Disrupting Settler Colonialism and Oppression in Media and Policy-Making: A View from the Community Media Advocacy Centre

King, Gretchen

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_6

Disrupting Settler Colonialism and Oppression in Media and Policy-Making: A View from the Community Media Advocacy Centre

Gretchen King⁵

Chapter
First Online: 02 September 2020

200 Accesses

Part of the Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series book series (GTMCR)

Abstract

The regulatory regimes that dictate media and telecommunications practices in Canada uphold the colonial settler state and do little to combat systemic racism in the media. This is in part due to communication policy-making processes that marginalize and disempower diverse communities. Too often policy makers and researchers neglect prioritizing the specific needs and rights of people who are racialized, Indigenous, or living with disAbilities to access and representation in media. Within this context, the Community Media Advocacy Centre (www.CMACentre.ca) was founded in 2015 to disrupt settler colonialism and oppression in the media. CMAC was co-founded by experienced media activists who worked for decades in the vibrant community and Indigenous broadcasting sectors within Canada. Today, CMAC is a registered nonprofit organization uniquely comprised of academics, lawyers, policy consultants, and media practitioners who prioritize the perspectives, voices, and lived experiences of Indigenous Peoples, racialized people, and people living with disAbilities. CMAC prioritizes these voices because they are underrepresented in the media landscape generally and noticeably absent from media policy processes. Through research, relationship-building, advocacy, and learning, CMAC works to foreground the experience and knowledge of people who are racialized, Indigenous, or living with disAbilities in media research and communication policy processes.

Keywords

Decolonizing
Media policy
Advocacy
Indigenous
Anti-racism

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 109.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 139.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 139.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
CMAC takes up the anti-oppressive practice used by some community media practitioners, like volunteer programmers with The Avalanche show that airs on CKUT Radio 90.3 FM in Montreal, to foreground the abilities of people who live with disAbilitites by capitalizing the ‘A’ in disAbility, disAbilities, and disAbled.
2.
The government of Canada previously used the term Aboriginal or Native to refer to First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people, whereas more recent state practice uses the term Indigenous. CMAC uses First Nations, Métis, and Inuit as well as Indigenous, while recognizing specific nation’s names where applicable.
3.
See https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/110.nsf/eng/00009.html.
4.
See https://web.archive.org/web/20181009170338/http://journalismstrategies.ca/en/ and https://utorontopress.com/ca/journalism-in-crisis-2.
5.
See https://archive.org/details/FutureFNIMBroadcasting.
6.
See https://web.archive.org/web/20180812100052/http://indigenousradio.ca/Open-Access-Resources.php.

References

Abramson, D., Shtern, J., & Taylor, G. (2008). “More and better” research? Critical communication studies and the problem of policy relevance. Canadian Journal of Communication, 33(2), 303–317. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2008v33n2a1977.
Albinati, C., Bonin-Labelle, G., Buddle, K., Gagnon, J., King, G., & Szwarc, J. (2019). Recommendations for a new consultation process and policy for First Nations, Inuit and Métis Broadcasting (Final Report). Retrieved from https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/39010.
Awada, L., Balsara, A., Bogdani, K., Charon, A., Delchop, J., Dobrea. A., Farley, O., Genest, P., Guo, M., Hindieh, R., Huebener, S., Mccann, E., Peets, S., Point, C., Thiolat, I., van Abbema, A., & Wolfe, M. (2017). CMAC final project—“Policy proposal.” COMS 355: Media Governance, McGill University.
Google Scholar
Bateman, K., & Karim, K. (2009). Canadian legislation, regulations, and guidelines on the representation of diversity. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 741–748. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2009v34n4a2294.
Broadcasting Act, c. 11 S.C. 1991, c. 11. (1991). Retrieved from https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/b-9.01/.
Clemens, K., & CMAC. (2017). The future of indigenous radio centering sovereignty in CRTC policy-making (Conference Presentation). The Future of First Nations, Inuit and Métis Broadcasting, University of Ottawa.
Google Scholar
CMAC. (2016, May 12–15). Building media and technology advocacy skills (Panel Presentation). Media Activism Research Conference at Lakehead University in Orillia. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJUiybM9c48.
CMAC. (2018a). About [website]. Retrieved from http://cmacentre.ca.
CMAC. (2018b). Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2017-359-2, and 2017-359-3; Call for comments on the Governor in Council’s request for a report on future programming distribution models—Second phase of comments. Retrieved from https://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/DocWebBroker/OpenDocument.aspx?DMID=3068520.
CMAC. (2018c). Letter to welcome the Honourable Pablo Rodriguez. Retrieved from https://wp.me/p9HjvN-8S.
CMAC. (2019). Round table: Mobilizing knowledge to transform media governance. Canadian Communication Association, University of British Columbia. Retrieved from http://cmac.gwradio.koumbit.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Script-CMAC-Intervention-at-CCA-2019-Roundtable.pdf.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
CrossRef Google Scholar
CRTC. (1990). Native broadcasting policy, Public Notice CRTC 1990-89. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1990/pb90-89.htm.
CRTC. (1999). Ethnic broadcasting policy, Public Notice CRTC 1999-117. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/1999/pb99-117.htm.
CRTC. (2005). Commission’s response to the report of the Task Force for Cultural Diversity on Television, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2005-24. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2005/pb2005-24.htm.
CRTC. (2006). Commission’s response to the Canadian Association of Broadcasters’ final report on the presence, portrayal and participation of persons with disabilities in television programming, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-77. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2006/pb2006-77.htm.
CRTC. (2010). Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-959. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-959.htm.
CRTC. (2015). Three-year plan 2015–2018. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.507839/publication.html.
CRTC. (2018a). Collaboration opportunities with the CRTC. Email Communique.
Google Scholar
CRTC. (2018b). Harnessing change: The future of programming distribution in Canada. Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/s15/.
Dagron, A. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef Google Scholar
FPRC. (2016). Appointments to the CRTC (Report). Forum for Research and Policy in Communications. Retrieved from http://frpc.net/appointments-to-the-crtc/.
Gasher, M., Brin, C., Crowther, C., King, G., Salamon, E., & Thibault, S. (Eds.). (2016). Journalism in crisis: Bridging theory and practice for democratic media strategies in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar
Girard, B. (1992). A Passion for radio: Radio waves and community. Montreal: Black Rose.
Google Scholar
Gumucio‐Dagron, A. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change: A report to the Rockefeller Foundation. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
Google Scholar
Gumucio-Dagron, A. (2014). Indigenous communication. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 108–124). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J. (2012). Voicing the slum: Youth, community media and social change in Nairobi (PhD dissertation). Department of Media Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-75472.
Hill Collins, P. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Howley, K. (Ed.). (2010). Understanding community media. Los Angeles: Sage.
Google Scholar
ISED. (2018, September 25). Broadcasting and Telecommunications Panel launches consultations. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/110.nsf/eng/00004.html.
King, G. (2017a). History of struggle: The global story of community broadcasting practices, or a brief history of community radio. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 12(2), 18–36. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.227.
King, G. (2017b). The history of “policying” indigenous broadcasting and current contexts (Class Lecture). CMN 5105: Contemporary Communication Issues, lecture conducted from University of Ottawa.
Google Scholar
