Skip to main content

Obligatory Admission in the Light of Post-Colonialism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens

Part of the book series: Münster Lectures in Philosophy ((MUELP,volume 6))

Abstract

According to what Joseph Carens calls the conventional view, states have a right to exercise discretionary control over immigration. However, this right is not without limits. Extending Carens’s own suggestions, we claim that people who are harmed by historical injustices have a strong moral right to immigrate. We draw on the discussion about historical injustices to clarify that there are obligations towards those who suffered historical injustice – our central example is the genocide of the Herero people. One way of responding to these obligations is to admit immigration. Finally, we argue that it should be up to the victims to decide in which way reparation should be paid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The enumeration of both mental and physical shape is not intended to suggest any metaphysical distinction.

  2. 2.

    We will concentrate on the assessment of the German genocide. It would also be possible to look at the broader picture (colonialism as such), but this would lead us too far from our focus. Kant, Maine, and Diderot on the one side and Mill and Tocqueville on the other side would be worth reading in this regard.

  3. 3.

    Historically one could also mention ‘The Report On The Natives Of South West Africa And Their Treatment By Germany’, the so called Blue Book, which was commissioned by the English Empire. But since it was also used as propaganda in the First World War we will not take it into consideration, only mention its existence.

  4. 4.

    The qualifier ‘still’ has therefore two dimensions. Firstly, it expresses the causal connection and secondly, it emphasizes the continuity of the experienced harm.

  5. 5.

    It might be added: if they do fulfil any criteria of exclusion.

  6. 6.

    We owe this argument by and large to Matthias Hoesch.

  7. 7.

    The question of how the plausibility of accusations can be validated is more of an empirical question and not our concern for the time being.

References

  • Barkan, Elazar. 2001. The Guilt of Nations. Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, Daniel. 2009. Rectifying International Injustice. Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Historical Justice in Postcolonial Contexts. Repairing Historical Wrongs and the End of Empire. In Historical Justice and Memory, ed. Klaus Neumann/Janna Thompson, 166–184. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, Joseph H. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of justice as Evenhandedness. (= CCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (= EoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. On the Relationship Between Normative Claims and empirical Realities in Immigration. In Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop. Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis, ed. Matthias Hoesch und Lena Laube, 13–29. Münster: ULB Münster (miami.uni-muenster.de). https://doi.org/10.17879/15199614880. (= RNCER).

  • Dassah, Emmanuel Zumabakuro. 2018. The Church, Transnational Land Deals and Empowering Local Communities in Northern Ghana. A Christian Socio-ethical Perspective. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1987. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewald, Jan-Bart. 1994. The Great General of the Kaiser. Botswana Notes and Records 26: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Herero Heroes. A Socio-Political History of the Herero of Namibia, 1890–1923. Oxford: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackmann, Christina. 2012. Poverty Reduction and Pro-Poor Growth. The Role of Empowerment. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Adam. 2004. Genocide, War Crimes and the West. History and Complicity. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klose, Fabian. 2009. Menschenrechte im Schatten kolonialer Gewalt. Die Dekolonisierungskriege in Kenia und Algerien 1945–1962. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, Gesine. 2016. Bestien und Opfer: Frauen im Kolonialkrieg. In Völkermord in Deutsch-Südwestafrika. Der Kolonialkrieg (1904–1908) in Namibia und seine Folgen, ed. Jürgen Zimmerer/Joachim Zeller, 142–159. Berlin: Ch. Links Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Lukas. 2016. Intergenerational Justice. SEP https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/justice-intergenerational/. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  • Sarkin-Hughes, Jeremy. 2009. Colonial Genocide and Reparations Claims in the 21st Century. The Socio-Legal Context of Claims Under International Law by the HERERO Against Germany for Genocide in Namibia, 1904–1908. Westport: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schefczyk, Michael. 2009. Untangling Historical Injustice and Historical Ill. Intergenerational Justice Review 9: 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Verantwortung für historisches Unrecht. Eine philosophische Untersuchung. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1993. Capability and Well-Being. In The Quality of Life, ed. Martha Nussbaum, 30–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Souter, James. 2014. Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice. Political Studies 62: 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetzlaff, Rainer. 2018. Afrika. In Eine Einführung in Geschichte, Politik und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, Heinrich August. 2013. Geschichte des Westens. Von den Anfängen in der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ypi, Lea. 2013. What’s Wrong with Colonialism. Philosophy & Public Affairs 41: 158–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette Schwabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schwabe, B., Urselmann, J. (2020). Obligatory Admission in the Light of Post-Colonialism. In: Hoesch, M., Mooren, N. (eds) Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens. Münster Lectures in Philosophy, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44476-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics