Abstract
Using a supply chain experiment, this study investigates how individual self-confidence affects inventory management decisions. An empirical model of order quantity determination shows that high-confidence players do not keep current demand into account but prefer to work on a target stock. On the contrary, low-confidence players choose the order quantity by following observed demand closely, resulting in lower supply chain costs but also in lower service levels for the customer. Results have useful managerial implications. First, they imply that the self-confidence of the inventory manager is important in affecting the trade-off between guaranteeing the smooth flow of goods across the supply chain and cost containment. Second, by showing that self-confidence is a good proxy of chain performance, results suggest that its measurement may be useful to inform staffing decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & D’Urso, D. (2013). A human experiment on inventory decisions under supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(1), 61–73.
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & D’Urso, D. (2016). Measuring overconfidence in inventory management decisions. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 22, 171–180.
Bendoly, E., Croson, R., Goncalves, P., & Schultz, K. (2010). Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations. Production & Operations Management, 19(4), 434–452.
Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2013). Managerial miscalibration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1547–1584.
Cachon, G. P., & Zipkin, P. H. (1999). Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management Science, 45(7), 936–953.
Chemers, M. M., Watson, C. B., & May, S. T. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 267–277.
Croson, R., & Donohue, K. (2003). Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: An experimental study. Production and Operations management, 12(1), 1–11.
Croson, R., Donohue, K., Katok, E., & Sterman, J. (2014). Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production and Operations Management, 23(2), 176–196.
Disney, S. M., Maltz, A., Wang, X., & Warburton, R. D. (2016). Inventory management for stochastic lead times with order crossovers. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 473–486.
Flynn, F. J., & Staw, B. M. (2004). Lend me your wallets: the effects of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 309–330.
Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics. A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37–66.
Hada, M., & Grewal, R. (2013). Purchasing managers’ perceived bias in supplier-selected referrals. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 81–95.
Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.
Hribar, P., & Yang, H. (2016). CEO overconfidence and management forecasting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33, 204–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12144.
Kaufmann, L., Michel, A., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Debiasing strategies in supply management decision-making. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 85–106.
Khurana, R. (2002). The curse of the superstar CEO. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 60–66.
Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173.
Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68.
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership (PAL) implications for today’s organizations. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 3–20.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.
Moore, D., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517.
Narayanan, A., & Moritz, B. B. (2015). Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production and Operations Management, 24(8), 1216–1234.
Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887–1934.
Picone, P. M., Dagnino, G. B., & Miná, A. (2014). The origin of failure: A multidisciplinary appraisal of the hubris hypothesis and proposed research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 447–468.
Pirinsky, C. (2013). Confidence and economic attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 139–158.
Ren, Y., & Croson, R. (2013). Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Science, 59(11), 2502–2517.
Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 433.
Simon, M., & Houghton, S. M. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 139–149.
Sniezek, J. A., & Van Swol, L. M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 288–307.
Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1997). Self-confidence and performance on tests of cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 25(2), 93–109.
Sterman, J. (1989). Modelling managerial behaviour: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35(3), 321–339.
Strohhecker, J., & Größler, A. (2013). Do personal traits influence inventory management performance?—The case of intelligence, personality, interest and knowledge. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(1), 37–50.
Wang, J., Zhuang, X., Yang, J., & Sheng, J. (2014). The effects of optimism bias in teams. Applied Economics, 46(32), 3980–3994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., Crocco, G., Schupp, F. (2020). The Importance of Being Confident: Evidence from a Supply Chain Experiment. In: Schupp, F., Wöhner, H. (eds) The Nature of Purchasing. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43501-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43502-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)