Skip to main content

Sensory Evaluation and Acceptance of Goat Yogurts in Comparison with Cow yogurts—An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics (GSMAC 2019)

Abstract

The economic importance of goat production has increased worldwide during the last few decades. Goats have many advantages that enable them to maintain their production under extreme climate and geographic conditions. Goat milk is an excellent food source. It has beneficial effects for health maintenance, physiological functions, in the nutrition of children and elderly people. The chemical characteristics of goat milk can be used to manufacture a wide variety of products including yogurt. Cow milk products are the most commonly consumed milk products in Hungary, at the same time goat dairy products are rarely consumed. The main reasons for refusing goat milk products are their special flavor and taste as well as their premium price and availability. This research aimed to review the economic importance of goat breeding, nutritional and health benefits of goat milk and yogurts; to investigate the perception and acceptance of plain and fruity yogurts made from goat and cow milk. Characteristics of the yogurts were evaluated by the respondents using a rating scale of 1–10. The preferred way of consumption and the affordable price of yogurts were also investigated. This research is part of more complex research including the comparative evaluation and acceptance of cheese, cottage cheese, as well made from cow, sheep and goat milk. A further aim of this current and the entire investigation is to make recommendations on how to increase the consumption of goat milk products in Hungary. SPSS was used for the evaluation, including mean, median, standard deviation, and H2 correlation. The research was carried out in the autumn of 2018 and the beginning of 2019 in Debrecen, Hungary. To test the perception and acceptance of these dairy products blinded test was carried out with the involvement of 202 respondents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albenzo, M., Caroprese, M., Marino, R., Muscio, A., Santillo, A., & Sevi, A. (2006). Characteristics of Garganica goat milk and Cacioricotta cheese. Small Ruminant Research, 64, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anaeto, M., Adeyeye, J. A., Chioma, G. O., Olarinmoye, A. O., & Tayo, G. O. (2010). Goat products: Meeting the challenges of human health and nutrition. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(6), 1231–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldo, B. A. (1984). Milk allergies. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology, 39, 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barna, M. (2009). A kiskérődzők tejének szerepe a gyermekek táplálkozásában. In: S. Kukovics (ed.), A tej szerepe a humán táplálkozásban (pp. 453–464). Budapest: Melánia Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai, R. R. (2012). Importance of goat milk. Journal of Food Science and Technology Nepal, 7, 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billion, P. (2003). Milking management. In H. Roginski, J. W. Fuquay, & P. F. Fox (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Dairy Sciences (pp. 1243–1253). Cornwall: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycheva, S., Dimitrov, T., Naydenova, N., & Mihaylova, G. (2011). Quality characteristics of yogurt from goat’s milk supplemented with fruit juice. Czech Journal Food Science, 29, 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darian, N. K., & Silanikove, N. (2018). The advantages of goats for future adaptation to climate change: A conceptual overview. Small Ruminants Research, 163, 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeth, H. C., Tamime, A. Y. (1981). Yogurt: Nutritive and therapeutic aspects. Journal of Food Protection, 44(1), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devendra, C. (2001). Small ruminants’ imperatives for productivity enhancement, improved livelihoods, and rural growth—a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 14(10), 1483–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domonkos, A., Greiner, E. (2009). A kiskérődzők teje a felnőttek táplálkozásában és a gyógy élelmezésben. In: S. Kukovics (ed.), A tej szerepe a humán táplálkozásban (pp. 465–481). Budapest: Melánia Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubeuf, J. P. (2010). Characteristics and diversity of the dairy goat production systems and industry around the world. Structural, market and organizational conditions for their development. Tecnol Ciênc Agric, 4, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenyvessy, J. (2009). A kiskérődzők tejének értékes tulajdonságai a fogyasztás és a feldolgozás szempontjából. In: S. Kukovics (ed.), A tej szerepe a humán táplálkozásban (pp. 417–424). Budapest: Melánia Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fevrier, C., Mourot, J., Jaguelin, Y., Mounier, A., & Lebreton, Y. (1993). Comparative digestive utilization of UHT goat and cow’s milk: nutritional effects of gelation-use of a swine model. Lait, 73, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddour, A., Najari, S., & Abdennebi, M. (2013). Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of yogurt produced from goat milk. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 12(24), 1700–1703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., Park, Y. W., Dixon, P. H., Gilmore, J. A., & Kindstedt, P. S. (2004). Relationship between the yield of cheese (Chevre) and chemical composition of goat milk. Small Ruminant Research, 52, 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenlein, G. F. W. (2001). Past, present and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research. Journal of Dairy Science, 84(9), 2097–2445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenlein, G. F. W. (2004). Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminants Research, 51, 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenlein, G. F. W. (2017). Why does goat milk matter?–A review. Nutrition & Food Science International Journal, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/NFSIJ.2017.02.555594

  • Harren, R. V. (1994). The science of animal agriculture. Albany, New York: Delmar Publisher Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenlein, G. F. W., Caccese, R. (1984). Goat milk versus cow milk. In: G.F.W. Haenlein, D. Ace (Eds.), Extension goat handbook. Fact sheet E-1. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Host, A., Husby, S., & Osterballe, O. (1988). A prospective study of cow’s milk allergy in exclusively breast-fed infants. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 77, 663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture. (2017). A kiskérődző ágazat stratégiai fejlesztése 2015. In: S. Kukovics A (Ed.), kiskérődző szektor jelene és jövője—A Juh Terméktanács 25 éve tükrében (pp. 159–172).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandal, J. M. (1996). Comparative aspects of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research, 22, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, R. (1980). Composition and characteristics of goat milk- review. Journal of Dairy Science., 63, 1605–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joon, R., Mishra, S. K., Brar, G. S., Singh, P. K., Panwar, H. (2017). Instrumental texture and syneresis analysis of yogurt prepared from goat and cow milk. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 6(7), 971–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavas, G., Uysal, H., Kilic, S., Akbulut, N., & Kesenkas, H. (2003). Some properties of yogurt produced from goat milk and cow-goat milk mixtures by different fortification methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(23), 1936–1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kris, H. K. (2008). The history of the domestication of goats. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Aliaga, I., Alférez, M. J. M., Barrionuevo, M. J., Nestares, T., Sanz-Sampelayo, M. R., & Campos, M. S. (2003). Study of nutritive utilization of protein and magnesium in rats with resection of the distal small intestine. The beneficial effect of goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 2958–2966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangia, N. P., Murgia, M. A., Fancello, F., Nudda, A., & Deiana, P. (2014). Influence of myrtle juice and syrup on microbiological, physicochemical and sensory features of goat’s milk yogurt made with indigenous starter culture. Journal Microbial Biochemical Technology, 6, 370–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Fehr, P., & Boyazogly, J. (1999). Present status and future outlook of the small ruminant sector. Small Ruminant Research, 34, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Fehr, P. (2003). Strategy for goat farming in the 21st century. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowlem, A. (2005). Marketing goat dairy products in the UK. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 207–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olalla, M., Ruiz-López, M. D., Navarro, M., Artacho, R., Cabrera, C., Gimėnez, R., et al. (2009). Nitrogen fractions of Andalusian goat milk compared to similar types of commercial milk. Food Chemistry, 113, 835–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, A. J., & Ghodke, K. M. (2007). Goat and sheep milk products other than cheeses and yogurt. Small Ruminant Research, 68, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. W. (1994). Hypo-allergenic and therapeutic significance of goat milk. Small Ruminant Research, 14, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. W. (2010). Goat milk products: Quality, composition, processing, and marketing. In: W. G. Pond & N. Bell encyclopedia of animal science (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–5) Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. W., & Chukwu, H. I. (1989). Trace mineral concentrations in goat milk from French-Alpine and Anglo-Nubian breeds during the first 5 months of lactation. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, C. (1996). Improving goat production in the tropics. Oxfam/FARM-Africa. pp. 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirisi, A., Lauret, A., & Dubeuf, J. P. (2007). Basic and incentive payments for goat and sheep milk to quality. Small Ruminant Research, 68, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polgár, M. (2009). Vane alternatív tejtáplálás a tehéntej-allergiás csecsemők és gyermekek számára? In: S. Kukovics (Ed.) A tej szerepe a humán táplálkozásban (pp. 437–443) Budapest: Melánia Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos Morales, E., De la Torre Adarve, G., Carmona López, F. D., Gil Extremera, F., Sanz Sampelayo, M. R., & Boza, J. (2005). Nutritional value of goat and cow milk protein. Options Méditerranéennes, 67, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slacanac, V., Hardi, J., Lucan, M., Komlenic, D. K., Krstanovic, V., & Jukic, M. (2011). The concentration of nutritionally important minerals in Croatian goat and cow milk and some dairy products made of these. Croatian Journal Food Science Technology, 3(1), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szigeti, O. (2004). Kecsketejből készült élelmiszerek táplálkozási előnyei és fogyasztói szokásai. Élelmiszer, Táplálkozás és Marketing, 1(1–2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szigeti, O., Szente, V., & Szakály, Z. (2005). Fogyasztói megítélés a kecsketej termékek piacán. Élelmiszer Táplálkozás és Marketing, 2(1–2), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szigeti, O., Szente, V., Szűcs, A., & Szendrő, K. (2014). Kecsketej termékek fogyasztói megítélése. Élelmiszer Táplálkozás és Marketing, 10(2), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamime, A. Y., & Deeth, H. C. (1980). Yogurt: Technology and biochemistry. Journal of Food -Protection, 43(12), 939–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taitz, L. S., & Armitage, B. L. (1984). Goat’s milk for infants and children. British Medical Journal, 288, 428–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. K. 2010. Livestock production: Recent trends and future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2853–2867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachoo, N. (2002). Yogurt: The fermented milk. Songklanakarin Journal Science Technology, 24(4), 727–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yangilar, F. (2013). As a potentially functional food: Goat’s milk and products. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 1(4), 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, F. J. (1982). Clinical nutrition and dietetics. Lexington, Massachusetts D.C, USA: Callamore Press, Health & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenebe, T., Ahmed, N., Kabeta, T., & Kebede, G. (2014). Review on medicinal and nutritional values of goat milk. Academic Journal of Nutrition, 3(3), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerathilake, W. A. D. V., Rasika, D. M. D., Ruwanmali, J. K. U., & Munasinghe, M. A. D. D. (2014). The evolution, processing, varieties and health benefits of yogurt. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO-FAO. (2011). Codex Alimentarius. Milk and milk products (2nd ed.). https://www.fao.org/3/i2085e/i2085e00.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zsolt Csapó .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Csapó, Z., Péntek, Á., Riskó, T.C. (2020). Sensory Evaluation and Acceptance of Goat Yogurts in Comparison with Cow yogurts—An Empirical Study. In: Fotea, S., Fotea, I., Văduva, S. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities to Develop Organizations Through Creativity, Technology and Ethics. GSMAC 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43449-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics