Abstract
Hooke’s ideas on the nature and origin of human knowledge are mainly to be found in the text of a lecture delivered at the Royal Society on June 14, 1682 and in a short manuscript kept in the library of Trinity College, Cambridge. In Hooke’s later writings there is no place for innate Cartesian ideas, as all human knowledge originates from the senses. The human mind is described as a “piece of soft wax,” both impressions and ideas as corporeal alterations of the brain. “These ideas,” Hooke writes, “I will suppose to be material and bulky, that is to be certain bodies of determinate bigness, and impregnated with distinctive motions, and to be in themselves distinct.” Like Kenelm Digby, Hooke thinks of ideas as the stamps left on the brain by material impressions. These stamps take the shape of “little images.” Although every sense conveys to the brain different kinds of impressions, Hooke does not distinguish them because all “are generally comprised under one name.” The only difference among ideas is due to their different degrees of complexity and composition. Some of them are “more immediate,” others “more mediate and complex.” Immediate ideas “are the more first and more simple, such as are the results of the impressions of the senses.” Complex ideas have different degrees of composition, being the result of the comparison of a variable number of simple ideas. Therefore, “the ideas that are made from fewer and more simple ideas, are less compounded ideas”; on the contrary “those which are made from a greater number, and those more compounded ideas, are yet more and more compounded, and more and more accomplish’d and perfect.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Oldroyd (1980), 17.
- 4.
Hooke (1705), 142.
- 5.
- 6.
Oldroyd (1980), 17–8.
- 7.
Hooke (1705), 146.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Cf. Sgarbi (2013), 156, 166.
- 13.
Hooke (1705), 4.
- 14.
Gassendi (1658), vol. I, 92–3.
- 15.
Oldroyd (1980), 17, 19.
- 16.
Ibid, 19–20.
- 17.
- 18.
Hooke (1705), 141.
- 19.
- 20.
Hooke (1705), 140–1.
- 21.
Ibid, 145.
- 22.
Ibid, 141.
- 23.
Ibid, 147.
- 24.
Glanvill (1665), 16.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
Gassendi (1658), vol. II, 255.
- 28.
Ibid, vol. I, 92.
- 29.
Ibid, vol. II, 250.
- 30.
Ibid, 411.
- 31.
Willis (1680), vol. II, 2–10, 51–4, 62.
- 32.
- 33.
Cf. Lewis (2009), 157–8.
- 34.
- 35.
Willis (1680), vol. I, 48–9.
- 36.
Ibid, vol. II, 48.
- 37.
Hooke (1705), 147.
- 38.
Ibid, 144–6.
- 39.
Birch (1756–57), vol. IV, 154.
- 40.
Cf. Kassler (1995), 135.
- 41.
Hooke (1705), 146.
- 42.
Respectively Guildhall Library, London MS 1757.12 and Royal Society Classified Papers, vol. XX, ff. 65–66.
- 43.
Guildhall Library, London MS 1757.12, f. 113r-v; Royal Society Classified Papers, vol. XX, f. 65r-v.
- 44.
Hooke (1705), 12.
- 45.
Ibid, 53; cf. Lovejoy (1936) 186–9.
- 46.
Hooke (1665), 154.
- 47.
Ibid, 127.
- 48.
Hooke (1705), 52.
- 49.
Id. (1665), 127.
- 50.
Id. (1705), 53.
- 51.
Ibid, 341.
- 52.
Hooke (1665), 327.
- 53.
Id. (1705), 56.
- 54.
Ibid, 23.
- 55.
Ibid, 47.
- 56.
Hooke (1665), 90.
- 57.
Ibid, 134.
- 58.
Ibid, 123, 134; cf. Gunther (1968), vol. VII, 592–3.
- 59.
Hooke (1665), 130.
- 60.
Ibid, 124.
- 61.
Ibid, 151.
- 62.
- 63.
Cf. Petty (2012), 96, 103, 122–4.
- 64.
Hooke (1665), 124.
- 65.
Ibid, 177.
- 66.
Ibid, 171–2.
- 67.
Hooke (1705), 120.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
Gassendi (1658), vol. I, 100, 103.
- 71.
Hooke (1705), 330–1.
- 72.
Id. (1726), 172.
- 73.
Id. (1705), 330–1.
- 74.
Id. (1677), 32.
- 75.
- 76.
Hooke (1677), 33.
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
Hooke (1665), sig. a1v.
- 81.
Cf. Bacon (1857–74), vol. VIII, 78.
- 82.
Hooke (1705), 10–1.
- 83.
Ibid, 9.
References
Adelman, Howard. 1966. Marcello Malpighi and the evolution of embryology, 5 vols. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Bacon, Francis. 1857–74. Works, 7 vols. ed. Robert L. Ellis, James Spedding, Douglas D. Heath. London: Longman.
Bianchi, Luca. 2003. Studi sull’aristotelismo del Cinquecento. Padua: Il Poligrafo.
Birch, Thomas. 1756–57. The history of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols. London.
Chapman, Alan. 2005. England’s Leonardo: Robert Hooke and the seventeenth-century scientific revolution. Bristol/Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing.
Clarke, Desmond. 1989. Occult powers and hypotheses: Cartesian natural philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon.
Descartes, René. 1964–74. Oeuvres, 12 vols., ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin.
———. 1984–91. The philosophical writings, 3 vols., Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Douglas Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Digby, Kenelm. 1644. Two treatises. London.
Draaisma, Douwe. 2000. Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2006. Hooke on memory and the memory of Hooke. In Robert Hooke: Tercentennial studies, ed. Michael Cooper and Michael Hunter, 111–121. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Farrington, Benjamin. 1964. The philosophy of Francis Bacon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Gassendi, Pierre. 1658. Opera omnia, 6 vols. Leiden.
Glanvill, Joseph.1665. Scepsis scientifica. London.
———. 1675. Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion. London.
Gunther, Robert T. 1968. Early science in Oxford, 15 vols. London: Dowsons of Pall Mall.
Harvey, William. 1651. Exercitationes de generatione animalium. Amsterdam.
———. 1847. The works of William Harvey. Trans. Robert Willis. London: Sydenham Society.
Henry, John. 1982. Atomism and eschatology: Catholicism and natural philosophy in the interregnum. British Journal for the History of Science 15: 211–239.
Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia. London: J. Martyn and J. Allestry.
———. 1677. Lampas. London: J. Martyn.
———. 1705. Posthumous works, ed. Richard Waller. London.
———. 1726. Philosophical experiments and observations, ed. William Derham. London.
Hunter, Michael. 1990. First steps in institutionalization: The role of the Royal Society of London. In Solomon’s house revisited: The organization and institutionalization of science, ed. Tore Frängsmyr, 13–29. Canton: Science History Publications.
———. 1995. Science and the shape of orthodoxy: Intellectual change in late seventeenth-century Britain. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.
Kassler, Jamie. 1995. Inner music: Hobbes, Hooke and North on internal character. London: Athlone.
Kessler, Eckhard. 2001. Metaphysics or empirical science? The two faces of Aristotelian natural philosophy in the sixteenth century. In Renaissance readings of the corpus aristotelicum, ed. Marianne Pade, 79–101. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Lewis, Rhodri. 2009. A kind of sagacity: Francis Bacon, the ars memoriae and the pursuit of natural knowledge. Intellectual History Review 19: 155–175.
Lovejoy, Arthur. 1936. The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacIntosh, Jack. 1983. Perception and imagination in Descartes, Boyle and Hooke. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 327–352.
Meschini, Franco. 1998. Neurofisiologia cartesiana. Firenze: Olschki.
Michael, Emily. 2000. Renaissance theories of body, soul, mind. In Psyche and soma: Physicians and metaphysicians on the mind-body problem from antiquity to enlightenment, ed. John P. Wright and Paul Potter, 147–172. Oxford: Clarendon.
Oldroyd, David. 1980. Some ‘Philosophical Scribbles’ attributed to Robert Hooke. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 35: 17–32.
Osler, Margaret. 1994. Divine will and the mechanical philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on contingency and necessity in the created world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petty, William. 2012. Of the scales of creatures. In William Petty on the order of nature: An unpublished manuscript treatise, ed. Rhodri Lewis, 93–199. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
Schmitt, Charles. 1983. Aristotle and the renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sgarbi, Marco. 2012. Towards a reassessment of British Aristotelianism. Vivarium 50: 85–109.
Singer, B.R. 1976. Robert Hooke on memory, association and time perception. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 31: 115–131.
Sutton, John. 2013. Body and soul. In The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. Peter Anstey, 285–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wear, Andrew. 1983. William Harvey and the ‘way of anatomists’. History of Science 21: 223–249.
Willis, Thomas. 1680. Opera omnia, 2 vols. Cologne
Wright, John. 1991. Locke, Willis and the seventeenth-century Epicurean soul. In Atoms, pneuma and tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European thought, ed. Margaret Osler, 239–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sacco, F.G. (2020). Human Understanding. In: Real, Mechanical, Experimental. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44450-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44451-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)