King, G., & Rahemtullah, O. S. (2019). Community radio contradictions in Canada: Learning from volunteers impacted by commercialising policies and practices. Journal of Alternative and Community Media, 4(4), 20–36. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00064_1.
Langlois, A., & Dubois, F. (Eds.). (2005). Autonomous media: Activating resistance and dissent. Montréal: AK Press.
Google Scholar
Lentz, B. (2009, October 30). Regulation is boring. FlowTV, 11(1). Retrieved from http://flowtv.org/2009/10/regulation-is-boringbecky-lentz-mcgill-university/.
McNally, M. B., Mowatt, B., & Pintos, L. (2014). Canadian participation in the spectrum management consultation process: Involvement, indifference, or exclusion? Journal of Information Policy, 4, 296–326. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.4.2014.0296.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Meadows, M. (2009). Electronic dreaming tracks: Indigenous community broadcasting in Australia. Development in Practice, 19(4–5), 514–524.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Meadows, M., Forde, S., Ewart, J., & Foxwell, K. (2008). A quiet revolution: Australian community broadcasting audiences speak out. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 129(1), 20–32.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Olorunnisola, A. A. (2002). Community radio: Participatory communication in postapartheid South Africa. Journal of Radio Studies, 9(1), 126–145.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Padovani, C., and Calabrese, A. (Eds.). (2014). Communication Rights and Social Justice: Historical Accounts of Transnational Mobilizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Raboy, M. (1995). The role of public consultation in shaping the Canadian broadcasting system. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 28(3), 455–477.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Radiocommunication Act, c. R-2. (1985). Retrieved from https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/R-2/page-1.html#h-1.
Rajabiun, R., & Middleton, C. (2013). Rural broadband development in Canada’s provinces: An overview of policy approaches. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 8(2), 7–22.
Google Scholar
Rennie, E. (2006). Community media: A global introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: An international study of citizens’ media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Google Scholar
Salter, L. R. L., & Odartey-Wellington, F., with Pavri-Garcia, V. (2008). The CRTC and broadcasting regulation in Canada. Toronto: Thomson-Carswell.
Google Scholar
Segura, M. S., & Waisbord, S. (2016). Media movements: Civil society and media policy reform in Latin America. London: Zed Books.
Google Scholar
Shepherd, T., Taylor, G., & Middleton, C. (2014). A tale of two regulators: Telecom policy participation in Canada. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.4.2014.0001.
Szwarc, J. (2018). Indigenous broadcasting and the CRTC: Lessons from the licensing of Native Type B Radio (CRTC Prize for Excellence in Policy Research). Retrieved from https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/acrtc/prx/2018szwarc.htm.
Telecommunications Act, c. 38. (1993). Retrieved from https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/t-3.4/.
Thiessen, C. (2019, July 5). First Indigenous woman CRTC commissioner appointed. Broadcast Dialogue. Retrieved from https://broadcastdialogue.com/first-indigenous-woman-crtc-commissioner-appointed/.
TRC. (2015). Calls to action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Retrieved from http://templatelab.com/truth-and-reconciliation-commission-calls-to-action/.
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 409–428.
Google Scholar
UN. (2007a). United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/RES/61/295.
UN. (2007b). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html.
UNESCO. (2005). Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31038&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
Wawatay Communications Society with Albinati, C., Bonin, G., Buddle, K., Gagnon, J., & King, G. (2017). Appropriating communication policy with the Future of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Broadcasting: Conversation & Convergence. Paper presentation at the International Association for Media and Communication Research annual conference in Cartagena, Colombia.
Google Scholar
Williams, A. (2015). The pass system [Motion picture]. Canada: Tamarack Productions.
Google Scholar
Women in View. (2019). On screen (5th Report). Retrieved from http://womeninview.ca/wp-content/uploads/WIVOS19-Full-Report.pdf.
Yu, S. (2016). Instrumentalization of ethnic media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 41(2), 343–351. Retrieved from https://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/3019/3214.
Zweiri, M. (2012). Jordan’s local radio revolution: Progress, challenges, and possibilities. In M. Zweiri & E. Murphy (Eds.), The New Arab media: Technology, image and perception (Reprint ed., pp. 139–153). Reading: Ithaca Press.
Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Gretchen King

Authors

Gretchen King
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Lakehead University, Orilla, ON, Canada
Assoc. Prof. Sandra Jeppesen
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
Dr. Paola Sartoretto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

King, G. (2020). Disrupting Settler Colonialism and Oppression in Media and Policy-Making: A View from the Community Media Advocacy Centre. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_6

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_6
Published: 02 September 2020
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44388-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44389-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)