Skip to main content

The “True” Cost of Mitigating Commodity Price Volatility: Insights from Total Cost of Ownership and Real Options Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Purchasing

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Many firms have an array of available approaches for reducing financial losses caused by commodity price changes. This chapter provides guidance for more accurately measuring the potential financial effects of commodity price risk mitigation approach selection. Based upon two prominent methodologies, namely total cost of ownership (TCO) and real options approach (ROA), this chapter illustrates how commodity price risk mitigation strategies can be analyzed with respect to their effect on costs and performance. A practical example is provided to illustrate how TCO and ROA can provide useful insight into measuring the costs and benefits related to mitigating the effects of commodity price volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boute, R., Demeulemeester, E., & Herroelen, W. (2004). A real options approach to project management. International Journal of Production Research, 42(9), 1715–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, S., Di Mauro, C., Dominguez, R., Ancarani, A., & Schupp, F. (2018). An exploratory study of risk aversion in supply chain dynamics via human experiment and agent-based simulation. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1497817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonara, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2017). How do supply chain risk management flexibility-driven strategies perform in mitigating supply disruption risks? International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 11(4), 354–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2010). Choosing between single and multiple sourcing based on supplier default risk: A real options approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Development LLC. (2013). The ripple effect: How manufacturing and retail executives view the growing challenge of supply chain risk. http://deloitte.wsj.com/cfo/files/2013/02/the_ripple_effect_supply_chain.pdf.

  • Dixit, A.K., & Pindyck, R.S. (1995). The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. L. (1993). Total cost of ownership: Elements and implementation. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(4), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M., & Siferd, S. P. (1993). Purchasing: The cornerstone of the total cost of ownership concept. Journal of Business Logistics, 14(1), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, B., & Pettit, J. (2011). Creating value at the intersection of sourcing, hedging and trading. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(4), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudenzi, B., Zsidisin, G. A., Hartley, J. L., & Kaufmann, L. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing the choice of commodity price risk mitigation strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.01.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, W., & Kothari, S. P. (2003). How much do firms hedge with derivatives? Journal of Financial Economics, 70, 423–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaLonde, B. J., & Zinszer, P. H. (1976). Customer service: Measuring & measurement. National Council of Physical Distribution Management: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblein, M. J. (2003). The choice of organizational governance form and performance: Predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories. Journal of Management, 29(6), 937–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Ding, Y., Asian, S., & Paul, S. K. (2018). From supply chain integration to operational performance: The moderating effect of market uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majd, S., & Pindyck, R. S. (1987). Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matook, S., Lasch, R., & Tamaschke, R. (2009). Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(3), 241–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 707–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissanke, M. (2010). Issues and challenges for commodity markets in the global economy. In M. Nissanke & G. Movrotas (Eds.), Commodities, governance and economic development under globalization (pp. 39–64). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2018). Supply chain finance: A supply chain-oriented perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25, 118–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Pérez, M., Serrano Bedia, A. M., & López Fernández, M. C. (2016). A review of manufacturing flexibility: Systematising the concept. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3133–3148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1986). Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2001). The dynamics of commodity spot and futures markets: A primer. Energy Journal, 22(3), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochard, S. (2003). Managing risks of supply-chain disruptions: Dual sourcing as a real option (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. (2001). International supply chain agility—Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(5–6), 823–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1998). Real options: Managerial flexibility in strategy and resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. (1994). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California Management Review, 36(2), 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., Gaudenzi, B., Hartley, J. L., & Kaufmann, L. (2015). Understanding commodity price volatility mitigation from transaction cost economics: preliminary results. In Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the 24th Annual IPSERA Conference, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., Hartley, J. L., Kaufmann, L., & Gaudenzi, B. (2013). Managing commodity price volatility and risk. CAPS Research. https://knowledge.capsresearch.org/publications/pdfs-protected/zsidisin2014priceOverview.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Pellegrino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pellegrino, R., Gaudenzi, B., Zsidisin, G.A. (2020). The “True” Cost of Mitigating Commodity Price Volatility: Insights from Total Cost of Ownership and Real Options Approach. In: Schupp, F., Wöhner, H. (eds) The Nature of Purchasing. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics