Abstract
Effective self-management of a person’s health condition requires more than simply knowing about the health condition. A patient will learn about their condition, acquiring knowledge, but will also need specific skills that require motor control in combination with understanding. Examples of psychomotor skills a patient with a respiratory condition may be required to develop include the ability to take peak flow readings or learning to use a dry powder inhaler. ‘See one, do one’ is not appropriate for educating patients to perform these complex self-management procedures. The interaction between the patient, the task and goal of the movement, and the environment in which the movement is completed must inform the approach to teaching a person a new skill. Considerations for healthcare professionals includes the stage of learning, the memory and cognitive load, the context of learning, whether learning is explicit or implicit, whether the attention is external or internal, and how feedback is given. Subsequently, learning psychomotor skills requires more innovative teaching methods, as psychomotor skills require both a psychology/knowledge component, as well as a motor component, compared to knowledge learning alone. In this chapter, we will explore the theory relevant to the direct clinical context of supporting a patient to learn how to use a dry powder inhaler. The chapter provides the theoretical background for motor learning and underpins the scientific literature explored in Chap. 13, Teaching the practical skill of correct inhaler use: Knowing and being able to do. Understanding the processes involved in learning and subsequently performing psychomotor skills will enable healthcare professionals to better plan and deliver appropriate learning experiences for patients that positively impact on their abilities to self-manage their chronic respiratory condition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams JA. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav. 1971;3:111–49.
Anderson JR. Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychol Rev. 1987;94:192–210.
Berman MG. In search of decay in verbal short term memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009;35(2):317–33.
Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Molero-Sanchez A, Carratala-Tejadaa M, Alguacil-Diego IM, Molina-Reda F, Miangolarra-Pages JC, Torricellid D. Theories and control models and motor learning: clinical applications in neurorehabilitation. Neurologia. 2015;20(1):32–41.
Cohen NJ, Squire LR. Preserved learning and pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science. 1980;210:207–10.
Cowan N, Chen Z, Rounder JN. Constant capacity in an immediate recall-task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956). Psychol Sci. 2004;15:634–40.
Edwards WH. Motor learning and control: from theory to practice. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2011.
Fitts P, Posner MI. Human performance. Belmont: Brooks/Cole Publishing; 1967.
Kamm K, Thelen E, Jensen J. A dynamical systems approach to motor development. In: Rothstein JM, editor. Movement science. Suitable, Alexandria: American Physical Therapy Association; 1991.
Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. J Mot Behav. 1992;24:87–196.
Magill RA. The influence of augmented feedback on skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest. 1994;46(3):314–27.
Masters RSW, Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Raab M. Implicit learning of movement skills for surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1062–4.
Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kerr E, Weedon E. The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001;54(4):1049–68.
Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Eves FF. The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious Cogn. 2003;12(3):376–402.
Maxwell JP, Caprio CM, Masters RSW. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: application of implicit and explicit approaches. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(4):4.
Mullen R, Hardy L, Oldham A. Implicit and explicit control of motor actions: revisiting some early evidence. Br J Psychol. 2007;98(1):141–56.
Neel A. Theories of psychology: a handbook (Revised and enlarged ed.). Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company; 1977.
Newell KM, Constraints on the development of co-ordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dodrech: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986.
Newell KM. Motor skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;42:213–37.
Newell KM, Verhoeven FM. Movement rehabilitation: are the principles of re-learning in the recovery of function the same as those of original learning? Disabil Rehabil. 2017;32(2):121–6.
Papagno C. Memory deficits. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:377–93.
Perry SB. Clinical implications of a dynamical systems theory. Neurol Rep. 1998;22:4–10.
Rothstein AL, Arnold RK. Bridging the gap: application of research on videotape feedback and bowling. In: Motor Skills: Theory and Practice. ISSN 0147–0302.
Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82:225–60.
Schmidt RA. Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1991.
Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2011.
Schmidt RA, Lang CA, Young DE. Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Hum Mov Sci. 1990;9:325–48.
Sharma DA, Chevidikunnan MF, Khan FR, Gaowgzeh RA. Effectiveness of knowledge of result and knowledge of performance in the learning of a skilled motor activity by healthy young adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(5):1482–6.
Turvey MT, Fitch HL, Tuller B. The Bernstein perspective: 1. The problems of degrees of freedom and context-conditioned variability. In: Kelso JAS, editor. Human motor behaviour: an introduction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1982. p. 239–52.
Utley A. Motor control, learning and development: instant notes. 2nd ed. Abingdon/New York: Routledge; 2018. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/detail.action?docID=5611556
Vereijken B, Whiting HT, Beek WJ. A dynamical systems approach to skill acquisition. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992;45(2):323–44.
Vidal A, Wu W, Nakajima M, Becker J. Investigating the constrained action hypothesis: a movement coordination and coordination variability approach. J Mot Behav. 2017;19:1–10.
Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6(1):77–104.
Wulf G, McNevin N. Simply distracting learners is not enough: more evidence for the learning benefits of external focus of attention. Eur J Sport Sci. 2003;3(5):1–13.
Yusoff MSB, Hadie SNH, Rahim AFA. Adopting programmatic feedback to enhance the learning of complex skills: a cognitive load-based perspective. Med Educ. 2014;48:108. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blackstock, F., Pritchard, S. (2020). Psychomotor Skill Development: Learning What and How To Do. In: Moy, M., Blackstock, F., Nici, L. (eds) Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44888-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44889-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)