Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder caused by damage to the myelin that protects nerve fibres, resulting in demyelinated lesions and causing various symptoms, one of which is muscle weakness. Physical rehabilitation is an integral part of managing MS, as well as its symptoms, and over time, the forms of implementing rehabilitation have changed according to novel technologies. Virtual reality (VR) has already been successfully applied to many fields of life sciences. VR can recreate engaging virtual environments for the specific purpose of physical rehabilitation that one can experience from the home environment. As a proof of concept, three games were developed for multiple sclerosis (MS) through the ground-breaking game engine Unity: a Piano game, a Recycle game and a Tidy Up game. The Piano game had three levels, starting from learning simple keys and ending with small well-known songs, in order to gradually challenge the user as they progress through their rehabilitation. The Recycle game focused on entertainment; it was playful providing a simpler but engaging and fun experience that used items that are seen in everyday life. In addition, a scoring system was implemented in order to motivate the user. Finally, the Tidy Up game had three different levels giving the user goals to work towards; at each level, the time available to complete the game became shorter giving the user less time to tidy up the table. These games were presented to individuals with MS, who had never used VR. Feedback was collected in order to assess the usability and the perceived sense of presence generated by the proposed approach. The testing also aimed to better understand rehabilitation techniques including factors affecting motivation. The games for rehabilitation were warmly received, and feedback was positive regarding both the usability of the system and the perceived sense of presence within digital environments. Although the tested sample size limits were small, a limitation of the validity of the results, these initial findings suggest VR must be beneficial in MS physical rehabilitation of the upper limb although larger, more formal evaluation is required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachmann D, Weichert F, Rinkenauer G (2018) Review of three-dimensional human-computer interaction with focus on the leap motion controller. Sensors (Basel) 18(7):2194
Bamm EL et al (2015) Exploring client-centered care experiences in in-patient rehabilitation settings. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact 24(6):574–594
Bayer (2018) Multiple sclerosis. The 4 types of MS. [Online]. https://www.multiplesclerosis.com/us/treatment.php. Accessed 12 June 2019
Biocca F, Levy MR (1995) Communication in the age of virtual reality. Routledge, London
Bitsch A, Bruck W (2002) Differentiation of multiple sclerosis subtypes. CNS Drugs 16(6):405–418
Borghese NA et al (2013) Computational intelligence and game design for effective AtHome stroke rehabilitation. Games Health J 2(2):81–88
Borrego A, Latorre J, Alcaniz M, Llorens R (2018) Comparison of oculus rift and HTC vive: feasibility for virtual reality-based exploration, navigation, exergaming, and rehabilitation. Games Health J 7(3):151–156
Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40:36–43
Brandt EN, Pope AM (1997) Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. National Academies Press, Washington DC
Brennan DM, Brownsell S, Mawson S (2009) Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation and self management. In: Gaggioli A, Keshner EA, Weiss PL, Riva G (eds) Advanced technologies in rehabilitation : enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management, Studies in health technology and informatics. IOS Press, Fairfax, pp 231–248
Brooke J (1996) SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 189–194
Burks JS, Bigley GK, Hill HH (2009) Rehabilitation challenges in multiple sclerosis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 12(4):296–306
Cameirao MS, Badia SB, Verschure PF (2008) Virtual reality based upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a review. J CyberTher Rehabil 1(1):63–73
Carrozzino M, Bergamasco M (2010) Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J Cult Herit 11(4):452–458
Casuso-Holgado M, Martin-Valero R, Carazo A, Medrano-Sanchez E, Cortes-Vega M, Montero-Bancalero F (2018) Effectiveness of virtual reality training for balance and gait rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Rehabil 32(9):1220–1234
Charles D, McDonough S (2014) A participatory design framework for the gamification of rehabilitation systems. University of Ulster, Sweden
Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, Robert G (2017) What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing coproduced interventions in acute. BMJ Open 7:e014650
Colombo R et al (2007) Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:3
Cooper M, Keating D (1999) Implications of the emerging home systems technologies for rehabilitation. Med Eng Phys 18(3):176–180
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(1):1–11
Faber J, Fronseca L (2014) How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press J Orthod 19(4):27–29
Fernández-González P, Carratalá-Tejada M, Monge-Pereira E, Collado-Vázquez S, Sánchez-Herrera Baeza P, Cuesta-Gómez A, Oña-Simbaña E, Jardón-Huete A, Molina-Rueda F, Balaguer-Bernaldo de Quirós C, Miangolarra-Page J, Cano-de la Cuerda R (2019) Leap motion controlled video game-based therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 16(1):1–10
Freina L, Ott M (2015) A Literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE), Bucharest, Romania
Freitas BLD et al (2019) Analysis of different device interactions in a virtual reality task in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy – a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol 10:24
Germert-Pijnen JEV et al (2011) A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res 13(4):e111
Ghafari S, Tabrizi KN, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Mohammadi E (2015) Patients’ experiences of adapting to multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. Contemporary nurse: a journal for the Australian nursing profession 50(1):36–49
Grealy M, Nasser B (2013) The use of virtual reality in assisting rehabilitation. ACNR 13(6):19–20
Hui SLT, See SL (2015) Enhancing user experience through customisation of UI design. Procedia Manuf 3:1932–1937
Jack D et al (2001) Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9(3):308–318
Jennett C et al (2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(9):641–661
Kalron A et al (2016) The effect of balance training on postural control in people with multiple sclerosis using the CAREN virtual reality system: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil 13:13
Kaptelinin V (2016) Chapter 44: affordances. In: Soegaard M, Dam R (eds) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus
Karashanov A, Manolova A, Nikolay N (2016) Application for hand rehabilitation using leap motion sensor based on gamification approach. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng 5(2):61–69
Karpatkin H (2005) Multiple sclerosis and exercise a review of the evidence. Int J MS Care 7:36–41
Kemp B (1988) Motivation, rehabilitation and aging: a conceptual model. Top Geriatr Rehabil 3(3):41–51
Kern F, Winter C, Gall D, Pauli P (2019) Immersive virtual reality and gamification within procedurally generated environments to increase motivation during gait rehabilitation. Osaka, Japan, IEEE
Khan F et al (2007) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database System Rev 2
Kobayashi S (1987) A book of colors: matching colors, combining colors, color designing, color decorating. Kodansha International, Tokyo
Kujala S et al (2011) UX curve: a method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interact Comput 23(5):473–483
Lai E (2011) Motivation: a literature review. Research report. Pearson
Lang B (2018) Oculus claims breakthrough in hand-tracking accuracy. [Online]. https://www.roadtovr.com/oculus-claims-breakthrough-in-hand-trackingaccuracy/. Accessed 07 Aug 2019
Lanyi CS (2006) Virtual reality in healthcare. In: Ichalkaranje N, Ichalkaranje A (eds) Intelligent paradigms for assistive and preventive healthcare. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–116
LaRocca N, Kalb R (1992) Efficacy of rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. J Neuro Rehabil 6(3):147–155
Lassman H (2010) Axonal and neuronal pathology in multiple sclerosis: what have we learnt from animal models. Exp Neurol 225(1):2–8
Laurel B (2016) ResearchGate: what is virtual reality? [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301891235_What_Is_Virtual_Reality. Accessed 20 June 2019
Laver K, George S, Ratcliffe J, Crotty M (2011) Virtual reality stroke rehabilitation – hype or hope? Aust Occup Ther J 58(3):215–219
Laver K et al (2012) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 43(2):e20–e21
Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch J (2015) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: an abridged version of a Cochrane review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51(4):497–506
Laver KE et al (2017) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11
LaViola J et al (2004) 3D user interfaces: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Boston
LeapMotion (2019) How does the leap motion controller work? [Online]. http://blog.leapmotion.com/hardware-to-software-how-does-the-leap-motioncontroller-work/. Accessed 12 June 2019
Levin MF, Weiss PL, Keshner EA (2015) Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles. Phys Ther 95(3):415–425
Lewis J (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):5778
Lewis JR (2018) The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int J Hum Comput Interact 34(7):577–590
Limbasiya H (2018) Sense simulation in virtual reality to increase. University of Dublin, Dublin
Liu Z, Zhang Y, Rau P-LP, Choe P (2015) Leap-motion based online interactive system for hand rehabilitation. ResearchGate, Los Angeles
Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A (2002) 179 citations. Stroke 33(2):444–448
Maggio MG et al (2019) Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: a review on cognitive and motor outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 65:106–111
Martin E (2016) Why 5 is the magic number for UX usability testing. [Online]. https://www.invisionapp.com/inside-design/ux-usability-research-testing/. Accessed 07 Aug 2019
Massetti T et al (2016) Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis – a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 8:107–102
Minor J (2019) Finally, Smell a movie with FeelReal virtual reality. [Online]. https://www.geek.com/tech/feelreal-adds-smellovision-to-your-virtual-reality-experience-1617483/. Accessed 16 Nov 2019
Mutchnick MG (1988) The role of motivation in rehabilitation. In: Long CJ, Williams JM (eds) Cognitive approaches to neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 169–187
Mütterlein J (2018) The three pillars of virtual reality? Investigating the roles of immersion, presence, and interactivity, Hawaii, s.n., pp 1407–1415
NMSS (2020) Types Of MS. [Online]. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Available at: https://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS/Types-of-MS. [Accessed 9 March 2019]
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
O’Neil O et al (2018) Virtual reality for neurorehabilitation: insights from 3 European clinics. PM R 10(9):S198–S206
Octavia JR, Coninx K (2014) Adaptive personalized training games for individual and collaborative rehabilitation of people with multiple sclerosis. BioMed Res Int 22
Paul L (2017) How could new technology change MS rehab therapy? [Online]. https://www.mstrust.org.uk/news/views-and-comments/how-could-new-technology-change-ms-rehab-therapy. Accessed 10 June 2019
Ponte S, Gabrielli S, Jonsdottir J, Morando M, Dellepiane S (2015) Monitoring game-based motor rehabilitation of patients at home for better plans of care and quality of life. 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Pourmand A et al (2017) Emerging utility of virtual reality as a multidisciplinary tool in clinical medicine. Games Health J 6(5):263–270
Powell W, Rizzo A, Sharkey P, Merrick J (2018) Innovations and challenges in the use of virtual reality technologies for rehabilitation. J Altern Med Res 10(1)
Proctor E et al (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 38(2):65–76
Quilis J-AL et al (2014) Virtual rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis using a Kinect-based system: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games 2(2):e12
Resnick B (1998) Functional performance of older adults in a Long-term care setting. Clin Nurs Res 7(3):230
Rieckmann P et al (2015) Achieving patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: a perspective from the multiple sclerosis in the 21st century steering group. Mult Scler Relat Disord 4(3):202–218
Rietberg M, Brooks D, Uitdehaag B, Kwakkel G (2015) Exercise therapy for multiple sclerosis (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Rizvi SA, Agius MA (2004) Current approved options for treating patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 63:S8–S14
Rohrig M (2018) Physical therapy in multiple sclerosis. [Online]. https://www.nationalmssociety.org/NationalMSSociety/media/MSNationalFiles/Brochures/Clinical_Bulletin_Physical-Therapy-in-MS-Rehabilitation.pdf. Accessed 08 June 19
Satava R, Jones SB (1999) Medical applications of virtual reality. Yale University, New Haven
Sauro J (2010) MeasuringU. [Online]. https://measuringu.com/five-users/#many. Accessed 07 Aug 2019
Sauro J, Lewis J (2012) Quantifying the user experience. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA
Schuemie MJ, Straaten PVD, Krijin M, Mast CAVD (2004) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychol Behav 4(2)
Sharkey P, Rizzo AA (eds) (2016) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on disability, virtual reality and associated technologies (ICDVRAT 2016). ICDVRAT. University of Reading, Reading, UK, p pp453. isbn:9780704915473. Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/66645/
Sharp T, Wei Y, Freedman D, Kohli P, Krupka E, Fitzgibbon A, Izadi S, Keskin C, Robertson D, Taylor J, Shotton J, Kim D, Rhemann C, Leichter I, Vinnikov A (2015) Accurate, robust, and flexible real-time hand tracking. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI’15
Shin D (2018) Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: to what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Comput Hum Behav 78:64–73
Shin JH, Ryu H, Jang SH (2014) A task-specific interactive game-based virtual reality rehabilitation system for patients with stroke: a usability test and two clinical experiments. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11:32
Slater M (1999) Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence Teleop Virt 8(5):560–565
Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3
Soegaard M, Dam R (2013) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus
Soegaard M, Dam R (2016) The encyclopedia of human computer interaction, 2nd edn. English: Published by The Interaction Design Foundation
Spain R (2018) Determination of multiple sclerosis subtypes. [Online]. https://www.va.gov/MS/Professionals/diagnosis/Determination_of_MS_Subtypes.asp. Accessed 08 June 2019
Squire L et al (2008) Fundamental Neuroscience, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Sutliff M et al (2016) Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: commentary on the recent AAN systematic review. Neurol Clin Pract 6(6):475–479
Tamborini R, Skalski P (2005) The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. New York, pp 225–241
Thompson AJ et al (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 391(10130):1622–1636
Tieri G, Morone G, Paolucci S, Iosa M (2018) Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies. Expert Rev Med Devices 15(2):107–117
Trombetta M et al (2017) Motion rehab AVE 3D: a VR-based exergame for post-stroke rehabilitation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 151:15–20
Tsekleves E et al (2009) The use of the Nintendo Wii in motor rehabilitation for virtual reality interventions: a literature review. In: Minhua M, Lakhmi JC, Anderson P (eds) Virtual, augmented reality and serious games for healthcare. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–344
Voinea A, Modoveanu A, Moldoveanu F, Ferche O (2015a) Motion detection and rendering for upper limb post-stroke rehabilitation: multimedia applications for medical and healthcare education and learning; rehabilitative and assistive technologies. Isai, Romania, IEEE
Voinea A, Moldoveanu A, Moldoveanu F (2015b) 3D visualization in IT systems used for post stroke recovery: rehabilitation based on virtual reality. Bucharest, IEEE
Wang Z et al (2017) Leap motion-based virtual reality training for improving motor functional recovery of upper limbs and neural reorganization in subacute stroke patients. Neural Regen Res 12(11):1823–1831
Webster A (2017) The co-creation design of hand rehabilitation games for multiple sclerosis using leap motion hand tracking system. Glasgow School od Art & University of Glasgow, Glasgow
Webster A, Poyade M, Paul L, Rea P (2018) The co-design of hand rehabilitation exercises for multiple sclerosis using leap motion hand tracking system. University of Glasgow, Glasgow
Webster A, Poyade M, Paul L, Rea P (2019) The co-design of hand rehabilitation exercises for multiple sclerosis using hand tracking system. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation, vol 1. Springer, Cham
Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240
Won A, Bailey J, Bailenson J, Tataru C, Yoon I, Golianu B (2017) Immersive virtual reality for pediatric pain. Children (Basel) 4(7):52
Yates M, Kelemen A, Lanyi CS (2016) Virtual reality gaming in the rehabilitation of the upper extremities post-stroke. Brain Inj 30(7):855–863
Zhang T, Wang Z, Wang P, Xing L, Mei L, Zhao J (2017) Leap motion-based virtual reality training for improving motor functional recovery of upper limbs and neural reorganization in subacute stroke patients. Neural Regen Res 12(11):1823
Zirbel C, Zhang X, Hughes C (2018) The VRehab system: a low-cost mobile virtual reality system for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation for medically underserved populations. USA, IEEE
Zyda M (2005) From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38:25–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soomal, H.K., Poyade, M., Rea, P.M., Paul, L. (2020). Enabling More Accessible MS Rehabilitation Training Using Virtual Reality. In: Rea, P. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43960-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43961-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)