Skip to main content
Book cover

Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in the Academy pp 49–68Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Reflecting on Representation: Exploring Critical Tensions Within Doctoral Training Programmes in the UK

Abstract

A recent resurgence of decolonisation movements and tensions between the university and wider civic spheres, alongside growing marketisation and internationalisation indicate critical tensions in higher education in the UK. Drawing on the concept of representation, defined as the process through which meaning is produced and exchanged (Hall, Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage, 1997), we focus on the central role of the university in knowledge production. We explore the experiences of doctoral students in the social sciences and humanities in the UK, who we position as new ‘knowledge-makers’. Using narrative inquiry and fictionalised vignettes, we found that doctoral training continues to perpetuate existing Eurocentric and masculinised forms of logic, or ‘regimes of representation’. Participants expressed concern over hegemonic knowledge cultures that often marginalised their epistemic vantage points. However, reflection on representation can be driven and fostered by collective action to create powerful subcultures of critical reflexivity. We argue that these must be incorporated within the design of doctoral training programmes.

Keywords

  • Representation
  • Pedagogy
  • Ethics

All names used are pseudonyms which were agreed with the research participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_3
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-43593-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arday, J., & Mirza, H. S. (Eds.). (2018). Dismantling race in higher education: Racism, whiteness and decolonising the academy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2013). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacevic, J. (2018). University under attack? Politics, contestation and agency beyond the ‘Neoliberal University’. In R. Barnett & M. A. Peters (Eds.), The idea of the university: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Behm Cross, S. (2017). Whiteness in the academy: Using vignettes to move beyond safe silences. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(7), 879–887.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K., Gebriel, D., & Nişancıoğlu, K. (Eds.). (2018). Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine, V., & Steeves, P. (2009). Imagining and playfulness in narrative inquiry. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(25). Retrieved November 2019, from http://www.ijea.org/v10n25/

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), s14–s32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2019). The good university. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, S., Icaza, R., Vázquez, R., & Withaeckx, S. (2017). Editorial: Decolonising the university. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 20(3), 227–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita, G., & Case, P. (2003). Rethinking the internationalisation agenda in UK higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(4), 383–398.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dillabough, J.-A. (2009). To be or not to be (a gendered subject): Was that the question? Gender and Education, 21(4), 455–466.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emejulu, A. (2017, January 12). Another university is possible. Verso. Retrieved November 2019, from http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3044-another-university-is-possible

  • Felman, S. (1985). Writing and madness. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3(May–June), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford Scholarship Online. Retrieved November 2019, from https://www-oxfordscholarship-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001/acprof-9780198237907

  • Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gebrial, D. (2018). Rhodes must fall: Oxford and movements for change. In G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebriel, & K. Nişancıoğlu (Eds.), Decolonising the university (pp. 19–36). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M. (2009). Fostering cross-cultural empathy with non-Western curricular structures. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(2), 271–284.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (n.d.). Where do HE students come from? Retrieved November 2019, from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/where-from

  • Illich, I. (1978). Disabling professions. India International Centre Quarterly, 5(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keet, A. (2014). Epistemic ‘othering’ and the decolonisation of knowledge. Africa Insight, 44(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, G. M., & Schwind, J. K. (2016). Narrative inquiry: Experience matters. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 48(1), 14–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meghji, A. (2019). White power, racialized regimes of truth, and (in)validity. Sentio, 1(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C. (2010). Understanding the international student experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pásztor, A., & Wakeling, P. (2018). All PhDs are equal but … institutional and social stratification in access to the doctorate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(39), 982–997.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Puwar, N. (2004). Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (2015). Characteristics statement: Doctoral degree. UK quality code for higher education – Part A: Setting and maintaining academic standards. Retrieved November 2019, from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/doctoral-degree-characteristics-15.pdf?sfvrsn=50aef981_10

  • Russell Group of Universities (Russell Group). (2017). Profile. Retrieved November 2019, from https://russellgroup.ac.uk/media/5524/rg_text_june2017_updated.pdf

  • Shewarega Hussen, T. (2019, August 29). ‘All that you walk on to get there:’ How to centre feminist ways of knowing. GenderIT.org. Retrieved November 2019, from https://bit.ly/2lJxszb

  • Shillam, R. (2018). Black/academia. In G. K. Bhambra, D. Gebriel, & K. Nişancıoğlu (Eds.), Decolonising the university (pp. 53–63). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockfelt, S. (2011). Slave to the white leaders on paper? The PhD expedition. In S. Trahar (Ed.), The doctorate: International stories of the UK experience (Discussions in education series) (pp. 16–21). Retrieved November 2019, from https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/12986/7/8137_Redacted.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Trahar, S. (2011). Changing landscapes, shifting identities in higher education: Narratives of academics in the UK. Research in Education, 86(1), 46–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating academia: The changing structure of academic time (Palgrave studies in science, knowledge and policy). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, P. (2016). Measuring doctoral student diversity: Socio-economic background. Swindon: Research Councils UK. Retrieved November 2019, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1d3a/e8421c5f9c300a2044e790128cd910264c6a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wambui, J. (2013). An introduction to feminist research. Retrieved November 2019, from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/84523/Wambui_An%20introduction%20to%20feminist%20research.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Williams, P., Bath, S., Arday, J., & Lewis, C. (2019, September). The broken pipeline – barriers to Black PhD students accessing Research Council funding. Leading Routes. Retrieved November 2019, from https://leadingroutes.org/mdocs-posts/the-broken-pipeline-barriers-to-black-students-accessing-research-council-funding

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our tremendous gratitude the participants who generously gave their time and expertise to this project, as well as our ‘critical friends’, mentors and colleagues who provided invaluable suggestions and guidance. We also thank one anonymous reviewer for their insightful and helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK

    Rebecca Gordon & Lakshmi S. Bose

Authors
  1. Rebecca Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lakshmi S. Bose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lakshmi S. Bose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Creative Industries, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia

    Gail Crimmins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gordon, R., Bose, L.S. (2020). Reflecting on Representation: Exploring Critical Tensions Within Doctoral Training Programmes in the UK. In: Crimmins, G. (eds) Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43592-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43593-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)