Abstract
In this chapter, we explore the processes through which the joint reconstruction of the problem takes place in couple therapy. The joint creation of new meanings in the clinical dialogue is considered to be a specific type of joint decision-making in the context of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy relies on conversations that promote the reconstruction of the clients’ problems and fosters a reformulation of their identity toward more inclusive narratives. Within couple and family therapy, contemporary approaches draw on the principles of dialogism and promote a responsive and collaborative therapist stance. However, there is little research on how these practices are carried out in actual sessions. In this chapter, the interactional processes through which the problem is jointly (re)constructed in one couple therapy session and the therapist’s role in this are examined. The analysis underscores the importance of the therapist’s affective responsiveness in facilitating narrative elaboration and emotional expression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26(4), 415–428.
Anderson, H. (2012). Collaborative relationships and dialogical conversations: Ideas for a relationally responsive practice. Family Process, 51(1), 8–24.
Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27(4), 371–393.
Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Avdi, E. (2015). Fostering dialogue: Exploring the therapists’ discursive contributions in a couple therapy. In M. Borcsa & P. Rober (Eds.), Research perspectives in couple therapy: Discursive qualitative methods (pp. 71–88). Heidelberg: Springer.
Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2007). Discourse analysis and psychotherapy: A critical review. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 9(2), 157–176.
Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2019). Researching the discursive construction of subjectivity in psychotherapy. In O. Smoliak & T. Strong (Eds.), Therapy as discourse: Practice and research (pp. 45–70). London: Palgrave.
Avdi, E., & Seikkula, J. (2019). Studying the process of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Discursive and embodied aspects. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 35(2), 217–232.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260.
Buttny, R. (2004). Talking problems: Studies on discursive construction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chartrand, T. L., & van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219–274). Cambridge: Elsevier.
Chovil, N. (1991). Discourse-oriented facial displays in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 163–194.
Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8(1), 44–74.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Eliacin, J., Salyers, M. P., Kukla, M., & Matthias, M. S. (2015). Patients’ understanding of shared decision making in a mental health setting. Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 668–678.
Eubanks, C. F., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2015). Rupture resolution rating system (3RS): Manual. Unpublished manuscript. New York: Mount Sinai-Beth Israel Medical Centre.
Fitzgerald, P., & Leudar, I. (2010). On active listening in person-centred, solution-focused psychotherapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3188–3198.
Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., & Heatherington, L. (2006). Therapeutic alliances in couple and family therapy: An empirically informed guide to practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., Heatherington, L., & Diamond, G. M. (2011). Alliance in couple and family therapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 25–33.
Georgaca, E., & Avdi, E. (2011). Discourse analysis. In D. J. Harper & A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: An introduction for students and practitioners (pp. 147–162). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Guilfoyle, M. (2003). Dialogue and power: A critical analysis of power in family therapy. Family Process, 42(3), 331–343.
Holmes, J. (2009). Exploring in security: Towards an attachment-informed psychoanalytic psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Horvarth, A. O., Del Re, A., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual therapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.
Horvath, A. O., & Bedi, R. P. (2002). The alliance. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knoblοch-Fedders, L., Pinsof, W. M., & Mann, B. J. (2005). The formation of the therapeutic alliance in couple therapy. Family Process, 43(4), 425–442.
Kykyri, V. L., Tourunen, A., Wahlström, J., Kaartinen, J., Penttonen, M., & Seikkula, J. (2017). Soft prosody and embodied attunement in therapeutic interaction: A multimethod case study of a moment of change. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30(3), 211–234.
Lindstrom, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2013). Affiliation in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 350–369). London: Wiley.
Mondada, L. (2011). Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 542–552.
Muntigl, P., & Horvarth, A. (2016). A conversation analytic study of building and repairing the alliance in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 38(1), 102–119.
Norcross, J. C. (2011). Evidence-based therapy relationships: Research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice Training, 48(1), 98–102.
Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Facial expression in an assessment. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schentter, & J. Raab (Eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods (pp. 127–142). Oxford: Peter Lang.
Rober, P. (2005). Family therapy as a dialogue of living persons. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 385–397.
Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. London: Guilford.
Salvatore, S., Tschacher, W., Gelo, O. C. G., & Koch, S. C. (2015). Dynamic systems theory and embodiment in psychotherapy research: A new look at process and outcome. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 914.
Seikkula, J. (2011). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 32(3), 179–193.
Seikkula, J., Karvonen, A., Kykyri, V.-L., Kaartinen, J., & Penttonen, M. (2015). The embodied attunement of therapists and a couple within dialogical psychotherapy: An introduction to the relational mind project. Family Process, 54(4), 703–715.
Seikkula, J., & Olson, M. (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Family Process, 42(3), 403–418.
Seikkula, J., Rober, P., & Laitila, A. (2012). Making sense of multi-actor dialogues in family therapy and network meetings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(4), 667–687.
Slade, M. (2017). Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry, 16(2), 146–153.
Smoliak, O., & Strong, T. (Eds.). (2019). Therapy as discourse: Practice and research. London: Palgrave.
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57.
Sutherland, O., & Strong, T. (2011). Therapeutic collaboration: A conversation analysis of constructionist therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 33(3), 256–278.
Wahlström, J. (2012). Constructing the moral order of a relationship in couples therapy. In M. Borcsa & P. Rober (Eds.), Research perspectives in couple therapy: Discursive qualitative methods (pp. 149–166). Heidelberg: Springer.
Wahlström, J. (2019). Discourse in psychotherapy: Using words to create therapeutic practice. In O. Smoliak & T. Strong (Eds.), Therapy as discourse: Practice and research (pp. 19–44). London: Palgrave.
Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2013). A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 299–321.
Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Prosody and empathic communication in psychotherapy interaction. Psychotherapy Research, 24(6), 687–701.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avdi, E., Lerou, V. (2020). Affective Processes of Joint Meaning-Making in Couple Therapy. In: Lindholm, C., Stevanovic, M., Weiste, E. (eds) Joint Decision Making in Mental Health. The Language of Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43531-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43531-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43530-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43531-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)