Skip to main content

Between Aliens and Citizens. An Outline of Joseph Carens’s Political Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens

Part of the book series: Münster Lectures in Philosophy ((MUELP,volume 6))

  • 362 Accesses

Abstract

The text outlines Joseph Carens’s Political Philosophy and is the introduction to the volume Joseph Carens. Between Aliens and Citizens which comprises a critical discussion of Carens’s work as well as his detailed replies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This subject is addressed in this volume by Elger/Zurwehme (Chap. 7) and Pöld/Ünlü/Zemke (Chap. 8). Carens explains his contextual approach as well as his broader methodological aspirations in greater detail in his replies that make up the final part of this volume.

  2. 2.

    Carens’s claims about the fair treatment of Muslims are challenged in this volume by Güttner/Heying/Luangyosluachakul (Chap. 4).

  3. 3.

    The arguments used to justify these policies are critically discussed in this volume by Jeggle/Vogt-Reimuth (Chap. 3).

  4. 4.

    For a condensed summary of Carens’s claims about immigration, see also Chap. 2 of this volume.

  5. 5.

    The temporal element of Carens’s view is discussed in this volume by Müller-Salo (Chap. 6), while Bonberg/Rensing (Chap. 5) argue that Carens should treat voting rights differently from other rights linked to citizenship.

  6. 6.

    See EoI, Chap. 2. Carens already points out at length in CCC (Chaps. 7 and 8) that citizenship should be understood in ways that are compatible with multiple memberships and overlapping identities.

  7. 7.

    That Carens should add victims of historical injustice to the list of exceptions is the argument made in this volume by Urselmann/Schwabe (Chap. 9).

  8. 8.

    Rawls himself would later reject the attempt to use the veil of ignorance at an international level; see Rawls 1999.

  9. 9.

    The structure and implications of the cantilever argument are scrutinized in this volume by Düring/Luft (Chap. 10).

  10. 10.

    Whether the Open Border Claim can justify claims in nonideal worlds is discussed in this volume by Hoesch/Kleinschmidt (Chap. 11).

  11. 11.

    The question of how both utopias might be combined is treated in this volume by Förster/Gotzes/Hennemann/Kahmen/Westerhorstmann (Chap. 12).

References

  • Carens, Joseph H. 1981. Equality, Moral Incentives, and the Market. An Essay in Utopian Politico-Economic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (= EMIM).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics 49 (2): 251–273. (= AC).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1995. Is Quebec Nationalism Just? Perspectives from Anglophone Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. (= QN).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (= CCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. An Interpretation and Defense of the Socialist Principle of Distribution. Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (1): 145–177. (= SPD).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Integration of Immigrants. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (1): 29–46. (= IoI).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Immigrants and the Right to Stay. Cambridge: MIT Press. (= IRS).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (= EoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. The Egalitarian Ethos As a Social Mechanism. In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage. G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, ed. Alexander H. Kaufman, 50–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (= EESM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 2013. Is There a Human Right to Immigrate? In Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, ed. Sarah Fine and Lea Ypi, 11–31. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1995. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Mooren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoesch, M., Mooren, N. (2020). Between Aliens and Citizens. An Outline of Joseph Carens’s Political Philosophy. In: Hoesch, M., Mooren, N. (eds) Joseph Carens: Between Aliens and Citizens. Münster Lectures in Philosophy, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44476-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics