Skip to main content

Cultural Activity Diversity and Community Characteristics: An Exploratory Study

  • 2614 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 12051)

Abstract

Cultural diversity has been conceptualized and studied in different ways. On the one hand, cultural diversity can be conceptualized based on people’s ethnic and national backgrounds. On the other hand, cultural dimensions are defined depending on people’s behaviors and traits. Sociologists further categorized the latter depending on the degree of typicality in cultural artifacts/activities and individual’s omnivorousness for cultural tastes. Although both aspects of culture-related concepts provide meaningful implications for urban characteristics, it is still unclear how these cultural dimensions are related to other characteristics of urban areas. This paper suggests a concept of cultural activity diversity, the diversity of cultural activities as a whole in a city. We provide an exploratory analysis of the relationships between cultural characteristics and socio-economic features across 14 and 28 urban areas in the U.S, respectively, using local event datasets.

Keywords

  • Local events
  • Cultural activity diversity
  • Urban characteristics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, the term “community” is used to denote any size of geographical boundaries in a general sense. A local community could range from a neighborhood to metropolitan areas. However, the data analysis in this paper precisely focuses on the Census Urban Area as the geographical unit of analysis.

  2. 2.

    https://meetup.com.

  3. 3.

    https://eventful.com.

  4. 4.

    https://yelp.com.

  5. 5.

    U.S. Census: https://factfinder.census.gov.

  6. 6.

    As of August 2018, the demographic/economic data for 2018 is not available from the U.S. Census. Because the ACS data is created annually and does not change dramatically in a short period of time, 2017 data is reasonable to use for the purpose of this study.

References

  1. Abascal, M., Baldassarri, D.: Love thy neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined. Am. J. Sociol. 121(3), 722–782 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., Hoxby, C.: Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. J. Polit. Econ. 112(2), 348–396 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Alesina, A., Ferrara, E.L.: The determinants of trust. Working Paper 7621, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2000. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7621, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7621

  4. Babacan, H.: Challenges of inclusion: cultural diversity, citizenship and engagement. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Engaging Communities, pp. 1–18. Queensland Department of Main Roads, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bail, C.A.: The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data. Theory Soc. 43(3–4), 465–482 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Bail, C.A., Brown, T.W., Wimmer, A.: Prestige, proximity, and prejudice: how Google search terms diffuse across the world. Am. J. Sociol. 124(5), 1496–1548 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Jan), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Costa, D.L., Kahn, M.E.: Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: an economist’s perspective. Perspect. Polit. 1(1), 103–111 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, S.: Recognition and renown, the structure of cultural markets: evidence from French poetry. J. Cult. Econ. 36(1), 27–48 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabry, J., Goodrich, B.: rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. R package version 2.18.2 (2018). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstanarm

  12. Gereke, J., Schaub, M., Baldassarri, D.: Ethnic diversity, poverty and social trust in Germany: evidence from a behavioral measure of trust. PLoS ONE 13(7), e0199834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199834

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, vol. 349. University of California Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., Soutter, C.L.: Measuring trust. Q. J. Econ. 115(3), 811–846 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldberg, A., Hannan, M.T., Kovács, B.: What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81(2), 215–241 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M.: Finding scientific topics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101(Suppl. 1), 5228–5235 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Hannan, M.T., Carroll, G.R.: Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hirschman, A.O.: The paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 54(5), 761–762 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hristova, D., Aiello, L.M., Quercia, D.: The new urban success: how culture pays. Front. Phys. 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.00027

  22. Lee, M., Butler, B.S.: How are information deserts created? A theory of local information landscapes. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70(2), 101–116 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. López, C., Butler, B., Brusilovsky, P.: Does anything ever happen around here? Assessing the online information landscape for local events. J. Urban Technol. 21(4), 95–123 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazanec, J.A., Crotts, J.C., Gursoy, D., Lu, L.: Homogeneity versus heterogeneity of cultural values: an item-response theoretical approach applying Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in a single nation. Tour. Manag. 48, 299–304 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Van der Meer, T., Tolsma, J.: Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40(1), 459–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell, B., Franco, J.: HOLC “redlining” maps: the persistent structure of segregation and economic inequality. NCRC Research (2018). https://ncrc.org/holc/

  27. Ottaviano, G., Peri, G.: The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities. J. Econ. Geogr. 6(1), 9–44 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Park, M., Park, J., Baek, Y.M., Macy, M.: Cultural values and cross-cultural video consumption on Youtube. PLoS ONE 12(5), e0177865 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Park, M., Weber, I., Naaman, M., Vieweg, S.: Understanding musical diversity via online social media. In: Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pedrini, M., Bramanti, V., Cannatelli, B.: The impact of national culture and social capital on corporate social responsibility attitude among immigrants entrepreneurs. J. Manag. Gov. 20(4), 759–787 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Peterson, R.A., Kern, R.M.: Changing highbrow taste: from snob to omnivore. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61(5), 900–907 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Pettigrew, T.F.: Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49(1), 65–85 (1998)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Pontikes, E.G., Hannan, M.T.: An ecology of social categories. Sociol. Sci. 1, 311–343 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Putnam, R.D.: E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scand. Polit. Stud. 30(2), 137–174 (2007)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Rao, C.R.: Diversity: its measurement, decomposition apportionment and analysis. Sankhy: Indian J. Stat. Ser. A 44(1), 1–22 (1982)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Risen, T.: Where should you start your tech company?: A new study shows that the best city for tech isn’t necessarily Silicon Valley. U.S. News (2016). https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-11/where-should-you-start-your-tech-company. Accessed 3 May 2019

  37. Schaeffer, M.: Can competing diversity indices inform us about why ethnic diversity erodes social cohesion? A test of five diversity indices in Germany. Soc. Sci. Res. 42(3), 755–774 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.018

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(15), 707–719 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Stolle, D., Soroka, S., Johnston, R.: When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Polit. Stud. 56(1), 57–75 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Kuha, J., Jackson, J.: Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethn. Racial Stud. 37(8), 1286–1309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.831932

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Uslaner, E.M.: The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, P., Lee, M., Meng, X., Butler, B.: Toward an ecology theory of creativity in it products: a study of mobile device industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 1–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is part of a larger study in the first author’s dissertation work and has been extended from it. The first author’s research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation’s CHS program (#1816763) and through the Ann G. Wylie Dissertation Fellowship from the University of Maryland at College Park. We appreciate their generous support and reviewers’ constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myeong Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lee, M., Butler, B.S. (2020). Cultural Activity Diversity and Community Characteristics: An Exploratory Study. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)