Skip to main content

Influence of Self-disclosure in the Acquaintance Process on Changes in People’s Self-concept, How People Feel About Themselves, and How People Feel About Others

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interpersonal Relationships and the Self-Concept
  • 1768 Accesses

Abstract

Self-disclosure —the process of revealing personal information to others about the self—can be particularly intense at the very beginning stages of relationships. The self-disclosure that occurs in the process of becoming acquainted can lead to changes in the interacting partners’ self-concept , self-esteem, and the degree to which they view their self-concepts to overlap. This chapter synthesizes different areas of research that provide insight into how self-disclosure during the acquaintance process can lead to self-changes . Self-disclosure at the start of relationships can occur both in face-to-face interactions and through the Internet (e.g., online dating profiles). Implications of disclosure for creating self-changes in both types of settings are discussed. Laboratory research conducted by the author with a version of the Fast Friends procedure (e.g., Aron et al., 1997) to examine the consequences of self-disclosure in getting-acquainted pairs is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acevedo, B., Xu, X., Lewandowski, G. W., & Aron, A. (2017). Love and self-expansion. In J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Foundations for couples’ therapy (pp. 245–255). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., Le, B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. In D. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 103–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of the self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp/Harper & Row Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 325–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). The Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., & McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and exchange in continuing and noncontinuing dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 942–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., & Chaikin, A. L. (1977). Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 153–174). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, D. (2016). Meeting expectations: The effects of expectations on self-esteem following the construction of a dating profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K. (2000). Self-disclosure, identity, and relationship development: A dialectical perspective. In K. Dindia & S. Duck (Eds.), Communication and personal relationships (pp. 147–162). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, L. F., Walsh, C., & Slotter, E. B. (2015). Knowing who you are and adding to it: Reduced self-concept clarity predicts reduced self-expansion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingerman, K. L. (2009). Consequential strangers and peripheral ties: The importance of unimportant relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: Critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finkenauer, C., Kerkhof, P., & Pronk, T. (2018). Self-disclosure in relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 271–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J., & Tichenor, D. (2018). Out with the old, in with the new: How changes in close relationships change the self. Journal of Relationships Research, 9, E13. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2018.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, A. J., Fisher Boyd, A. N., & Sprecher, S. (2019). You’re like me and I like you: Mediators of the similarity–liking link assessed before and after a getting-acquainted social interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 2221–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Van Vleet, M. (2019). Inclusion of other in the self scale: An adaptation and exploration in a diverse community sample. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 0265407519848491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N., Reips, U. D., Buchanan, T., & Paine Schofield, C. B. (2010). Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238–1251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Aron, A., Bassis, S., & Kunak, J. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A. (1973). Social reaction and the formation of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, B. L., & Drouin, M. (2016). From social anxiety to interpersonal connectedness: Relationship building within face-to-face, phone and instant messaging mediums. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, K. P., Mattingly, B. A., & Lewandowski, G. W., Jr. (2015). When “we” changes “me”: The two-dimensional model of relational self-change and relationship outcomes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 857–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross- group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 557–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 367–389). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, S. B., Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & De Wall, C. N. (2015). Reaching out by changing what’s within: Social exclusion increases self-concept malleability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2015). The ecology of relationships: Meeting locations and cohabitors’ relationship perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2019). Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date. New Media & Society, 21, 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotter, E. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self-other integration between relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1137–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slotter, E. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2012a). How needing you changes me: The influence of attachment anxiety on self-concept malleability in romantic relationships. Self and Identity, 11, 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotter, E. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2012b). The dangers of dating the “bad boy” (or girl): When does romantic desire encourage us to take on the negative qualities of potential partners? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1173–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 147–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slotter, E. B., & Lucas, G. M. (2013). Validating a measure of self and partner change in romantic relationships: The perceived change in relationships scale. Self and Identity, 12, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 190–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 836–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Treger, S. (2015). The benefits of turn-taking reciprocal self-disclosure in get-acquainted interactions. Personal Relationships, 22, 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Fisher, A., Hilaire, N., & Grzybowski, M. (2015). Association between self-expansion and actual and perceived (dis)similarity and their joint effects on attraction in initial interactions. Self and Identity, 14, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Wondra, J. D. (2012). Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 860–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: A reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, A., Jr. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toma, C. L., & D’Angelo, J. D. (2017). Connecting profile-to-profile: How people self-present and form impressions of others through online dating profiles. In N. M. Penyanunt-Carter & J. S. Wrench (Eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 147–162). Laham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Sprecher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sprecher, S. (2020). Influence of Self-disclosure in the Acquaintance Process on Changes in People’s Self-concept, How People Feel About Themselves, and How People Feel About Others. In: Mattingly, B.A., McIntyre, K.P., Lewandowski, Jr., G.W. (eds) Interpersonal Relationships and the Self-Concept. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43747-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics