Skip to main content

Who Are the ‘Middle Actors’ in Sustainable Construction and What Do They Need to Know?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Abstract

This paper explores what knowledge and skills are needed, and how those skills and knowledge might be gained, in order to deliver more sustainable outcomes from construction, using the concept of ‘middle actors’. ‘Middle actors’ are the individuals who occupy the space between ‘top-down’ policy and instruction, and ‘bottom-up’ norms. In construction, ‘middle actors’ with influence on building performance include clerks of works, project managers, tradespeople and technical advisers.

There is a relentless drive for more sustainable buildings that use less energy, generate less waste during construction and use, and provide healthy environments for people to live and work in. This direction of travel can no longer be considered ‘new’ and yet it remains far from the mainstream. To create buildings which are sustainable, we need to consider not only technology and design changes, but how to alter the wider system of construction. We use middle actors as the lens through which to examine these non-technical changes, and the skills and knowledge required to achieve them.

A review of the concept of middle actors as it has been applied to construction and an overview of skills and knowledge needs for sustainable construction is followed by identifying middle actors in new build and retrofit, commercial and domestic projects currently under way with one developer in Leeds, UK. The skills and knowledge needed by ‘middle actors’ to deliver more sustainable outcomes from their projects are described, based on empirical data gathered from project teams, and further structured by considering when in the project cycle they are needed, and what routes to gaining the required skills and knowledge might be most effective. This analysis reinforces that there is no single route to achieving more sustainable buildings and instead the activities, responsibilities and networks of individuals need to be carefully considered in developing training programmes for construction teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2013). UK construction, an economic analysis for the sector. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • BTEC. (2017) BTEC Higher Nationals Construction and the Built Environment (2017)—RQF Programme Specification Issue 6. Retrieved April 11, 2019 from https://qualifications.pearson.com/en/qualifications/btec-higher-nationals/construction-and-the-built-environment-2017.html

  • Cauvain, J., & Karvonen, A. (2018). Social housing providers as unlikely low-carbon innovators. Energy and Buildings, 177, 394–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L., Gleeson, C., & Winch, C. (2017). What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction? Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLC (2017). Construction Leadership Council’s Sustainable Training Guide, London. Available at: https://www.constructionleadershipcouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Sustainable-Building-Training-Guide.pdf.

  • Committee on Climate Change. (2019). UK housing: Fit for the future? London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P., Batel, S., Aas, O., Sovacool, B., Labelle, M. C., & Ruud, A. (2017). A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage. Energy Policy, 107, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. (2013). Exploring the time dimension of low carbon retrofit: Owner-occupied housing. Building Research and Information, 42(4), 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T., & Killip, G. (2014). Anatomy of low carbon retrofits: Evidence from owner-occupied Superhomes. Building Research and Information, 42(4), 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., & Guy, S. (2009). Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings. Urban Studies, 46, 2577–2594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesekam, J., Barrett, J. R., & Taylor, P. (2016). Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Building Research and Information, 44(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, M., & Spence, A. (2015). Caught in the middle: The role of the Facilities Manager in organisational energy use. Energy Policy, 85, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, H. (2019). An insider’s point of view: Autoethnography in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics., 37, 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J., Mayne, R., Parag, Y., & Bergman, N. (2014). Scaling up local carbon action: The role of partnerships, networks and policy. Carbon Management, 5(4), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B. (1998). Building change: Effects of professional culture and organizational context on energy efficiency adoption in buildings. PhD dissertation, Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B. (1999). Re-inscribing design work: Architects, engineers, and efficiency advocates. In Proceedings of ECEEE Summer Study, June 1–6, 2009, Mandelieu, France (Vol. 2, pp. 3.11.1–3.11.10). Stockholm: European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B. (2017). Rafting sustainability in iconic skyscrapers: A system of building professions in transition? Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 5(2), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B., & Killip, G. (2013). Building expertise: Renovation as professional innovation. In A. J. Hoffman & R. Henn (Eds.), Constructing green: The social structures of sustainability (pp. 35–55). Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B., Killip, G., & Fawcett, T. (2014). Reducing carbon from the ‘middle-out’: The role of builders in domestic refurbishment. Buildings, 4(4), 911–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. B., & Parag, Y. (2013). A middle-out approach for improving energy performance in buildings. Building Research and Information, 41(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killip, G., Owen, A., Morgan, E., & Topouzi, M. (2018). A co-evolutionary approach to understanding construction industry innovation in renovation practices for low-carbon outcomes. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 19, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killip, G., Owen, A., & Topouzi, M. (2020). Exploring the practices of UK construction manufacturers and merchants in relation to housing energy retrofit. Journal of Cleaner Production. 251, April 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119205

  • Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: Systematic case study review. Energy Efficiency, 11, 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A. (2015). Missing the point—The challenge of creating policies and programmes that tap into the motivations of the builders and installers. In eceee 2015 Summer Study proceedings: First Fuel Now, June 1–6, 2015, Presqu’ile St Giens, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parag, Y., & Janda, K. B. (2014). More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out”. Energy Research and Social Science, 3, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Tutt, D., & Dainty, A. (2013). Ethnographic research in the construction industry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindl, K. (2017). Implementing energy measures in renovations for multi-family dwellings: Influence and practice of professionals. Doctoral thesis, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIBA. (2013). Plan of work. Available at https://www.ribaplanofwork.com/

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K. (2017). Energy efficiency refurbishment of UK homes: The householders’ perspective. PhD thesis, Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K., & Owen, A. (2019). Sustainable construction: Required skills and processes identified by networked industry actors in Leeds, UK. In ARCOM Conference, Leeds, September 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K., Owen, A., & Chatterton, P. (2018). Equipping construction workers with sustainable building skills: A focus on Leeds. SRI Briefing Note No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, J., & Hauge, Å. L. (2014). Barriers and drivers for energy efficient upgrade of single-family housing in Norway. In Sustainable Building Conference, Barcelona, October 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunshelle, K., Denizou, K., Hauge, A., & Thomsen, J. (2018). Robust and reliable technology concepts and business models for triggering deep renovation and residential buildings in EU (4RinEU): Protocol for participative deep renovation design and user motivation. Retrieved April 10, 2019 from http://4rineu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/4RinEU_WP3_20181031_D3.5_Protocol-for-partecip-deep-renov-design-user-motivation.pdf

  • Wade, F., Hitchings, R., & Shipworth, M. (2016). Understanding the missing middlemen of domestic heating: Installers as a community of professional practice in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, F., Murtagh, N., & Hitchings, R. (2018). Managing professional jurisdiction and domestic energy use. Building Research and Information, 46, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZCH. (2014). Closing the gap between design and as-built performance. Evidence Review Report. London: Zero Carbon Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZCH. (2015). Builder’s book: An illustrated guide to building energy efficient homes. London: Zero Carbon Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZCH. (2016a). Services guide: An illustrated guide to building services in new homes. London: Zero Carbon Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZCH. (2016b). Thermal bridging guide: An introductory guide to thermal bridging in homes. London: Zero Carbon Hub.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has been sponsored by the Leeds Social Sciences Impact Acceleration Account in association with the ESRC and the University of Leeds EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account. The authors are grateful to CEG and the Leeds College of Building as project partners and to Phil Dyke at CEG and Brian Duffy at LCoB in particular. K. Janda is grateful to the UK Energy Research Centre for initial work on middle actors and the Centre for Energy Epidemiology at University College London for recent developments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Owen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Owen, A., Janda, K.B., Simpson, K. (2020). Who Are the ‘Middle Actors’ in Sustainable Construction and What Do They Need to Know?. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics