Skip to main content

Providing Models of DSL Evolution Using Model-to-Model Transformations and Invariants Mechanisms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and New Challenges

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 40))

  • 1052 Accesses

Abstract

The research is related to the problem of coherent evolution of a domain-specific language (DSL) in response to evolution of the application domain and users’ capabilities. We offer a solution of that problem based on a particular model-driven approach. We give the whole definition of DSL in terms of model-oriented approach. Such definition allows us to define the DSL development using the mechanism of consecutive, consistent transformations between DSM, DSL metamodel and DSL concrete syntax model. In our approach we call such transformations as projections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martin, F. (2010). Domain specific languages. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mernik, M., Heering, J., & Sloane, A. M. (2005). When and how to develop domain specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 37(4), 316–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleenewerck, T., Czarnecki, K., Striegnitz, J., & Volter, M. (2004). Report from the ECOOP 2004 workshop on evolution and reuse of language specifications for DSLs (ERLS). In Object-oriented technology. ECOOP 2004 workshop reader (pp. 187–201). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cleenewerck, T. (2003). Component-based DSL development. In Software language engineering (pp. 245–264). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez-Abajo, P., Guerra, E., & De Lara, E. (2016). A domain-specific language for model mutation and its application to the automated generation of exercises. Computer Languages, Systems and Structures, 49, 152–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Popovic, A., Lukovic, I., Dimitrieski, V., & Djuki, V. (2015). A DSL for modeling application-specific functionalities of business applications. Computer Languages, Systems and Structures, 43, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Challenger, M., Demirkol, S., Getir, S., Mernik, M., Kardas, G., & Kosar, T. (2014). On the use of a domain-specific modeling language in the development of multiagent systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 28, 111–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laird, P., & Barrett, S. (2010). Towards dynamic evolution of domain specific languages. Software Language Engineering, LNCS 5969, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira, M., Fonseca, J., & Henriques, P. (2016). Ontological approach for DSL development. Computer Languages, Systems and Structures, 45, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, P. (2007). Automated transformation of statements within evolving domain specific languages. Computer science and information system reports. In T. Cleenewerck (Ed.), Component-based DSL development (pp. 172–177).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mengerink, J. G. M., Serebrenik, A., Schiffelers, R. R. H., & van den Brand, M. G. J. (2016). A complete operator library for DSL evolution specification. In MDSE 32nd International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution Proceedings (pp. 144–154).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mengerink, J. G. M., Serebrenik, A., van den Brand, M. G. J., & Schiffelers, R. R. H. (2016). Udapt edapt extensions for industrial application. In ITSLE 2016 Industry Track for Software Language Engineering Proceedings (pp. 21–22).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sprinkle, J. (2004). A domain-specific visual language for domain model evolution. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 15, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosar, T., Bohra, B., & Mernik, M. (2016). Domain-specific languages: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 71, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Terence, P. (2012). Language implementation patterns: Create your own domain-specific and general programming languages. Pragmatic Bookshelf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guizzardi, G. (2005). Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models (Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series: Vol 15). Enschede: Centre for Telematics and Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guizzardi, G. (2013). Ontology-based evaluation and design of visual conceptual modeling languages. In Domain engineering (pp. 317–347). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Agrawal, A., Karsai, G., & Shi, F. (2003). Graph transformations on domain-specific models. International Journal on Software and Systems Modeling, 37, 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruffolo, M., Sidhu, I., & Guadagno, L. (2007). Semantic enterprise technologies. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Industrial Results of Semantic Technologies: Vol. 293 (pp. 70–84).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elipse Graphical Modeling Project (GMP). Accessed December 26, 2019, form http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmp/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Ulitin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ulitin, B., Babkin, E. (2020). Providing Models of DSL Evolution Using Model-to-Model Transformations and Invariants Mechanisms. In: Zaramenskikh, E., Fedorova, A. (eds) Digital Transformation and New Challenges. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43993-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics