Skip to main content

Voting Rights for Residents? Revisiting Carens’s Citizenship Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens

Part of the book series: Münster Lectures in Philosophy ((MUELP,volume 6))

  • 999 Accesses

Abstract

The fact that voting rights are often withheld from non-citizen residents leads the authors to revisit Joseph Carens’s stance on who has a legitimate claim to the rights that are usually associated with citizenship. It is argued that although Carens generally side-lines the idea of detaching the franchise from the bundle of citizen-exclusive rights, two of his main principles (namely the principle of democratic legitimacy and the social membership principle) in fact prompt such a detachment. This is because a coherent interpretation of both principles reveals them to stand in conflict with current naturalisation practices: a conflict which – as the authors demonstrate – is best resolved by severing the link between voting rights and citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are a few exceptions: The UK and Ireland grant the right to vote in national elections to each other’s citizens, while only Barbados, Urugay and New Zealand allow the same thing for non-citizens which meet certain requirements (see Shaw 2017, 303).

  2. 2.

    Le Portail des Statistiques. 2018. Population by Sex and Nationality on 1st January (x1000) 1981, 1991, 2001–2018. https://statistiques.public.lu/stat/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=12853&IF_Language=eng. Accessed November 25th, 2018.

  3. 3.

    Federal Statistical Office. 2018. Ständige Wohnbevölkerung nach Staatsangehörigkeitskategorie, Alter und Kanton, 3. Quartal 2018. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/population/effectif-change.assetdetail.6866254.html. Accessed January 20th, 2019.

  4. 4.

    This is not always readily apparent in Carens’s discussion. However, it becomes clear in a passage from The Ethics of Immigration where he shows how an individual right, such as the right to protection from deportation, follows from social membership. He only felt the need to demonstrate this link between membership and single rights, Carens says, because some people may not have been convinced by his earlier contention that social membership grounds a claim to the whole citizenship bundle (see EoI, 104).

  5. 5.

    For further discussion of the possibilities for allowing non-residents to influence the decisions of a state see López-Guerra 2014, 95f.

  6. 6.

    Balázs Majtényi, Alíz Nagy and Péter Kállai. 2018. “Only Fidesz” – Minority Electoral Law in Hungary. Verfassungsblog.de. https://verfassungsblog.de/only-fidesz-electoral-law-in-hungary/. Accessed January 20th, 2019.

  7. 7.

    An example of this would be the concerns over the rule of law in Hungary that were voiced by the European Parliament in 2018, with the latter specifically directing attention to the issues of “[j]udicial independence, freedom of expression, corruption, rights of minorities, and the situation of migrants and refugees” (European parliament. 2018. Rule of law in Hungary: Parliament calls on the EU to act. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180906IPR12104/rule-of-law-in-hungary-parliament-calls-on-the-eu-to-act. Accessed January 28th, 2019).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Bonberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonberg, F., Rensing, L. (2020). Voting Rights for Residents? Revisiting Carens’s Citizenship Rights. In: Hoesch, M., Mooren, N. (eds) Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens. Münster Lectures in Philosophy, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44476-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics