Abstract
In today’s manufacturing industry surface roughness is highly concerned. Poor surface quality leads to many problems like malfunctioning, large amount of wear, low life span. In case of fluid flow through pipes poor surface quality causes higher friction loss. Lots of efforts were made to improve the surface quality of a product but by conventional processes high level of surface finish are not achievable. By means of hybrid technologies it is feasible to achieve surface roughness up to nano level. The most controlled and effective way to produce surface roughness up to nano meter by using magneto rheological fluid (MRF). With the help of MRF high grade surface finish can achieve with convenient tolerances and without ruining the surface contour. Working principle and their advantages of MR fluid and rotational magneto-rheological abrasive flow finishing is discussed in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Golini D, Kordonski WI, Dumas P, Hogan SJ (1999) Magnetorheological finishing (MRF) in commercial precision optics manufacturing. In: Optical manufacturing and testing III, vol 3782. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 80–92
Golini D (1999) Precision optics manufacturing using magnetorheological finishing (MRF). In: Optical fabrication and testing, vol 3739. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 78–86
Arrasmith SR, Kozhinova IA, Gregg LL, Shorey AB, Romanofsky HJ, Jacobs SD, Golini D, Kordonski WI, Hogan SJ, Dumas P (1999) Details of the polishing spot in magnetorheological finishing (MRF). In: Optical manufacturing and testing III, vol 3782. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 92–101
Menapace J, Penetrante B, Miller P, Parham T, Nichols M, Peterson J, Golini D (2002) Combined advanced finishing and uv-laser conditioning for producing uv-damage-resistant fused silica optics. In: Optical fabrication and testing, page OMB4. Optical Society of America
Harris DC (2011) History of magnetorheological finishing. In: Window and dome technologies and materials XII, vol 8016. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 80160 N
Rabinow J (1948) The magnetic fluid clutch. Electr Eng 67(12):1167
Menapace JA, Dixit SN, Génin FY, Brocious WF (2004) Magnetorheological finishing for imprinting continuous-phase plate structures onto optical surfaces. In: Laser-induced damage in optical materials: 2003, vol 5273. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 220–231
Yang G, Spencer BF Jr, Carlson DJ, Sain MK (2002) Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modeling and dynamic performance considerations. Eng Struct 24(3):309–323
Ginder JM, Davis CL, Elie LD. Rheology of magnetorheological fluids: models and measurements. Int J Modern Phys B 10(23–24):3293–3303
Seok JW, Lee SO, Jang K-I, Min B-K, Lee SJ (2009) Tribological properties of a magnetorheological (MR) fluid in a finishing process. Tribol Trans 52(4):460–469
Jha S, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1019–1029
Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2011) The out-of-roundness of the internal surfaces of stainless steel tubes finished by the rotational-magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 26(8):1073–1084
Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2009) Parametric study of process parameters and characterization of surface texture using rotational-magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (R-MRAFF) process. In: ASME 2009 international manufacturing science and engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 251–260
Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2010) Nano-finishing of stainless-steel tubesusing rotational magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Mach Sci Technol 14(3):365–389
Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2012) Computational fluid dynamics simulation and experimental investigations into the magnetic-field-assisted nano-finishing process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 226(7):1143–1158
Gedik E, Kurt H, Recebli Z, Balan C (2012) Two dimensional CFD simulation of magnetorheological fluid between two fixed parallel plates applied external magnetic field. Comput Fluids 63:128–134
Rajput AS, Prasad D, Mondal AK, Bose D (2019) 2D Computational fluid dynamics analysis into rotational magnetorheological abrasive flow. Advances in materials and manufacturing engineering: proceedings of ICAMME, p 67
Chhabra RP, Francis Richardson J (2011) Non-Newtonian flow and applied rheology: engineering applications. Butterworth-Heinemann
Nagdeve Leeladhar, Sidpara Ajay, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2018) On the effect of relative size of magnetic particles and abrasive particles in MR fluid-based finishing process. Mach Sci Technol 22(3):493–506
Jolly MR, David Carlson J, Munoz BC (1996) A model of the behaviour of magnetorheological materials. Smart Mater Struct 5(5):607
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mondal, A.K., Rajput, A.S., Prasad, D., Bose, D. (2020). Magnetic Field Assisted Finishing Processes. In: Das, S., Kibria, G., Doloi, B., Bhattacharyya, B. (eds) Advances in Abrasive Based Machining and Finishing Processes. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43312-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43312-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43311-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43312-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)