Abstract
The case has been made in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for the crucial role of the built environment in mitigating the worst excesses of a warming global climate and in protecting people through adaptation. Town planners are essential actors in delivering sustainable and resilient urbanism. Given that legislation is implemented by people, the study aimed to examine how town planners experienced and thought about the changing legislation and how they understood the concepts of ‘sustainability’ and ‘resilience’ in the built environment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 planners working in England who had at least 7 years’ experience. In the analysis, we explored meanings of sustainability and of resilience, and how these concepts were seen as incorporated in legislation. Sustainability was seen by the participants as embedded in regulations but its realisation varied substantially. Tensions were evident between the three pillars of environment, society and economy. ‘Resilience’ as a concept was poorly understood and legislative support was patchy at best: while flooding features extensively in local plans, wider issues of climate impact such as overheating are not comprehensively addressed. The conclusions are that planners are often frustrated in their attempts to develop a more sustainable built environment and that the current planning system is inadequate to deliver consistently sustainable and resilient outcomes. However, alignment between sustainability goals and professional identity were also noted, offering avenues to explore beyond the institutional constraints of legislation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Burke, P. J., & Stryker, S. (2016). Identity theory: Progress in relating the two strands. In J. Stets & R. Serpe (Eds.). New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 658–682). New York: Oxford University Press.
DEFRA. (2017). UK climate change risk assessment 2017. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-change-risk-assessment-2017
Duffy, P. B., Field, C. B., Diffenbaugh, N. S., Doney, S. C., Dutton, Z., Goodman, S., … Williams, A. P. (2019). Strengthened scientific support for the Endangerment Finding for atmospheric greenhouse gases. Science, 363(6427):eaat5982.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
Funfgeld, H., & McEvoy, D. (2013). Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 324–328.
Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5’C. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/
Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risks. Cities, 31, 220–229.
Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robert, K.-H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 14(1), 60–66.
Lucon, O., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Zain Ahmed, A., Akbari, H., Bertoldi, P., Cabeza, L. F., ... Vilariño, M. V. (2014). Buildings. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poku-Boansi, M., & Cobbinah, P. B. (2018). Are we planning for resilient cities in Ghana? An analysis of policy and planners’ perspectives. Cities, 72, 252–260.
Porter, L., & Davoudi, S. (2013). The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 329–333.
Quigley, M., Blair, N., & Davison, K. (2018). Articulating a social-ecological resilience agenda for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 23(4), 581–602.
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Hohne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., … Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2’C. Nature, 534, 631–639.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Shaw, K. (2013). “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 308–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Murtagh, N., Odeleye, ND., Maidment, C. (2020). Does the Planning System in England Deliver a Sustainable and Resilient Built Environment? A Study of the Experience of Town Planners. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)