Skip to main content

Psychomotor Skill Development: Learning What and How To Do

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

Abstract

Effective self-management of a person’s health condition requires more than simply knowing about the health condition. A patient will learn about their condition, acquiring knowledge, but will also need specific skills that require motor control in combination with understanding. Examples of psychomotor skills a patient with a respiratory condition may be required to develop include the ability to take peak flow readings or learning to use a dry powder inhaler. ‘See one, do one’ is not appropriate for educating patients to perform these complex self-management procedures. The interaction between the patient, the task and goal of the movement, and the environment in which the movement is completed must inform the approach to teaching a person a new skill. Considerations for healthcare professionals includes the stage of learning, the memory and cognitive load, the context of learning, whether learning is explicit or implicit, whether the attention is external or internal, and how feedback is given. Subsequently, learning psychomotor skills requires more innovative teaching methods, as psychomotor skills require both a psychology/knowledge component, as well as a motor component, compared to knowledge learning alone. In this chapter, we will explore the theory relevant to the direct clinical context of supporting a patient to learn how to use a dry powder inhaler. The chapter provides the theoretical background for motor learning and underpins the scientific literature explored in Chap. 13, Teaching the practical skill of correct inhaler use: Knowing and being able to do. Understanding the processes involved in learning and subsequently performing psychomotor skills will enable healthcare professionals to better plan and deliver appropriate learning experiences for patients that positively impact on their abilities to self-manage their chronic respiratory condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams JA. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav. 1971;3:111–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JR. Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychol Rev. 1987;94:192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman MG. In search of decay in verbal short term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009;35(2):317–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Molero-Sanchez A, Carratala-Tejadaa M, Alguacil-Diego IM, Molina-Reda F, Miangolarra-Pages JC, Torricellid D. Theories and control models and motor learning: clinical applications in neurorehabilitation. Neurologia. 2015;20(1):32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen NJ, Squire LR. Preserved learning and pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science. 1980;210:207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowan N, Chen Z, Rounder JN. Constant capacity in an immediate recall-task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956). Psychol Sci. 2004;15:634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards WH. Motor learning and control: from theory to practice. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitts P, Posner MI. Human performance. Belmont: Brooks/Cole Publishing; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kamm K, Thelen E, Jensen J. A dynamical systems approach to motor development. In: Rothstein JM, editor. Movement science. Suitable, Alexandria: American Physical Therapy Association; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. J Mot Behav. 1992;24:87–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Magill RA. The influence of augmented feedback on skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest. 1994;46(3):314–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Raab M. Implicit learning of movement skills for surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1062–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001;54(4):1049–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious Cogn. 2003;12(3):376–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maxwell JP, Caprio CM, Masters RSW. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: application of implicit and explicit approaches. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(4):4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullen R, Hardy L, Oldham A. Implicit and explicit control of motor actions: revisiting some early evidence. Br J Psychol. 2007;98(1):141–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neel A. Theories of psychology: a handbook (Revised and enlarged ed.). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newell KM, Constraints on the development of co-ordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dodrech: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newell KM. Motor skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;42:213–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Newell KM, Verhoeven FM. Movement rehabilitation: are the principles of re-learning in the recovery of function the same as those of original learning? Disabil Rehabil. 2017;32(2):121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Papagno C. Memory deficits. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:377–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Perry SB. Clinical implications of a dynamical systems theory. Neurol Rep. 1998;22:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothstein AL, Arnold RK. Bridging the gap: application of research on videotape feedback and bowling. In: Motor Skills: Theory and Practice. ISSN 0147–0302.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82:225–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt RA. Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt RA, Lang CA, Young DE. Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Hum Mov Sci. 1990;9:325–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma DA, Chevidikunnan MF, Khan FR, Gaowgzeh RA. Effectiveness of knowledge of result and knowledge of performance in the learning of a skilled motor activity by healthy young adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(5):1482–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Turvey MT, Fitch HL, Tuller B. The Bernstein perspective: 1. The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability. In: Kelso JAS, editor. Human motor behaviour: an introduction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1982. p. 239–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Utley A. Motor control, learning and development: instant notes. 2nd ed. Abingdon/New York: Routledge; 2018. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/detail.action?docID=5611556

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Vereijken B, Whiting HT, Beek WJ. A dynamical systems approach to skill acquisition. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992;45(2):323–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vidal A, Wu W, Nakajima M, Becker J. Investigating the constrained action hypothesis: a movement coordination and coordination variability approach. J Mot Behav. 2017;19:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6(1):77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wulf G, McNevin N. Simply distracting learners is not enough: more evidence for the learning benefits of external focus of attention. Eur J Sport Sci. 2003;3(5):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yusoff MSB, Hadie SNH, Rahim AFA. Adopting programmatic feedback to enhance the learning of complex skills: a cognitive load-based perspective. Med Educ. 2014;48:108. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felicity Blackstock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blackstock, F., Pritchard, S. (2020). Psychomotor Skill Development: Learning What and How To Do. In: Moy, M., Blackstock, F., Nici, L. (eds) Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44889-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics