Skip to main content

William James Revisted: “Pragmatic” Approaches to Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of the Philosophy of Religion

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life ((BSPR,volume 8))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

This essay examines how William James conceptualized the philosophy of religion, including his view about the future of religion, for the purpose of aiding our own view on the future of this field in the present age. It focuses on three different aspects of his thought about religion against a backdrop of the centrality of our evolutionary, creaturely frame. First, I talk about selected pre-Varieties essays, in which James focuses on the relations of thought and action. In so doing, I will note where theism fits in for James then, and attend to his very straightforward conceptual generalizations about what religion implies. Second, I talk about James’s psychological findings about religion, glossing some of the details of Varieties with regard to the individual and social aspects of religion. And third, I turn briefly to the developed “pragmatic” and “radical-empiricist” period of James’s thought, where he delineates religion’s connection to his pluralistic meliorism. This culminates in a clear suggestion that the twenty-first century is not likely to see humankind evolving “beyond” religion, in any meaningful sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Dinitia Smith, “Another Top 100 List: Now It’s Nonfiction,” The New York Times, April 30, 1999. First place went to Henry Adams, third to Booker T. Washington, and fourth to Virginia Woolf, so James was in fine company, despite the problems with such lists.

  2. 2.

    The posthumously published collection of essays Essays in Radical Empiricism (1912) has little to do with religion, while Some Problems in Philosophy (also posthumous, 1910b/1911) treats religion in a number of places.

  3. 3.

    Wyman was more of an influence on James than Aggasiz, according to Perry, and certainly, James’s ideas resonate more with Wyman than with Aggasiz’s denial of Darwinian evolution. See Perry 1935, 1:208–9. Please note that in the interest of promoting open access, I make all references to public domain editions when possible. For writers who publish in English, normally I refer to the original copyrighted edition, which is most likely to be out of copyright and available in public resources such as Google Books and the Open Library, among others.

  4. 4.

    James’s similarities to Kant should be evident. Kant argues on both theoretical and practical grounds that our move to theism is driven by certain needs of reason, and he plays this out differently in terms of intellectual coherence of the natural and intelligible, as well as in terms of a guarantor of justice. James takes God in similar ways, but doesn’t give any basis for understanding why God shares our interests, a point that Kant situates in the formal structure of reason. Rather, for James, it seems more that we can only recognize a God who shares our better interests, but that we do recognize this God (or power). And, moreover, this is for James motivational, a point which Kant fully resists.

  5. 5.

    This is a belief that James will, eventually, seek to justify with his defense of the right to believe.

  6. 6.

    “Religion, therefore, as I now ask you arbitrarily to take it, shall mean for us the feelings, acts and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to the divine.” James 1902, 34.

  7. 7.

    Proudfoot (1987) Religious Experience.

  8. 8.

    “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds,” 1841, 47. C.f.:, James’scomments about the plural and competing forms of rationality in A Pluralistic Universe (1909b).

References

  • Emerson RW (1841) Essays. Freeman and Bolles, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach L ([1843] 1881) The essence of Christianity (trans: Marian Evans), 2nd edn. Trübner and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1880] 1882) Rationality, activity and faith. Princeton Rev, New York 58:58–86

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1884) Introduction. In: James H (ed) The Literary Remains of the Late. James R. Osgood and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890a) Principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1890b] 1897) Moral philosopher and the moral life. In: The will to believe and other essays in philosophy. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1896] 1897) The will to believe. In: The will to believe and other essays in philosophy. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1881] 1897) Reflex action and theism. In: The will to believe and other essays in philosophy. Longmans Green and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1902) Varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1907) Pragmatism. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1909a) The meaning of truth. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1909b) A pluralistic universe. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1910a) A suggestion about mysticism. J Philos Psychol Sci Methods 7:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • James W ([1910b] 1911) Some problems in philosophy. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1912) Essays in radical empiricism. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • James HIII (1920) The letters of William James, vol 2. The Atlantic Monthly Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (2000) Correspondence of William James. In: Skrupskelis IK, Berkeley EM (eds) 12 volumes. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry RB (1935) The thought and character of William James, as revealed in unpublished correspondence and notes, together with his published writings, vol 2. Little Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot W (1987) Religious Experience. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RD, et al (2014) The class of 2014 by the numbers. The Harvard Crimson Commencement edition (May 29)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Lamberth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lamberth, D.C. (2021). William James Revisted: “Pragmatic” Approaches to Religion. In: Eckel, M.D., Speight, C.A., DuJardin, T. (eds) The Future of the Philosophy of Religion. Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44606-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics