Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Growth and Development Policy

Abstract

The definitions of entrepreneurship might vary, but it is a fact that a clear conceptual framework which correlates entrepreneurship with the economic outcome does not exist. One possible explanation—this chapter suggests—derives from neoclassical theory, which does not consider entrepreneurship as a separate variable of its models. At the same time, the chapter presents entrepreneurial micro-foundation on growth, in terms of the observation of the cognitive process of entrepreneurs seeking growth and in terms of the process of business development. Finally, an important concept for entrepreneurship—the business opportunity—is examined alongside with its sources and the process of controlling it, on the way to seeking a competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Hofstede, de Hilal, Malvezzi, Tanure, and Vinken (2010), the dimensions that express organizational culture are,

    • Process-oriented versus goal-oriented: it is closely associated with the effectiveness of the organization. In process-oriented cultures, as opposed to goal-oriented cultures, people avoid risk and uncertainty situations and spend only a small portion of their potential at work. A key feature is the way the work has to be done, while individuals are disinclined to face change and they love routine.

    • Employee-oriented versus job-oriented: it reflects the management philosophy of an organization. In employee-oriented cultures, individuals feel that the organization takes their personal problems into account, takes care of the staff—even if this is to the detriment of job objectives—and that important decisions of the organization are made by teams or committees.

    • Local-oriented versus professional-oriented: this dimension shows the contrast between units whose employees largely obtain their identity from the organization (local) with units in which individuals are identified with the type of work (occupation). In local-oriented cultures, by contrast to occupation-oriented ones, individuals feel that the norms of the organization cover their behaviour both at home and at the workplace and that, when it hired them, the company took into account their social and family background along with their professional skills. Furthermore, people in local-oriented cultures are short-term oriented because they believe that the organization will serve its long-term vision over themselves.

    • Open versus closed system: this refers to the accessibility of an organization. In the culture of open systems, individuals consider all members of the organization open to new entrants and to those outside the organization and consider that everyone could join the organization. Therefore, new employees are characterized by adaptability. On the contrary, in the culture of closed systems, the organization is closed and secretive.

    • Loose versus tight control: this refers to the degree of the organization’s internal structure. In loose control cultures, no one considers the cost, and meeting times are kept only approximately.

    • Normative-oriented versus pragmatic-oriented: this refers to the extent to which the organization is customer-oriented or not. Pragmatic cultures are market-oriented. There is a strong emphasis on meeting customer needs, results are more important than sound procedures and a pragmatic, rather than dogmatic, approach to business ethics prevails. In regulatory cultures, people perceive their work in relation to the outside world as the application of inviolable rules.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, M. M. (2002). How Does Knowledge Flow? Interfirm Patterns in the Semiconductor Industry. In C. W. Choo & N. Bontis (Eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp. 537–553). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Sourav, R. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1969). The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non-market Allocation. In U.S. Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress, 1st Session (Ed.), The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PBB-System (pp. 47–64). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2007). Behavioral and Cognitive Factors in Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the Active Element in New Venture Creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1993). Macroeconomics (4th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. (2007). Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. A., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The Missing Link: Knowledge Diffusion and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. C. (1982 [2003]). The Entrepreneur, An Economic Theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. C. (1995). Studies in the Economics of Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 16(4), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromie, S. (2000). Assessing Entrepreneurial Inclinations: Some Approaches and Empirical Evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(1), 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Stiglitz, J. (1980). Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D. Economic Journal, 90(358), 266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2015). Structural and Relational Interdependence and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Internal Knowledge-Sharing. International Small Business Journal, 33(5), 514–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. (1997). The Influene of the Management Team’s International Experience on the Internationalization Behaviours of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 807–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification: Entrepreneurial Alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2004). The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New Venture Growth: A Review and Extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2011). The Cognitive Perspective in Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Choi, D. (2011). Examining Entrepreneurial Cognition: An Occupational Analysis of Balanced Linear and Nonlinear Thinking and Entrepreneurship Success. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 438–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G. E., & Shrader, R. C. (1998). Successful Entrepreneurs’ Insights into Opportunity Recognition, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2008). Cognition in Organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 387–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., de Hilal, A. V. G., Malvezzi, S., Tanure, B., & Vinken, H. (2010). Comparing Regional Cultures Within a Country: Lessons from Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109359696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoselitz, B. (1957). Non-Economic Factors in Economic Development. American Economic Review, 47(2), 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. (1991). Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs Versus Executives: Sources, Interests, and General Alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, L. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, L. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Amit, R., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Entrepreneurship and Firm Formation Across Countries. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), International Differences in Entrepreneurship (pp. 129–158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koryak, O., Mole, K. F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J. C., Ucbasaran, D., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial Leadership, Capabilities and Firm Growth. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, C., & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Strategy and Small Firm Performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and Development. American Economic Review, 58(2), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Kegler, C. (2000). Evaluating the Small Business Innovation Research program: A Literature Review. In C. W. Wessner (Ed.), The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative (pp. 307–324). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38(4), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1978). On the Size Distribution of Business Firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Person-Entrepreneurship Fit: Why Some People Are More Successful as Entrepreneurs than Others. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., Mcdougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2002). Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis, P. E., & Konstantakopoulou, D. (2015). Uncertainty in the Entrepreneurial Decision Making: The Competitive Advantage of Strategic Creativity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, C. M. (1996). Determinants of Successful Entrepreneurship. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817 [1951]). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In P. Sraffa (Ed.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, J. A. (1989). Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 721–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1954 [1982]). History of Economic Analysis. London: Allan and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776 [1981]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works of Adam Smith, 2. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltow, J. H. (1968). The Entrepreneur in Economic History. American Economic Review, 58(2), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J. A. (1999). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. (2001). Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twaalfhoven, B., & Muzyka, D. F. (1997). Doing Business in the Wild East. In S. Birley & D. F. Muzyka (Eds.), Mastering Enterprise (pp. 199–205). London: FT Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rotmans, J. (2002). Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modeling. Climatic Change, 54(1–2), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2003). Entrepreneurship and Leadership: Common Trends and Common Threads. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: An Editor’s Perspective. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K. H. (1996). New Venture Experience – Cases Text and Exercises. Seattle: Vector Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., Sluijs, J. P., van der Asselt, M. B. A., van Janssen, P., et al. (2003). Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support. Integrated Assessment, 4(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2009). Information Search and Opportunity Identification: The Importance of Prior Business Ownership Experience. International Small Business Journal, 27(5), 659–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., & Stigliani, I. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Growth. International Small Business Journal, 31(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612467359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zichella, G. (2014). Entrepreneurial Cognition When Faced with Risk and Uncertainty: Methodological Reflections. Paper presented at the DRUID Academy Conference. Rebild, Aalborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis E. Petrakis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrakis, P.E., Valsamis, D.G., Kafka, K.I. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. In: Economic Growth and Development Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43181-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43181-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43180-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43181-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics