Skip to main content

Article 48 [Social Security]

(ex-Article 42 TEC)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – A Commentary

Part of the book series: Springer Commentaries on International and European Law ((SCIEL))

  • 1767 Accesses

Abstract

Social security systems are contributory benefit schemes that are considered to be part of a State’s welfare system. They are insurance-based programmes that require the insured to pay premiums and enable them to claim benefits when the insured risk (e.g. retirement, sickness, involuntary unemployment) materialises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    White (2004), p. 162. The same page of the book provides examples of the ways in which the application of different social security systems to the same situation may lead to obstacles to the free movement of workers. For an explanation of the rationale behind these requirements, see Van der Mei (2003), pp. 3–7.

  2. 2.

    Of course, as White explains, “[r]ecognition of the problems which arise where workers pay contributions in more than one country is not something first identified by the European Community. Co-ordination provisions were a feature of many bilateral trade treaties in order to protect those moving under the treaties”—White (2004), p. 163.

  3. 3.

    Article 51 TEEC provided: “The Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, adopt such measures in the field of social security as are necessary to provide freedom of movement for workers; to this end, it shall make arrangements to secure for migrant workers and their dependants: (a) aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries; (b) payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.”

  4. 4.

    Van der Mei (2003), p. 11.

  5. 5.

    Article 42 TEC provided: “The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, adopt such measures in the field of social security as are necessary to provide freedom of movement for workers; to this end, it shall make arrangements to secure for migrant workers and their dependants: (a) aggregation, for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries; (b) payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States. The Council shall act unanimously throughout the procedure referred to in Article 251.”

  6. 6.

    White (2004), pp. 166–167.

  7. 7.

    For more on welfare policies “as a remaining stronghold of the sovereign nation-state against the influence of EU law and policy” see Martinesen (2013), p. 54. For an explanation of the rationale behind the decision of the Treaty drafters not to include provisions giving competence to the EU to establish a “European welfare state” see Van der Mei (2003), pp. 10–11.

  8. 8.

    Case 24/75, Petroni (ECJ 21 October 1975) para 13.

  9. 9.

    Lipstein (1976), p. 56.

  10. 10.

    Case 41/84, Pinna (ECJ 15 January 1986) para 24–25.

  11. 11.

    White (2004), p. 165 (emphasis added).

  12. 12.

    Council Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community, O.J. L 17/385 (1958).

  13. 13.

    Council Regulation 1408/71/EEC on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, O.J. L 149/2 (1971) and Council Regulation 574/72/EEC fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, O.J. L 74/1 (1972).

  14. 14.

    Parliament/Council Regulation 883/2004/EC on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to members of their families moving within the Community, O.J. L 166/1 (2004) and Parliament/Council Regulation 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, O.J. L 284/1 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Martinsen (2005), p. 89.

  16. 16.

    Article 1 of Parliament/Council Regulation 1231/2010/EU extending Regulation 883/2004 and Regulation 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by those provisions solely on the ground of their nationality, O.J. L 344/1 (2010).

  17. 17.

    For more on the personal scope of the Regulation see Pennings (2005), pp. 244–247.

  18. 18.

    For more on the material scope of the Regulation see Pennings (2005), pp. 247–253.

  19. 19.

    Case C-153/91, Petit (ECJ 22 September 92) para 8–10.

  20. 20.

    Case 60/85, Luitjen (ECJ 10 July 1986) para 12–14.

  21. 21.

    Case 50/75, Massonet (ECJ 25 November 1975) para 15.

  22. 22.

    Case 73/72, Betzinger (ECJ 1 March 1973) para 3.

  23. 23.

    See also Article 11.3 (b), (c), (d), Article 11.4 and Article 15.

  24. 24.

    See also Article 5.

  25. 25.

    White (2004), p. 181.

  26. 26.

    Martinsen (2005), p. 91.

  27. 27.

    For recent books devoted to this area of law see, inter alia, Fuchs and Cornelissen (2015), Pennings and Vonk (2015), Pennings (2015) and Paju (2017).

  28. 28.

    Martinsen (2005), p. 91. See also, Van der Mei (2002), pp. 552–553.

  29. 29.

    Martinsen (2005), p. 92.

  30. 30.

    Case C-215/99, Jauch (ECJ 8 March 2001) para 25.

  31. 31.

    Case C-78/91, Hughes (ECJ 16 July 1992).

  32. 32.

    For more on the distinction between social security and social assistance, see White (2011), pp. 314–316.

  33. 33.

    White (2004), p. 168. See, also, Van der Mei (2002), p. 553. For comments on the distinction between social security and social assistance, see Martinsen (2005), pp. 91–92.

References

  • Fuchs, M., & Cornelissen, R. (Eds.). (2015). EU social security law: A commentary on EU regulations 883/2004 and 987/2009. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipstein, K. (1976). Conflicts of laws in matters of social security under the EEC treaty. In F. G. Jacobs (Ed.), European law and the individual. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinesen, D. S. (2013). Welfare states and social Europe. In U. Neergaard, E. Szyszczak, J. Willem van de Gronden, & M. Krajewski (Eds.), Social services of general interest in the EU. The Hague: TMC Asser Press Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsen, D. S. (2005). Social security regulation in the EU: The de-territorialization of welfare? In G. de Búrca (Ed.), EU law and the welfare state: In search of solidarity. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paju, J. (2017). The European Union and social security law. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, F. (2005). Inclusion and exclusion of persons and benefits in the new co-ordination regulation. In M. Dougan & E. Spaventa (Eds.), Social welfare and EU law: Essay in European law. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, F. (2015). European social security law. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, F., & Vonk, G. (Eds.). (2015). Research handbook on European social security law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mei, A. P. (2002). Regulation 1408/71 and coordination of special non-contributory benefit schemes. Eur Law Rev, 27(5), 551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mei, A. P. (2003). Free movement of persons within the European Community: Cross-border access to public benefits. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. C. A. (2004). Workers, establishment, and services in the European Union. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. C. A. (2011). Social solidarity and social security. In A. Arnull, C. Barnard, M. Dougan, & E. Spaventa (Eds.), A constitutional order of states? Essays in EU law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Tryfonidou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

List of Cases

List of Cases

1.1 ECJ

  • ECJ 01.03.1973, 73/72, Betzinger ECR 283 [cit. in para 10]

  • ECJ 21.10.1975, 24/75, Petroni ECR 1149 [cit. in para 5]

  • ECJ 25.11.1975, 50/75, Massonet ECR 1473 [cit. in para 9]

  • ECJ 15.01.1986, 41/84, Pinna ECR 1 [cit. in para 5]

  • ECJ 10.07.1986, 60/85, Luitjen ECR 2365 [cit. in para 9]

  • ECJ 16.07.1992, C-78/91, Hughes ECR I-4839 [cit. in para 15]

  • ECJ 22.09.1992, C-153/91, Petit ECR I-4973 [cit. in para 8]

  • ECJ 08.03.2001, C-215/99, Jauch ECR I-1901 [cit. in para 14]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tryfonidou, A. (2021). Article 48 [Social Security]. In: Blanke, HJ., Mangiameli, S. (eds) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – A Commentary. Springer Commentaries on International and European Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43511-0_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43511-0_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43509-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43511-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics