The Recognition Project: Feminist History of Philosophy

Part of the Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences book series (WHPS, volume 3)


The question “Why does the history of philosophy matter to feminist philosophy?” is a particular version of the question “Why does the history of philosophy matter to philosophy?” And the latter question opens up into debates over the methods and purposes of those philosophers who engage with the history of philosophy. But, of course, there is more than one way for the history of philosophy to matter. In this paper, I suggest that feminist historians of philosophy who are recovering the forgotten work of women philosophers are engaged in a project, which I call the recognition project. Furthermore, I argue that if we focus on the theme of recognition in both its epistemic and political aspects, we will be motivated to add “feminists” to the categorization of scholarly work in the history of philosophy.


  1. Alanen, L. (2004). Descartes and Elizabeth: A philosophical dialogue? In L. Alanen & C. Witt (Eds.), Feminist reflections on the history of philosophy.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, L., & Witt, C. (Eds.). (2004). Feminist reflections on the history of philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bourchert, D. (Ed.). (2005). The encyclopedia of philosophy (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, P. (Ed.). (1967). The encyclopedia of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Freeland, C. (2000). Feminism and ideology in ancient philosophy. Apeiron, XXXIII(4), 365–406.Google Scholar
  6. Huseyinzadegan, D. (2018). For what can the Kantian feminist hope? Constructive complicity in feminist appropriations of the Canon. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 4(1). Retrieved October 29 2018, from
  7. Kourany, J. (1998). Philosophy in a feminist voice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Laerke, M., Smith, Justin E. H., & Schliesser, E. (Eds.). (2013). Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. O’Neill, E. (1998). Disappearing ink: Early modern women philosophers and their fate in history. In J. Kourany (Ed.), Philosophy in a feminist voice.Google Scholar
  10. Shapiro, L. (2004). Some thoughts on the place of women in early modern philosophy. In L. Alanen & C. Witt (Eds.), Feminist reflections on the history of philosophy (pp. 219–250).Google Scholar
  11. Scharff, R. (2014). How history matters to philosophy: Reconsidering philosophy’s past after positivism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson, M. (1992). History of philosophy in philosophy today; and the case of the sensible qualities. Philosophical Review, 101(1), 191–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Witt, C. (2006). Feminist interpretations of the philosophical canon. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2).Google Scholar
  14. Witt, C., & Shapiro, L. (2018). Feminist history of philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations