Skip to main content

Human Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Real, Mechanical, Experimental

Abstract

Hooke’s ideas on the nature and origin of human knowledge are mainly to be found in the text of a lecture delivered at the Royal Society on June 14, 1682 and in a short manuscript kept in the library of Trinity College, Cambridge. In Hooke’s later writings there is no place for innate Cartesian ideas, as all human knowledge originates from the senses. The human mind is described as a “piece of soft wax,” both impressions and ideas as corporeal alterations of the brain. “These ideas,” Hooke writes, “I will suppose to be material and bulky, that is to be certain bodies of determinate bigness, and impregnated with distinctive motions, and to be in themselves distinct.” Like Kenelm Digby, Hooke thinks of ideas as the stamps left on the brain by material impressions. These stamps take the shape of “little images.” Although every sense conveys to the brain different kinds of impressions, Hooke does not distinguish them because all “are generally comprised under one name.” The only difference among ideas is due to their different degrees of complexity and composition. Some of them are “more immediate,” others “more mediate and complex.” Immediate ideas “are the more first and more simple, such as are the results of the impressions of the senses.” Complex ideas have different degrees of composition, being the result of the comparison of a variable number of simple ideas. Therefore, “the ideas that are made from fewer and more simple ideas, are less compounded ideas”; on the contrary “those which are made from a greater number, and those more compounded ideas, are yet more and more compounded, and more and more accomplish’d and perfect.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Birch (1756–57), vol. IV, 153; cf. Sutton (2013), 299.

  2. 2.

    Oldroyd (1980), 19; cf. Clarke (1989), 43–4, 48–9, 50, 71, 100.

  3. 3.

    Oldroyd (1980), 17.

  4. 4.

    Hooke (1705), 142.

  5. 5.

    Ibid, 144; Oldroyd (1980), 17; cf. Digby (1644), 282–4; see also Henry (1982), 223–4.

  6. 6.

    Oldroyd (1980), 17–8.

  7. 7.

    Hooke (1705), 146.

  8. 8.

    Wear (1983), 223, 231–2; Schmitt (1983), 7, 10, 32; Id. (1985), 16–7, 75, 93; Kessler (2001), 83; Bianchi (2003), 136–45; Sgarbi (2012), 103–9.

  9. 9.

    Harvey (1651), B3v; Id. (1847), 157.

  10. 10.

    Bacon (1857–74), vol. III, 600–1; Farrington (1964), 82.

  11. 11.

    Harvey (1651), B4v; Id. (1847), 171.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Sgarbi (2013), 156, 166.

  13. 13.

    Hooke (1705), 4.

  14. 14.

    Gassendi (1658), vol. I, 92–3.

  15. 15.

    Oldroyd (1980), 17, 19.

  16. 16.

    Ibid, 19–20.

  17. 17.

    Cf. Draaisma (2000), 64; Id. (2006), 111, Singer (1976), 119.

  18. 18.

    Hooke (1705), 141.

  19. 19.

    Draaisma (2000), 41, 58–59; cf. Id. (2006), 116.

  20. 20.

    Hooke (1705), 140–1.

  21. 21.

    Ibid, 145.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, 141.

  23. 23.

    Ibid, 147.

  24. 24.

    Glanvill (1665), 16.

  25. 25.

    For a different opinion see Oldroyd (1980), 21; MacIntosh (1983), 349–50.

  26. 26.

    Michael (2000), 168; Osler (1994), 200.

  27. 27.

    Gassendi (1658), vol. II, 255.

  28. 28.

    Ibid, vol. I, 92.

  29. 29.

    Ibid, vol. II, 250.

  30. 30.

    Ibid, 411.

  31. 31.

    Willis (1680), vol. II, 2–10, 51–4, 62.

  32. 32.

    Chapman (2005), 9, 20; Wright (1991), 245.

  33. 33.

    Cf. Lewis (2009), 157–8.

  34. 34.

    Meschini (1998), 122, 125; Adelman (1966), vol. I, 300–2.

  35. 35.

    Willis (1680), vol. I, 48–9.

  36. 36.

    Ibid, vol. II, 48.

  37. 37.

    Hooke (1705), 147.

  38. 38.

    Ibid, 144–6.

  39. 39.

    Birch (1756–57), vol. IV, 154.

  40. 40.

    Cf. Kassler (1995), 135.

  41. 41.

    Hooke (1705), 146.

  42. 42.

    Respectively Guildhall Library, London MS 1757.12 and Royal Society Classified Papers, vol. XX, ff. 65–66.

  43. 43.

    Guildhall Library, London MS 1757.12, f. 113r-v; Royal Society Classified Papers, vol. XX, f. 65r-v.

  44. 44.

    Hooke (1705), 12.

  45. 45.

    Ibid, 53; cf. Lovejoy (1936) 186–9.

  46. 46.

    Hooke (1665), 154.

  47. 47.

    Ibid, 127.

  48. 48.

    Hooke (1705), 52.

  49. 49.

    Id. (1665), 127.

  50. 50.

    Id. (1705), 53.

  51. 51.

    Ibid, 341.

  52. 52.

    Hooke (1665), 327.

  53. 53.

    Id. (1705), 56.

  54. 54.

    Ibid, 23.

  55. 55.

    Ibid, 47.

  56. 56.

    Hooke (1665), 90.

  57. 57.

    Ibid, 134.

  58. 58.

    Ibid, 123, 134; cf. Gunther (1968), vol. VII, 592–3.

  59. 59.

    Hooke (1665), 130.

  60. 60.

    Ibid, 124.

  61. 61.

    Ibid, 151.

  62. 62.

    Cf. Hunter (1990), 444, 448; Id. (1995), 178–9, 229–30, 241.

  63. 63.

    Cf. Petty (2012), 96, 103, 122–4.

  64. 64.

    Hooke (1665), 124.

  65. 65.

    Ibid, 177.

  66. 66.

    Ibid, 171–2.

  67. 67.

    Hooke (1705), 120.

  68. 68.

    Harvey (1651), B2v; Id. (1847), 157.

  69. 69.

    Descartes 1964–74, vol. VII, 332; Id. (1984–91), vol. II, 230.

  70. 70.

    Gassendi (1658), vol. I, 100, 103.

  71. 71.

    Hooke (1705), 330–1.

  72. 72.

    Id. (1726), 172.

  73. 73.

    Id. (1705), 330–1.

  74. 74.

    Id. (1677), 32.

  75. 75.

    Descartes (1964–74), vol. VII, 63–4; Id. (1984–91), vol. I, 143–4.

  76. 76.

    Hooke (1677), 33.

  77. 77.

    Glanvill (1665), 89; cf. Id. (1675), 23.

  78. 78.

    Hooke (1705), 8–9; cf. Bacon (1857–74), vol. VIII, 76–7.

  79. 79.

    Hooke (1705), 9; cf. Bacon (1857–74), vol. IX, 369–370.

  80. 80.

    Hooke (1665), sig. a1v.

  81. 81.

    Cf. Bacon (1857–74), vol. VIII, 78.

  82. 82.

    Hooke (1705), 10–1.

  83. 83.

    Ibid, 9.

References

  • Adelman, Howard. 1966. Marcello Malpighi and the evolution of embryology, 5 vols. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1857–74. Works, 7 vols. ed. Robert L. Ellis, James Spedding, Douglas D. Heath. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Luca. 2003. Studi sull’aristotelismo del Cinquecento. Padua: Il Poligrafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, Thomas. 1756–57. The history of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Alan. 2005. England’s Leonardo: Robert Hooke and the seventeenth-century scientific revolution. Bristol/Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Desmond. 1989. Occult powers and hypotheses: Cartesian natural philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1964–74. Oeuvres, 12 vols., ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984–91. The philosophical writings, 3 vols., Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Douglas Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, Kenelm. 1644. Two treatises. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draaisma, Douwe. 2000. Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Hooke on memory and the memory of Hooke. In Robert Hooke: Tercentennial studies, ed. Michael Cooper and Michael Hunter, 111–121. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, Benjamin. 1964. The philosophy of Francis Bacon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre. 1658. Opera omnia, 6 vols. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanvill, Joseph.1665. Scepsis scientifica. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1675. Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, Robert T. 1968. Early science in Oxford, 15 vols. London: Dowsons of Pall Mall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, William. 1651. Exercitationes de generatione animalium. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1847. The works of William Harvey. Trans. Robert Willis. London: Sydenham Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, John. 1982. Atomism and eschatology: Catholicism and natural philosophy in the interregnum. British Journal for the History of Science 15: 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia. London: J. Martyn and J. Allestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1677. Lampas. London: J. Martyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1705. Posthumous works, ed. Richard Waller. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1726. Philosophical experiments and observations, ed. William Derham. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Michael. 1990. First steps in institutionalization: The role of the Royal Society of London. In Solomon’s house revisited: The organization and institutionalization of science, ed. Tore Frängsmyr, 13–29. Canton: Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Science and the shape of orthodoxy: Intellectual change in late seventeenth-century Britain. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassler, Jamie. 1995. Inner music: Hobbes, Hooke and North on internal character. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Eckhard. 2001. Metaphysics or empirical science? The two faces of Aristotelian natural philosophy in the sixteenth century. In Renaissance readings of the corpus aristotelicum, ed. Marianne Pade, 79–101. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Rhodri. 2009. A kind of sagacity: Francis Bacon, the ars memoriae and the pursuit of natural knowledge. Intellectual History Review 19: 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur. 1936. The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh, Jack. 1983. Perception and imagination in Descartes, Boyle and Hooke. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschini, Franco. 1998. Neurofisiologia cartesiana. Firenze: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Emily. 2000. Renaissance theories of body, soul, mind. In Psyche and soma: Physicians and metaphysicians on the mind-body problem from antiquity to enlightenment, ed. John P. Wright and Paul Potter, 147–172. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd, David. 1980. Some ‘Philosophical Scribbles’ attributed to Robert Hooke. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 35: 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler, Margaret. 1994. Divine will and the mechanical philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on contingency and necessity in the created world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, William. 2012. Of the scales of creatures. In William Petty on the order of nature: An unpublished manuscript treatise, ed. Rhodri Lewis, 93–199. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Charles. 1983. Aristotle and the renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sgarbi, Marco. 2012. Towards a reassessment of British Aristotelianism. Vivarium 50: 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B.R. 1976. Robert Hooke on memory, association and time perception. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 31: 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, John. 2013. Body and soul. In The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. Peter Anstey, 285–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear, Andrew. 1983. William Harvey and the ‘way of anatomists’. History of Science 21: 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Thomas. 1680. Opera omnia, 2 vols. Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John. 1991. Locke, Willis and the seventeenth-century Epicurean soul. In Atoms, pneuma and tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European thought, ed. Margaret Osler, 239–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sacco, F.G. (2020). Human Understanding. In: Real, Mechanical, Experimental. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44450-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44451-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics