Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cinedefecography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anorectal Physiology

  • 786 Accesses

Abstract

Cinedefecography plays an important role in the investigation and treatment of obstructed defecation. This dynamic exam is safe, technically simple, inexpensive, and more widely available when compared to other dynamic modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Koughnett JAMV, Silva G. Anorectal physiology and testing. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013;42:713–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, et al. Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics. 2002;22:817–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andomanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Filippou D. Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:638–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choung R, Locke G III, Schleck C, Zinsmeister A, Talley N. Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: a population-based study 1988–2003. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1521–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McNevin MS. Overview of pelvic floor disorders. Surg Clin N Am. 2010;90:195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reginelli A, Grezia GD, Gatta G, Iacobellis F, Rossi C, Giganti M, Coppolino F, Brunese L. Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic floor hernias. BMC Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reginelli A, Pezzullo MG, Scaglione M, Scialpi M, Brunese L, Grassi R. Gastrointestinal disorders in elderly patients. Radiol Clin N Am. 2008;46:755–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walldén L. Defecation block in cases of deep rectogenital pouch. Acta Chir Scand. 1952;165:1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:247–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobrado CW, Pires CEF, Amaro E, Cerri GG, Habr-Gama A, Kiss DR. Videodefecografia: aspectos técnicos atuais. Radiol Bras. 2004;37(4):283–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar S, Sharma P, Andreisek G. Does conventional defecography has a role to play in evaluation of evacuatory disorders in Indian population? Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23(1):92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganeshan A, Anderson EM, Upponi S, et al. Imaging of obstructed defecation. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:18–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Faccioli N, Comai A, Mainardi P, Perandini S, Moore F, Pozzi R. Defecography: a practical approach. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010;16:209–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seong MK, Kim TW. Significance of defecographic parameters in diagnosing pelvic floor dyssynergia. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84:225–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV, Escalante RD, Silva FRS, Lima DMR, et al. Ecodefecografia Tridimensional Dinâmica. Nova Técnica para Avaliação da Síndrome da Defecação Obstruída (SDO). Rev bras Coloproct. 2006;26(2):168–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenton K, Mueller ER. The global burden of female pelvic floor disorders. BJU Int. 2006;98(Suppl 1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palit S, Bhan C, Lunniss PJ, Boyle DJ, Gladman MA, Knowles CH, Scott SM. Evacuation proctography: a reappraisal of normal variability. Color Dis. 2014;16:538–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobrado CW. Contribuição da videodefecografia dinâmica computadorizada no estudo de doentes submetidos a graciloplastia. Tese (Doutorado). Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jorge JMN, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography. Am J Surg. 2001;182:93–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobrado CW, Nadal SR, Sousa AFS Jr. Manual de Fisiologia Anorretal e Assoalho Pélvico. Office Editora. 2012;1:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sobrado CW, Pires CEF, Araújo SEA, Amaro E, Habr-Gama A, Kiss DR. Computerized videodefecography versus defecography: do we need radiographs? Sao Paulo Med J. 2005;123(3):105–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sobrado Júnior CW, Pires CEF, Araújo SEA, Lopes RMG, Habr-Gama A, Kiss DR. Dose de radiação na defecografia e na videodefecografia computadorizada. Rev bras Coloproct. 2003;23(1):20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hompes R, Harmston C, Wijffels N, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Excellent response rate of anismus to botulinum toxin if rectal prolapse misdiagnosed as anismus (‘pseudoanismus’) is excluded. Color Dis. 2012;14:224–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien AS. Defecografia por Resonancia Magnética. Revista Chilena de Radiología. 2010;16(1):11–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Noelting J, Bharucha AE, Lake DS, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, Riederer SJ, et al. Semi-automated vectorial analysis of anorectal motion by magnetic resonance defecography in healthy subjects and fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:e467–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Regadas FS, Hass EM, Abbas MA, Marcio Jorge J, Habr-Gama A, Sands D, et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunction in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(6):686–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, Treiber K, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 2002;223:501–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pilkington SA, Nugent KP, Brenner J, Harris S, Clarke A, Lamparelli M, et al. Barium proctography vs magnetic resonance proctography for pelvic floor disorders: a comparative study. Color Dis. 2012;14:1224–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Foti PV, Farina R, Riva G, Coronella M, Fisichella E, Palmucci S, et al. Pelvic floor imaging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and conventional defecography in studying outlet obstruction syndrome. Radiol Med. 2013;118:23–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M, Jiang T, Peng P, Yang XQ, Wang WC. Association of compartment defects in anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction with female outlet obstruction constipation (OOC) by dynamic MR defecography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19:1407–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pisano U, Irvine L, Szczachor J, Jawad A, MacLeods A, Lima M. Anismus, physiology, radiology: is it time for some pragmatism? A comparative study of radiological and anorectal physiology findings in patients with Anismus. Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):170–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin-Martin GP, Garcia-Armengol J, Roig-Vila JV, Matinez-Sanjua V, Minguez-Perez M, et al. Magnetic resonance defecography versus videodefecography in the study of obstructed defecation syndrome: is videodefecography still the test of choice after 50 years? Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(10):795–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pfeifer J, Oliveira L, Park UC, Gonzalez A, Agachan F, Wexner SD. Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible?. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(2):67–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Carlos Walter Sobrado Jr, Isaac José Felippe Corrêa Neto & Lucas Faraco Sobrado

Authors
  1. Carlos Walter Sobrado Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isaac José Felippe Corrêa Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucas Faraco Sobrado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Walter Sobrado Jr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Director Department of Anorectal Physiology of Rio de Janeiro and CEPEMED, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Lucia Camara Castro Oliveira

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sobrado, C.W., Neto, I.J.F.C., Sobrado, L.F. (2020). Cinedefecography. In: Oliveira, L. (eds) Anorectal Physiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43811-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43811-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43810-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43811-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation