Skip to main content

Delivering Energy Savings for the Supply Chain Through Building Information Modelling as a Result of the Horizon 2020 Energy BIMcert Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Abstract

The global buildings sector is now responsible for 40% of final energy consumption and is accounting for 33% of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. This has resulted in a growing urgency to address energy and emissions from buildings and construction, to meet restrictive 2020 targets as specified by the European Union (EU). To achieve these targets a number of funding initiatives have been put in place through Horizon 2020 with a focus on BIM, due to it having the potential to rapidly produce energy outputs that enable design teams to analyse and compare the most cost-effective, energy-efficient options. However, despite the recorded benefits that BIM can bring to the design, there is still a lack of understanding of how it can be used on site by the supply chain to impact energy savings directly. In order to address this industry-wide concern a Multi-International consortium, bid, won and then launched the Horizon 2020 Energy BIMcert project in March 2018 with the goal to educate all areas of the supply chain in the use of BIM, so as to achieve better energy efficiency during the design, construction and ongoing maintenance of an asset. An online platform will be launched in September 2019, which will deliver blended training that combines theory, practice and eLearning that will enable workers to train more effectively. This paper will explore the initial stages of this project and will focus on how the findings from a survey and series of workshops conducted within the member states of the Energy BIMcert consortium have helped establish the training needs of the industry. These findings were cross-referenced with a state-of-the-art literature review on BIM pedagogy, which has resulted in the formation of the curriculum and learning outcomes for a number of BIM focused training units. Further to this, the paper will discuss how the delivery of the blended training and associated materials will affect current energy saving targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdirad, H., & Dossick, C. (2016). BIM curriculum design in architecture, engineering, and construction education: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, ITcon, 21, 250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamu, Z. A., and Thorpe, T. (2016) How Universities are Teaching BIM: A Review and Case Study from the UK. ITcon. 21, 121–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Kadiri, K. O., Akinade, O. O., Bilal, M., Owolabi, H. A., & Alaka, H. A. (2016). Competency-based measures for designing out construction waste: Task and contextual attributes, Engineering. Construction and Architectural Management, 23(4), 464–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badrinath, A. C., Chang, Y. T., & Hsieh, S. H. (2016). A review of tertiary BIM education for advanced engineering communication with visualization. Visualization in Engineering, 4(9), 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T., Jaselskis, E., & McDermott, C. (2011). Implications of construction industry trends on the educational requirements for future construction professionals. In International Conference Proceedings of the 47th Associated Schools of Construction, Omaha, Nebraska, United States, April 6–9 (pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enshassi, A., Ayash, A., & Mohamed, S. (2018). Factors driving contractors to implement energy management strategies in construction projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 23(3), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, R., & Lownes-Jackson, M. (2013). Web-based tutorials and traditional face-to-face lectures: A comparative analysis of student performance. Informing Science and Information Technology, 10, 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaradat, S. (2014). Educating the next generation of architects for interdisciplinary BIM environments. In Proceedings of the AAE International Conference on Architectural Education: Common Currency, University of Sheffield, September 3–5 (pp. 127–135).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäväjä, P., & Salin, J. (2014). BIM education: Implementing and reviewing “OpeBIM”—BIM for Teachers. In Proceedings of the Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Orlando, Florida, June 23–25 (pp. 2151–2158).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, B., Behan, A., McCormack, P., Hamilton, A., Rebelo, E., Neilson, B., ... Borkovic, T. (2019). Improving the sustainability of the built environment by training its workforce in more efficient and greener ways of designing and constructing through the Horizon 2020 Energy BIMcert Project. In Proceedings of the CitA BIM Gathering, Galway, September 26–27 (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozumba, A. O. U., & Shakantu, W. (2017). Exploring challenges to ICT utilisation in construction site management. Construction Innovation, 18(3), 1471–4175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puolitaival, T., & Forsythe, P. (2016). Practical challenges of BIM education. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, R., Eastman, E., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelbourn, M., Macdonald, J., McCuen, T., & Lee, S. (2017). Students perceptions of BIM education in the higher education sector a UK and USA perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 31(5), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Luo, Y. (2016). Pedagogy and assessment of student learning in BIM and sustainable design and construction. ITcon, 21, 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., & Azar, E. R. (2018). BIM-based energy consumption assessment of the onsite construction of building structural systems. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(1), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

McAuley, B. et al. (2020). Delivering Energy Savings for the Supply Chain Through Building Information Modelling as a Result of the Horizon 2020 Energy BIMcert Project. In: Scott, L., Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44381-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics