Skip to main content

Towards a Convergence of Institutional Structures for Sustainable Development?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter seven studies the constellations of actors dealing with policy coherence in France, the UK and Germany. The analysis demonstrates that international knowledge circulation has contributed to incremental institutional change at the national level. The analysis also shows that the institutional translation of the PCD idea differs across the three countries. It identifies the French Interministerial Committee for International Cooperation and Development and the German PCD Unit within the German Ministry for International Cooperation and Development as two forms of—centralized versus decentralized—corporative national policy entrepreneurs. The analysis demonstrates that variations in political priorities, instruments and modes of interaction can be traced back to pre-existing structural settings and policy environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • AA, & Bmz. (2012). For a coherent German government policy towards fragile states—Interministerial guidelines. Bonn, Berlin: AA and BMZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • AFD. (2006). Rapport d’ativité AFD 2005. Paris: Agence Francaise de développement. AFD.

    Google Scholar 

  • AFD. (2014). Bilan 2013 des activités d’évaluation à l’AFD. Paris: AFD.

    Google Scholar 

  • AFD. (2016). Rapport d’ativité AFD 2015. Notre action sur le terrain. Paris: Agence Francaise de développement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashoff, G. (2005). Enhancing policy coherence for development: Justification, recognition and approaches to achievement. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., Corcaci, A., & Doser, J. W. (2016). Unravelling multilevel administration: Patterns and dynamics of administrative co-ordination in European governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 999–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMZ. (2001). Aktionsprogramm 2015 Armut bekämpfen. Gemeinsam handeln. Der Beitrag der Bundesregierung zur weltweiten Halbierung extremer Armut (No. 106). BMZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung. (2002). Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Perspektiven für Deutschland. Berlin: Deutsche Bundesregierung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung. (2004). Aktionsplan „Zivile Krisenprävention, Konfliktlösung und Friedenskonsolidierung“. Bonn, Berlin: BMZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung. (2012). Nationale Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie · Fortschrittsbericht 2012. Berlin: Deutsche Bundesregierung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung. (2016). Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Neuauflage 2016. Berlin: Deutsche Bundesregierung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Pirzadeh, A., & Popescu, D. (2011). Institutional learning and knowledge transfer across epistemic communities: New tools of global governance (2012th ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, P., & Common, R. (2013). Policy transfer and learning in public policy and management: International contexts, content and development. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Centre de crise. (2012). Rapport d’activité sur l’action humanitaire d’urgence 2011. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre de crise. (2013). Rapport d’activité sur l’action humanitaire d’urgence 2012. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre de crise. (2014). Rapport d’activité sur l’action humanitaire d’urgence 2013. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre de crise. (2015). Rapport d’activité sur l’action humanitaire d’urgence 2014. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre de crise. (2016). Centre de crise et de soutien. Paris: Centre de Crise et de Soutien. Ministère Des Affaires Étrangères et Du Développement International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, L. (2013). The nature of policy change and implementation. OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNDSI. (2014). The national council for development and international solidarity (CNDSI). France Diplomatie, Paris: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortell, A. P., & Davis, J. W. (2000). Understanding the domestic impact of international norms: A research agenda. International Studies Review, 2(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Décret n° 2003-145 du 21 février 2003 portant création du comité interministériel pour le développement durable, 2003-145 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Décret n° 2014-400 du 16 avril 2014 relatif aux attributions du ministre des affaires étrangères et du développement international, 2014-400 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Décret n° 2016-242 du 3 mars 2016 relatif aux attributions déléguées au secrétaire d’Etat chargé du développement et de la francophonie, 2016-242 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcour, L., & Tulmets, E. (Eds.). (2019). Policy transfer and norm circulation: Towards an interdisciplinary and comparative approach (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID. (2010). Building peaceful states and societies (A DFID Practice Paper). London: UK Aid, UK Government, HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • DGM, & MAE. (2013). Mémorandum de la France sur ses Politiques de Coopération. MAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FCO, MOD, & DFID. (2013). Conflict pool strategic guidance. April 2013. HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCO, MOD, DFID, & Stabilisation Unit. (2014). The UK government’s approach to stabilisation (2014). London: Stabilisation Unit, HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • GKKE. (2010). Mehr Kohärenz, aber mit welchem Ziel? (Neunter GKKE-Bericht Zur Kohärenten Armuts- Bekämpfung in Der Deutschen Entwicklungspolitik). Berlin: GKKE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement francais. (2013). Who does what in France as regards the European Union? France Diplomatie: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development. Diplomatie. Gouvernement. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement francais. (2016). Sécretaire d’Etat auprès des Affaires etrangères et du développement international, chargé du développement et de la Francophonie. Paris: Gouvernement Français.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M., & Haas, E. B. (2008). Learning to learn: Improving international governance. In P. M. Haas (Ed.), International environmental governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2002). International Development Act 2002. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2014). OECD DAC peer review of the UK 2014 memorandum by the UK February 2014. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2015). National security strategy and strategic defence and security review 2015. A secure and prosperous United Kingdom. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2016). Cabinet Committees. HM Government London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. The American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAI. (2012). Evaluation of the inter-departmental conflict pool. London: ICAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, K., & Christopoulos, D. (2016). The networks of political entrepreneurs: A case study of Swiss Climate Policy. In I. N. Aflaki, E. Petridou, & L. Miles (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship (pp. 17–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International organizations and lifelong learning from global agendas to policy diffusion. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevenhörster, P. (2013). Entwicklungshilfe auf dem Prüfstand: Entwicklungspolitische Bilanzen führender Geberstaaten (1st ed.). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (2013). Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, causes and empirical findings. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S. (1994). Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(2), 279–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAE. (2012). Stratégie humanitaire de la République Francaise. Paris: Ministry of Defense. Diplomatie. Gouvernement.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAE. (2013). French institutional assistance mechanism. Paris: Diplomatie. Gouvernement.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAEE. (2011). Coopération au développement: Une version francaise. Document cadre. Paris: Diplomatie. Gouvernement.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEF. (2011). Directorate general of the treasury (Annual report 2010). Paris: MEF, Tresor.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOD. (2014). Joint Doctrine Publication 05 shaping a stable world: The military contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/DAC. (2005). DAC peer review Germany. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/DAC. (2008). France DAC peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, DAC. (2010a). Germany DAC peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, DAC. (2010b). United Kingdom DAC peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, DAC. (2013). DAC France peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/DAC (Ed.). (2014). United Kingdom DAC peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, DAC. (2015). Germany DAC peer review. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premier Ministre. (2003). Stratégie Nationale de Développement Durable 2003–2008. CIDD. http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/SNDD_Web_sticker_rose.pdf.

  • Premier Ministre. (2010). Stratégie Nationale de Développement Durable 2010—2013. CIDD. http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/SNDD_Web_sticker_rose.pdf.

  • Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change an advocacy coalition framework. Science Communication, 8(4), 649–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-secision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SGAE. (2011). Le SGAE. Paris: SGAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabilisation Unit UK. (2014). Stabilisation (CSSF Thematic Information Paper (TIP) 1809 14). London: UK Stabilisation Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P., & Brown, K. (2007). Greater than the sum of its parts? Assessing “whole of government” approaches to fragile states. Washington, DC: CGDEV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & deLeon, P. (2011). A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Zeigermann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zeigermann, U. (2020). Towards a Convergence of Institutional Structures for Sustainable Development?. In: Transnational Policy Entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44893-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics