Skip to main content

Construction Programme Failure and the Impact on Waste, Resource Efficiency, and Natural Capital in Construction Project Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Abstract

Delayed and disrupted construction projects contribute poor sustainability in construction project environments. UK construction documents an extensive history of project delay and disruption, with contracting organisations operating in environments with a prevalence of excessive sub-letting, fragmentation, poor integration of sub-contractors, build strategy dislocation, contractual-adversarial relationships, and poor adoption of project planning frameworks.

This investigation reviews the extent and impact of individual and team behaviours and cultures within a contracting organisation project and the influences on the success of Critical Path Method (CPM) project planning and scheduling. CPM remains the standard method of project planning and scheduling in the construction industry, despite newer systems such as Lean Construction, Last PlannerĀ® System, Agile Project Management, and PRINCE2.

Exploratory qualitative data was collected through a purposive sample of six semi-structured interviews with UK construction management personnel on a sample case study project. Experienced project managers and project planning staff from contracting and sub-contracting organisations were consulted on project planning, scheduling and programme development, co-ordination, integration, procedures, methods, techniques, training, and development.

Results identify CPM planning operating in unstructured environments characterised by poor operating and application protocols, and poor understanding and ad hoc engagement by project teams. Poor leadership and facilitation of programme development by senior project management could be associated with later project failure. It is concluded that fundamental problems with basic project planning and scheduling undermine sustainability in construction due to late completions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammar, M. A. (2012). LOB and CPMP integrated method for scheduling repetitive projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 44ā€“50.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Association of Project Management (Ed.). (2012). APM body of knowledge (6th ed.). Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire: Association of Project Management.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Aquilano, N. J., & Smith, D. E. (1980). A formal set of algorithms for project scheduling with critical path scheduling/material requirements planning. Journal of Operations Management, 1(2), 57ā€“67.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ballard, H.G., 2000. The last planner system of production control. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • British Standards Institution. (2010). BS6079-1:2010: Project management. Principles and guidelines for the management of projects. Retrieved April 20, 2018, from https://www.shop.bsigroup.com/.

  • Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB). (2008). A research on managing the risk of delayed completion in the 21st century. Ascot: CIOB.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CIOB. (2016). Code of practice for programme management in the built environment. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Daniel, E.I., Pasquire, C., & Dickens, G., (2014, September). Social perspective of planning in construction: The UK experience. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction (ARCOM) Conference (pp. 1ā€“3).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction. London: Department of Environment, Transport and the Region.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Fondahl, J. W. (1962). A non-computer approach to the critical path method for the construction industry. Stanford, CA: Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Gibson, G. E., Jr., Wang, Y. R., Cho, C. S., & Pappas, M. P. (2006). What is preproject planning, anyway? Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(1), 35ā€“42.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kelley, J. E., Jr. (1961). Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Operations Research, 9(3), 296ā€“320.

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kog, Y. C., Chua, D. K. H., Loh, P. K., & Jaselskis, E. J. (1999). Key determinants for construction schedule performance. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 351ā€“359.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team. London: HMSO.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Laufer, A., & Tucker, R. L. (1987). Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3), 243ā€“266.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lester, A. (2006). Project management, planning and control: managing engineering, construction and manufacturing projects to PMI, APM and BSI standards. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Livengood, J.C. (2016). Use of project schedules and the critical path method in claims. In Construction contract claims, changes, and dispute resolution (pp. 175ā€“200).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tommelein, I. D., Riley, D. R., & Howell, G. A. (1999). Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), 304ā€“310.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Winch, G. M., & Kelsey, J. (2005). What do construction project planners do? International Journal of Project Management, 23(2), 141ā€“149.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Pickavance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pickavance, N., Ross, A., Fearon, D. (2020). Construction Programme Failure and the Impact on Waste, Resource Efficiency, and Natural Capital in Construction Project Environments. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics