Abstract
A greater proportion of international aid spending is targeted towards conflict-affected and fragile environments. Concurrently, donors have higher standards for evidence of what programs are effective. The combination of these two trends provides social psychologists with ample opportunity to understand whether and under what conditions some core theories, such as the contact hypothesis and social identity theory, apply in the field. However, rigorously evaluating the effectiveness of development programs in conflict environments, particularly peacebuilding programs, through Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), comes with numerous challenges. These include (1) insecurity and consistent access to populations; (2) ethics of randomization especially, during a humanitarian crisis; and (3) how to maintain the integrity of a program and research design within a changing context. As a result, implementers are often resistant to conducting RCTs. Based on my experience as a scholar-practitioner, I describe the benefits of RCTs that implementers may be unaware of, such as how RCTs help disentangle the impacts of the program from the changing context, as well as how to address the most common concerns of implementers. The hope is that by better understanding and addressing implementers’ concerns, researchers will have more opportunities to rigorously test programs and theories, simultaneously improving theory and peacebuilding and development interventions globally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
When I use “we” in this chapter, I’m referring to my colleagues at Mercy Corps and/or other research collaborators.
- 2.
The herders we worked with migrated regularly.
- 3.
There are also donor considerations that often affect this decision, which I describe below.
- 4.
A potential downside of this approach for some people may be the seemingly lack of independence between the implementers and researchers. This is a risk, however, given how much data is often collected by implementers that is not used effectively, and with a bit more investment people could learn so much more, it feels worth investing in these studies in under less than ideal conditions.
- 5.
I believe some form of payment, whether in cash or in kind, should be standard for all implementers when collecting data. People’s time is valuable. It may also help implementers be more intentional about how they use the data they collect given the added cost.
- 6.
The early stages of the conflict in the Central Africa Republic were a rare example of when peacebuilding and humanitarian programs were being implemented simultaneously.
- 7.
RCTs on unconditional cash transfers have largely been studied in more stable contexts, not in the midst of conflict (Blattman et al. 2017).
References
3IE (2015). Peacebuilding evidence gap map. Retrieved from: http://gapmaps.3ieimpact.org/evidence-maps/evidence-peacebuilding-evidence-gap-map.
Alfadhli, K. & Drury, J. (2020). On the borders: Research with refugees of conflict. In Y. Acar, S. M. Moss, & Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict and power in the field: Methodological challenges and opportunities (pp. 129–148). Peace Psychology Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and race relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 245–280). New York, NY: Pergamon.
Baird, S., Hicks, J. H., Kremer, M., & Miguel, E. (2016). Worms at work: Long-run impacts of a child health investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1637–1680. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw022
Banerjee, A. & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., and Udry, C. (2015a). A multi-faceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science, 348(6236), 1260799. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799
Banerjee, A., Karlan, D. & Zinman, J. (2015b). Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20140287
Bayad, A. & Aydemir, A. (2020). When research, identity and context merge: A reflexive assessment on studying peace during conflict. In Y. Acar, S. M. Moss, & Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict and power in the field: Methodological challenges and opportunities (pp. 283–300). Peace Psychology Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Beaman, L., Hershkovitz, S., Keleher, N. & Macgruder (forthcoming). Stay in the dame: A randomized controlled trial of a sports and life skills program for vulnerable youth in Liberia. Economic Development and Cultural Change.
Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2015). Do mass media interventions effectively promote peace in contexts of ongoing violence? Evidence from Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(4), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000124
Blattman, C. & Annan, J. (2016). Can employment reduce lawlessness and rebellion? A field experiment with high-risk men in a fragile state. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000520
Blattman, C., Faye, M., Karlan, D., Niehus, P., & Urdy, C. (2017a). Cash as capital. Stanford Social Innovation Review (Summer), 57–58. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/cash_as_capital?utm_source=Enews&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=SSIR_Now&utm_content=Title
Blattman, C., Fiala, N., & Martinez, S. (2014). Generating skilled self-employment in developing countries: Experimental evidence from Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 697–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt057
Blattman, C., Fiala, N., & Martinez, S. (forthcoming). The long-term impacts of grants on poverty: 9-year evidence from the Youth Opportunities Program in Uganda. American Economic Review: Insights.
Blattman, C., Jamison, J., & Sheridan, M. (2017b). Reducing crime and violence: Experimental evidence from cognitive behavioral therapy in Liberia. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1165–1206. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150503
Blattman, C., & Ralston, L. (2015). Generating employment in poor and fragile states: Evidence from labor market and entrepreneurship programs. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2622220
Brück, T., Ferguson, N., Izzi, V., & Stojetz, W. (2016). Jobs aid peace. Berlin, Germany: International Security and Development Center.
Christensen, D., Dube, O., Haushofer, J., Siddiqi, B., & Voors, M. (2020). Healthcare Delivery during Crises: Experimental Evidence from Sierra Leone’s Ebola Outbreak. Working Paper.
Cillers, J., Dube, O., & Siddiqui, B. (2016). Reconciling after civil conflict increases social capital but reduces individual wellbeing. Science, 352(6287), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9682
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf064
Cronin-Furman, K. & Lake, M. (2018). Ethics abroad: Field work in fragile and violent contexts. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000379
Dionne, K.Y., Harawa, A., & Honde, H. (2015). The ethics of exclusion when experimenting in impoverished settings. In Desposato, S. (ed). Ethics and experiments in political science (pp. 25–41). New York, NY: Routledge.
Desposato, S. (2015). Ethics and experiments in political science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ditlmann, R. K., & Samii, C. (2016). Can intergroup contact affect ingroup dynamics? Insights from a field study with Jewish and Arab-Palestinian youth in Israel. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000217
Duflo, E., & Banarjee, A. (2017). Handbook of field experiments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
Dupas, P. & Cohen, J. (2010). Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1080301.
Dunning, T., Grossman, G., Humphreys, M., Hyde, S., McIntosh, C., & Nellis, G. (2019). Information, accountability, and cumulative learning: Lessons from Metaketa I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enos, R. (2014). Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3699–3704. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317670111
Galinsky, A., & Moskowitz, G. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708.
Goldstone, J. (2010). The New Population Bomb: The Four Megatrends That Will Change the World. Foreign Affairs, 89(1), 31–43.
Gubler, J. (2011). The micro-motives of intergroup aggression: A case study in Israel. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Figueiredo, A., Montagna, P., & Rocha, C. (2020). Data collection with indigenous people: Fieldwork experiences from Chile. In Y. G. Acar, S. M. Moss, & Ö. M. Uluğ (Eds.), Researching peace, conflict and power in the field: Methodological challenges and opportunities (pp. 63–83). Peace Psychology Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Hartman, A., Blair, R., & Blattman, C. (2018). Engineering informal institutions: Long-run impacts of alternative dispute resolution on violence and property rights in Liberia. Working paper. Retrieved from: https://www.nber.org/papers/w24482
Holla, A. (2018). Are we over-investing in baselines? Retrieved from: http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/are-we-over-investing-baselines
Humphreys, M. (2014, November 2). How to make field experiments more ethical. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2014/11/02/how-to-make-field-experiments-more-ethical/?utm_term=.b95e728af290
Inks, L. & Wolfe, R. (2016). Motivations and empty promises: Voices of former Boko Haram combatants and Nigerian youth. Washington, DC: Mercy Corps.
Karlan, D. & Appel, J. (2012). More than good intentions: Improving the way the world’s poor borrow, save, farm, learn and stay health. New York, NY: Random House.
Kurtz, J., Tesfaye, B., & Wolfe, R.J. (2018). Can economic interventions reduce violence: Impacts of vocational training and cash transfers on youth support for political violence in Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Mercy Corps.
Levine, R. (2017). The moral case for evidence in policymaking. Retrieved from: https://hewlett.org/moral-case-evidence-policymaking/
Lierl, M. & Holmlund, M. (2019). Performance-based voting in local elections: Experimental evidence from Burkina Faso. In Dunning, T., Grossman, G., Humphreys, M., Hyde, S., McIntosh, C., & Nellis, G. Information, accountability, and cumulative learning: Lessons from Metaketa I (pp. 221–256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lyall, J., Zhou, Y., & Imai, K. (2019). Can economic assistance shape combatant support in Wartime? Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Political Science Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000698
Mercy Corps (2015). Beyond Meeting Immediate Needs: The Impact of Electronic Cash Transfer Approaches on Disaster Recovery and Financial Inclusion. https://www.mercycorps.org/sites/default/files/TabangKO%20Impact%20Evaluation%20Report_Final.pdf
Moss, S. M., Uluğ, Ö. M., & Acar, Y. G. (2019). Doing research in conflict contexts: Practical and ethical challenges for researchers when conducting fieldwork. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000334
Mousa, S. (2019). Building tolerance: Intergroup contact and soccer in post-ISIS Iraq. Working Paper.
Muralidharan, M., Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2016). Building state capacity: Evidence from biometric smartcards in India. American Economic Review, 106(10), 2895–2929. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141346
OCHA (2018, January 28). North-east Nigeria: Humanitarian Situation Update, December 2107. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/nigeria/north-east-nigeria-humanitarian-situation-update-december-2017
Offer-Westort, M., Coppock, A., & Green, D. (2018). Adaptive experimental design: Prospects and applications in political science. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 30th - September 2, 2018. Retrieved from: https://alexandercoppock.com/papers/OCG_adaptive.pdf
Paler, L., Marshall, L. & Atallah, S. (2018). Discussing Politics in Ethnically Divided Societies: An Experiment in Lebanon. Working paper.
Paolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388667.
Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
Paluck, E. L. (2010). Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact, and perspective-taking in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1170–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210379868
Paluck, E. L. & Green, D. P. (2009). Deference, dissent, and dispute resolution: A field experiment on a mass media intervention in Rwanda. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990128
Paluck, E., Green. S., & Green, D. P. (2018). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2) 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Metaanalytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
Scacco, A. & Warren, S. (2018). Can social contact reduce prejudice and discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000151
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349–356.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel. The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Urdal, H. (2004). The devil in the demographics: The effect of youth bulges on domestic armed conflict, 1950-2000. Social Development Papers - Conflict Prevention & Reconstruction, Paper No. 14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolfe, R. (2020). The Benefits and Challenges of Randomized Control Trials in Conflict Environments: Reflections From a Scholar-Practitioner. In: Acar, Y.G., Moss, S.M., Uluğ, Ö.M. (eds) Researching Peace, Conflict, and Power in the Field. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44113-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44113-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44112-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44113-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)