Abstract
This chapter addresses dilemmas and strategies in dealing with ethical risks in ethnographic research. Based on the authors’ research processes on social movement media in Brazil, we compare dilemmas arising from relationships—as Europe-based Brazilian researchers—with activists in Brazil. The widespread uses of digital media in political demonstrations and protests have created epistemological and methodological challenges to research on communication for development and social change. A key challenge lies in the relationship between the researchers and the researched. As Brazilian researchers in European institutions, we become mediators of knowledge about Brazil and Latin America among research communities in Europe, experiencing ethical dilemmas regarding how we represent the groups about which we do research. We compare our experiences researching the communicative processes and media practices in the Brazilian Landless Workers’ Movement and the trajectories in media activism of low-income youth in favelas of Rio de Janeiro, focusing on four different areas: (a) overcoming suspicion and resistance to researchers among activists; (b) justifying research to activists; (c) balance between science and advocacy; and (d) collaboration and dialogue. We conclude that by engaging in activist research, we become mediators between two realms of knowledge and action: academia and social movements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
André Constantine, May 2013. The speech, in Portuguese, is accessible here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8UnW9Ws07A (last accessed in January 17, 2020).
- 2.
See more information at https://orecomm.net/.
References
Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247.
Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Custódio, L. (2017). Favela media activism: Counterpublics for human rights in Brazil. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Downing, J. D. H. (Ed.). (2011). Encyclopedia of social movement media. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Freire, P. (2018/1967). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hale, C. R. (Ed.). (2008). Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. London: University of California Press.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York: Routledge.
Hunter, L., Emerald, E., & Martin, G. (2013). Participatory activist research in the globalised world: Social change through the cultural professions. New York: Springer.
Jeppesen, S., Kruzynski, A., Lakoff, A., & Sarrasin, R. (2014). Grassroots autonomous media practices: A diversity of tactics. Journal of Media Practice, 15(1), 21–38.
Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the internet. London: Routledge.
Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: Wiring social change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milan, S. (2014). The ethics of social movement research. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 446–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagar, R. (2003). Collaboration across borders: Moving beyond positionality. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24(3), 356–372.
Reguillo, R. (2017). Paisajes insurrectos: jóvenes, redes y revueltas en el otoño civilizatorio [Insurrectional landscapes: Youth, networks and uprisings in the civilisation autumn]. Ned Ediciones.
Rodriguez, C., Ferron, B., & Shamas, K. (2014). Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. Media, Culture and Society, 36(2), 150–166.
Sartoretto, P. M. (2016). Between opportunities and threats—An analysis of Brazilian Landless Workers’ movement experiences with new media technologies. Observatorio (OBS*), 10(ESPECIAL).
Sartoretto, P. (2015). Voices from the margins: People, media, and the struggle for land in Brazil (Doctoral diss. ed.). Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (Eds.). (2010). An Introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. London: Routledge.
Shukaitis, S., & Graeber, D. (Eds.). (2007). Constituent imagination: Militant investigations, collective theorizations. Oakland: AK Press.
Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385.
Thomas, P. (2015). Communication for social change, making theory count. Nordicom Review, 36(Special Issue), 71–78.
Tufte, T. (2013). Towards a renaissance in communication for social change: Redefining the discipline and practice in the post ‘Arab Spring’ era. In T. Tufte, N. Windermuth, A. S. Hansen-Skovmoes, & W. Mitullah (Eds.), Speaking up or talking back? Media, empowerment and civic engagement among east and Southern African youth (pp. 19–36). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Tufte, T. (2017). Communication for social change: A citizen perspective. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sartoretto, P., Custódio, L. (2020). Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas in Activist Research on Social Movement Media. In: Jeppesen, S., Sartoretto, P. (eds) Media Activist Research Ethics. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44389-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44388-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44389-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)