Abstract
This chapter introduces the reader to the methods and findings of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded proof-of-concept (PoC) research study of the first 5 years of teaching primary and secondary school mathematics (FIRSTMATH) using a comparative and international approach. Throughout the book, we discuss the challenges entailed in the development of concepts, methods, and strategies for scaling such a study. The research reported in this book builds from the methods and findings of the Teacher Education Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), and earlier studies that have explored the experiences of beginning teachers. The key question for FIRSTMATH was: How do primary and secondary novice mathematics teachers differ nationally and cross-nationally in their demographic characteristics, preparation, knowledge for teaching, teaching assignments, working conditions, teaching practice, and pupil learning? The FIRSTMATH team developed knowledge tests and background questionnaires for beginning teachers and their pupils, as well as interviews and a mathematics-focused observation protocol to gather more direct evidence of instructional knowledge and practices, and explored an alternative to value added models (VAMs) to model teacher-pupil interactions as teachers pursue instructional goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
More countries across all regions of the world initially responded to our call to engage in this study. Issues with access and capacity made data collection difficult for some.
References
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2005). Teacher attrition: A costly loss to the nation and to the states. http://www.all4ed.org/files/archive/publications/TeacherAttrition.pdf
American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2015). AERA statement on use of value-added models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 44, 448–452.
Baumert, J. R., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Berliner, D. (2001). Learning about learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (Eds.). (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cady, J., Meier, S. L., & Lubinski, C. A. (2006). Developing mathematics teachers: The transition from preservice to experienced teacher. Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 295–305.
Carnoy, M., Brodziak, I., Luschei, T., Beteille, T., & Loyalka, P. (2009). Do countries paying teachers higher relative salaries have higher student mathematics achievement? Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and practice. In S. Furman, D. Cohen, & F. Mosher (Eds.), The state of education policy research (pp. 63–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Edwards, A. (2016). The dialectic of person and practice: How cultural-historical accounts of agency can inform teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 269–285). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Fellers, P. S. (2014). Value-added methodology for estimating professional development program effects. Doctoral dissertation. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3642746
Fletcher, S. H., & Strong, M. (2009). Full-release and site-based mentoring of elementary grade new teachers: An analysis of changes in student achievement. New Educator, 5, 329–341.
Fletcher, S. H., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110, 2271–2289.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Glazerman, S., Senesky, S., Seftor, N., & Johnson, A. (2006). Design of an impact evaluation of teacher induction programs (Final Report No. 6137-070). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/designimpact.pdf
Glazerman, S., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Isenberg, E., Lugo-Gil, J., Grider, M., Britton, E., & Ali, M. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first year of a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009-4034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Glazerman, S., Isenberg, E., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Grider, M., & Jacobus, M. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Good, T. L., Grows, D. A., & Ebmeier, M. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York, NY: Longman.
Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2008). No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by America’s education schools. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality. http://www.nctq.org
Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 513–545.
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511.
Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287–297.
Huberman, M. (1985). What knowledge is of most worth to teachers? A knowledge-use perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(3), 251–262.
Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & May, H. (2014). What are the effects of teacher education and preparation on beginning teacher attrition? (#RR-82). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
Isenberg, E., Glazerman, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Lugo-Gil, J., Grider, M., & Dolfin, S. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the second year of a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009–4072). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E. & Donaldson, M. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers’ early experiences in high income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n61/
Kane, T. (2007). New teachers outdo peers of last decade on academic scales. Education Week, 12/19/07. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/12/19/16ets.h27.html
Kardos, S. M., Johnson, S. M., Peske, H. G., Kauffman, D., & Liu, E. (2001). Counting on colleagues: New teachers encounter the professional cultures of their schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 250–290.
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J. R., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Alexander, J. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 716–725.
LeCompte, M. D. (2009). Trends in research on teaching: an historical and critical overview. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Boston, MA: Springer.
Martineau, J. A. (2004). The effects of construct shift on growth and accountability models. Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State University.
Munby, H. H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it developed. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 87–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
National Academy of Sciences. (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology, new practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9832/educating-teachers-of-science-mathematics-and-technology-new-practices-for
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2005). Induction to learning communities. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. http://www.nctaf.org/documents/NCTAF_Induction_Paper_2005.pdf
OECD. (2010). Educating teachers for diversity: Meeting the challenge. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/educatingteachersfordiversitymeetingthechallenge.htm
OECD. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the World. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/buildingahigh-qualityteachingprofessionlessonsfromaroundtheworld.htm
Rockoff, J. E. (2008). Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City (Working Paper 13868). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13868
Stanulis, R. N., Little, S., & Wibbens, E. (2012). Intensive mentoring that contributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to lead classroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 32–43.
Tatto, M. T. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 155–180.
Tatto, M. T. (1998). The influence of teacher education on teachers’ beliefs about purposes of education, roles and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 66–77.
Tatto, M. T. (1999). The socializing influence of normative cohesive teacher education on teachers’ beliefs about instructional choice. Teachers and Teaching, 5, 111–134.
Tatto, M. T. (2007). Reforming teaching globally. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books. (Reprinted in 2009 Information Age Publishers).
Tatto, M. T. (Ed.). (2013). The Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: Technical report. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.
Tatto, M. T. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201.
Tatto, M. T. (2017). The role of comparative and international research in developing capacity to study and improve teacher education. In M. A. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Tatto, M. T., & Bankov, K. (2018). The intended, implemented, and achieved curriculum of mathematics teacher education in the United States. In M. T. Tatto, M. C. Rodriguez, W. M. Smith, M. D. Reckase, & K. Bankov (Eds.), Exploring the mathematics education of teachers using TEDS-M data. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Tatto, M. T., Burn, K., Menter, I., Mutton, T., & Thompson, I. (2018). Learning to teach in England and the United States: The evolution of policy and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Tatto, M. T., & Hordern, J. (2017). The configuration of teacher education as a professional field of practice: A comparative study of mathematics education. In J. Furlong & G. Whitty (Eds.), Knowledge and the study of education: An international exploration (pp. 255–274). Oxford, UK: Oxford Comparative Education Series, Symposium Books.
Tatto, M. T., Rodriguez, M. C., Smith, W. M., Reckase, M. D., & Bankov, K. (Eds.). (2018). Exploring the mathematics education of teachers using TEDS-M data. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., … Reckase, M. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.
Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers' teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.
Wang, J., & Paine, L. W. (2001). Mentoring as assisted performance: A pair of Chinese teachers working together. Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 157–181.
Wong, K. H., Britton, T., & Ganser, T. (2005). What the world can teach us about new teacher induction. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 379–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tatto, M.T., Rodriguez, M.C., Reckase, M.D., Smith, W.M., Bankov, K., Pippin, J. (2020). The FIRSTMATH Study: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies for Comparative International Research in Mathematics Education. In: The First Five Years of Teaching Mathematics (FIRSTMATH). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44047-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44047-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44046-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44047-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)