Department of Fish and Game. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/subsistence/pdfs/subsistence_update_2017.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • AMAP. (2002). Arctic monitoring and assessment programme (AMAP), Arctic pollution 2002. Oslo: AMAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP. (2011). Arctic monitoring and assessment programme (AMAP): Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA): Climate change and the cryosphere. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Council. (2013). Arctic resilience interim report 2013. Stockholm: Environment Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T., Rogers, G., & Rowley, G. (1978). The circumpolar north. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • BP. (2016). BP statistical review of world energy. June 2016, 65th edition. http://oilproduction.net/files/especial-BP/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-full-report.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2020.

  • Degteva, A., Oskal, A., Mathiesen, S. D., Burgess, P., Aslaksen, I., Johnsen, K. I., et al. (2017). Indigenous peoples’ perspectives (Chap. 7). In Adaptation actions for a changing Arctic: Perspectives from the Barents area (pp. 167–194). Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhaime, G., Caron, A., Lévesque, S., Lemelin, A., Mäenpää, I., Nigai, O., & Robichaud, V. (2017). Social and economic inequalities in the circumpolar Arctic (Chap. 2). In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 11–23). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA. (2013). Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fall, J. A. (2014). Subsistence in Alaska: A year 2012 update. Division of Subsistence, Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glomsrød, S., & Aslaksen, I. (Eds.). (2006). The economy of the north. Statistical analyses (SA) 84. Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/artikler-og-publikasjoner/the-economy-of-the-north–42376. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Glomsrød, S., & Aslaksen, I. (Eds.). (2009). The economy of the north 2008. Statistical analyses (SA) 112. Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/artikler-og-publikasjoner/the-economy-of-the-north–42376. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Glomsrød, S., Duhaime, G., & Aslaksen, I. (Eds.). (2017). The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151. Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/artikler-og-publikasjoner/the-economy-of-the-north–42376. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Gordon Foundation. (2015). Rethinking the top of the world: Arctic public opinion survey (Vol. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holen, D. (2009). The dynamic context of cultural and social sustainability of communities in Southwest Alaska. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 3, 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holen, D. (2017). Subsistence in Alaska. In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 90–96). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovelsrud, G. K., Poppel, B., van Oort, B., & Reist, J. D. (2011). Arctic societies, cultures, and peoples in a changing cryosphere. Ambio, 40, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry (ICR). (2019a). https://reindeerherding.org/what-is-reindeer-husbandry. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry (ICR). (2019b). https://reindeerherding.org/sami-norway. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • IPCC. (2013). United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), working group II. WGII. 2013 (Chapter 28:3, Fifth Assessment Report, AR5). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Larsen, J. N., & Fondahl, G. (Eds.). (2014). Arctic human development report II. Regional processes and global linkages. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholt, L. & Glomsrød, S. (2017). Arctic petroleum extraction under climate policies (Chap. 5). In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 79–84). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäenpää, I., Glomsrød, S., & Wei, T. (2017). Comparative analysis of Arctic economies at macro level (Chap. 3). In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 27–33). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, M. (2010). Pipeline dreams, people, environment, and the Arctic energy frontier. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, M., Burkes, F., Forbes, B. C., Kofinas, G., Vlasova, T., & Wenzel, G. (2005). Hunting, herding, fishing and gathering. In Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppel, B. (Ed.). (2015). SLiCA: Arctic living conditions. Living conditions and quality of life among Inuit, Sami and indigenous peoples of Chukotka and the Kola Peninsula (426 pp., TemaNord 2015:501). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2015-501.

  • Poppel, B., Kruse, J., Duhaime, G., & Abryutina, L. (2007). SLiCA results. Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage. www.arcticlivingconditions.org. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Rasmussen, R. O. (Ed.). (2011). Analyzing megatrends (TemaNord 2011:527). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. http://library.arcticportal.org/1526/1/Te-maNord2011-527_Megatrends.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Siegstad, M. O., & Fægteborg, M. (2016). Ajorpoq—vi får ingen svar! https://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Files/Attached%20Files/Formandens%20Departement/Puljemidler/Ajorpoq%20Kuannersuit.pdf. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • Turi, E. I. (2016). State steering and traditional ecological knowledge in Reindeer Herding Governance: Cases from western Finnmark, Norway and Yamal, Russia (PhD thesis). Umeå University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turi, E. I. (2017). Sámi reindeer pastoralism in Norway—Governance and economy. In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 108–114). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS. (2008). Fact sheet 2008-3049. Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic circle. http://energy.usgs.gov/Arctic. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • USGS. (2012). Fact sheet 2012-3042. An estimate of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources of the world. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3042. Accessed December 1, 2019.

  • van Rooij, W., Aslaksen, I., Burgess, P., Garnåsjordet, P. A., & Mathiesen, S. D. (2017). Ecological change in Arctic regions—A GLOBIO3 pilot study of impacts on biodiversity (Chap. 9). In S. Glomsrød, G. Duhaime, & I. Aslaksen (Eds.), The economy of the north 2015. Statistical analyses (SA) 151 (pp. 149–162). Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements for the Co-Authors of the ECONOR Report

This chapter draws upon material and text developed by many co-authors of the ECONOR reports and the circumpolar ECONOR network. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged, and their names are found in the ECONOR reports. In particular, we acknowledge the contributions to the results presented in this book chapter by Mads Fægteborg, Mia Olsen Siegstad, Hunter T. Snyder, Wilbert van Rooij, Ellen Inga Turi, and Taoyuan Wei.

Acknowledgment for Funding and Other Support The ECONOR reports are made for the Arctic Council Sustainable Development Working Group (SDWG), and the work is lead by Norway, co-lead by Canada, USA and Saami council, and funded by Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Nordic Council of Ministers, with support from the participating institutions, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP) and Research Council of Norway. Data and results are made possible through extensive cooperation of the circumpolar ECONOR network of statisticians and researchers. Funding, support and other contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iulie Aslaksen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glomsrød, S. et al. (2020). Arctic Economies Between Geopolitical Tensions and Provision of Livelihoods: Insights from the ECONOR Approach. In: Weber, J. (eds) Handbook on Geopolitics and Security in the Arctic. Frontiers in International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45005-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics