Skip to main content

Integrating Impairment-Driven Cancer Rehabilitation into the Care Continuum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cancer Rehabilitation

Abstract

Cancer is one of the most common, disabling, and costly diagnoses that affects people living in the USA and worldwide. However, even though there is an increase in the overall 5-year survival rate, survival is not necessarily disease free, and often people live with cancer as a chronic condition. Historically, cancer rehabilitation was not well integrated into oncology care. More recently, research has demonstrated that cancer survivors may have multiple impairments that are not treated. Indeed, while the field of cancer rehabilitation has been present for decades, it has grown a lot recently, and there is an urgent need to diagnose and treat the many impairments that cancer or its treatments may cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results [SEER] Program cancer stat facts: cancer of any site. National Cancer Institute. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html. Accessed 23 July 2017.

  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2017. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Expected new cancer cases and deaths in 2020. US Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/research/articles/cancer_2020.htm. Published 2016. Accessed 23 July 2017.

  4. Dietz JH Jr. Rehabilitation of the cancer patient. Med Clin North Am. 1969;53(3):607–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann JF, DeLisa JA, Warren CG, de Lateur BJ, Bryant PL, Nicholson CG. Cancer rehabilitation: assessment of need, development, and evaluation of a model of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978;59(9):410–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheville AL, Troxel AB, Basford JR, Kornblith AB. Prevalence and treatment patterns of physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(16):2621–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheville AL, Beck LA, Petersen TL, Marks RS, Gamble GL. The detection and treatment of cancer-related functional problems in an outpatient setting. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(1):61–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pergolotti M, Deal AM, Lavery J, Reeve BB, Muss HB. The prevalence of potentially modifiable functional deficits and the subsequent use of occupational and physical therapy by older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6(3):194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bevans MF, Mitchell SA, Barrett JA, et al. Symptom distress predicts long-term health and well-being in allogeneic stem cell transplantation survivors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(3):387–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Penttinen HM, Saarto T, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, et al. Quality of life and physical performance and activity of breast cancer patients after adjuvant treatments. Psychooncology. 2011;20(11):1211–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Banks E, Byles JE, Gibson RE, et al. Is psychological distress in people living with cancer related to the fact of diagnosis, current treatment or level of disability? Findings from a large Australian study. Med J Aust. 2010;193(5 Suppl):S62–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, et al. Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21(11):2108–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silver JK, Baima J, Mayer RS. Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(5):295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McEwen S, Rodriguez AM, Martino R, Poon I, Dunphy C, Rios JN, Ringash J. “I didn’t actually know there was such a thing as rehab”: survivor, family, and clinician perceptions of rehabilitation following treatment for head and neck cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(4):1449–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silver JK, Raj VS, Fu JB, et al. Most National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center websites do not provide survivors with information about cancer rehabilitation services. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(5):947–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silver JK, Raj VS, Fu JB, Wisotzky EM, Smith SR, Kirch RA. Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology care services. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:3633–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stout NL, Silver JK, Alfano CM, Ness KK, Gilchrist LS. Long-term survivorship care after cancer treatment: a new emphasis on the role of rehabilitation services. Phys Ther. 2019;99(1):10–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Institute of Medicine. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Institute of Medicine. Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher A, et al. A systematic review of exercise systematic reviews in the cancer literature (2005-2017). PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S347–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stout NL, Silver JK, Raj VS, et al. Toward a national initiative in cancer rehabilitation: recommendations from a subject matter expert group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):2006–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith SR, Reish AG, Andrews C. Cancer survivorship: a growing role for physiatric care. PM R. 2015;7(5):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cristian A, Tran A, Patel K. Patient safety in cancer rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2012;23(2):441–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2012.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maltser S, Cristian A, Silver JK, et al. A focused review of safety considerations in cancer rehabilitation. PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S415–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Silver JK, Baima J, Newman R, Galantino ML, Shockney LD. Cancer rehabilitation may improve function in survivors and decrease the economic burden of cancer to society. Work. 2013;46:455–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alfano CM, Kent EE, Padgett LS, et al. Making cancer rehabilitation services work for cancer patients: recommendations for research and practice to improve employment outcomes. PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Silver JK, Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(8):715–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carli F, Silver JK, Feldman LS, et al. Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(1):49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith SR, Khanna A, Wisotzky EM. An evolving role for cancer rehabilitation in the era of low dose lung CT screening. PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Santa Mina D, Brahmbhatt P, Lopez C, et al. The case for prehabilitation prior to breast cancer treatment. PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S305–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith SR, Khanna A, Wisotzky EM. An evolving role for cancer rehabilitation in the era of low-dose lung computed tomography screening. PM R. 2017;9(9S2):S407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Center to Advance Palliative Care (2011) Public opinion research on palliative care. https://media.capc.org/filer_public/18/ab/18ab708c-f835-4380-921d-fbf729702e36/2011-public-opinion-research-on-palliative-care.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2019

  34. Lyons KD, Padgett LS, Marshall TF, et al. Follow the trail: using insight from the growth of palliative care to propose a roadmap for cancer rehabilitation. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21549. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure of Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie K. Silver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Silver, J.K. (2020). Integrating Impairment-Driven Cancer Rehabilitation into the Care Continuum. In: Baima, J., Khanna, A. (eds) Cancer Rehabilitation . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44462-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44462-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44461-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44462-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics