The Post-truth World Order



This chapter posits the post-truth condition as a phenomenon with a global reach causing significant geopolitical effects, and it locates its discussion within the academic debate on cultural and political globalization. The epistemic crisis ushered in by postmodern relativism is discussed in the chapter as being inherently related to the trust crisis suffered by gatekeepers and truth-arbiters of twentieth-century modernity, such as mainstream media and mass parties. Changes in the political economy of media, the hybridization of entertainment and information and the rise of populist politics are also regarded as conducive to the current post-truth condition. The broader state of crisis of the Western liberal democratic model and of neoliberal market capitalism are identified as the conceptual perimeters within which post-truth acts as a catalyst of ideological tensions and geopolitical power struggles.


Post-truth Disinformation Misinformation Fake news Postmodernism Propaganda Populism 


  1. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2–3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the republic. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  3. Baym, G., & Jones, J. P. (2012). News parody in global perspective. Popular Communication, 10(1–2), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benkler, J., et al. (2018). Network propaganda. Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berardi, F. (2017). Verità e simulazione. Alfabeta2.
  7. Corner, J., & Pels, D. (2003). Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Cosentino, G. (2017). L’era della post-verità: Media e populismi dalla Brexit a Trump. Reggio Emilia: Imprimatur.Google Scholar
  9. Cosentino, G., & Doyle, W. (2010). Silvio Berlusconi: The one-man brand. In M. Aronczyk & D. Powers (Eds.), Blowing up the brand: Critical perspectives on promotional culture. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post-truth: The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dean, J. (2010). The real internet. International Journal of Zizek Studies, 4(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  12. DiResta, D., et al. (2018). The tactics & tropes of the internet research agency. New Knowledge.Google Scholar
  13. Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost: The Public, 25(3), 298–314.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1976/2000). Truth and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 111–133). New York, NY: New Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformations of the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of post truth, post politics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(2), 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harsin, J. (2018). Post-truth and critical communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of Populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series).Google Scholar
  22. Judis, J. (2016). The populist explosion. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
  23. Kakutani, M. (2018). The death of truth. New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
  24. Kalpokas, I. (2018). A political theory of post-truth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Kazin, M. (2016). Trump and American populism: Old whine, new bottles. Foreign Affairs.
  26. Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation on-line. Data and Society Research Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Mattelart, A. (2002). An archaeology of the global era: Constructing a belief. Media, Culture and Society, 24(5), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. McNair, B. (2008). The internet and the changing global media environment. In A. Chadwick & P. Howard (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 217–229). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies. Alresford: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. Pieterse, J. N. (2003). Globalization and culture: Global mélange. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Pomerantsev, P., & Weiss M. (2014). The menace of unreality: How the Kremlin weaponizes information, culture and money. New York: The Interpreter.Google Scholar
  36. Revelli, M. (2019). La politica senza politica. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  37. Salgado, S. (2018). Online media impact on politics: Views on post-truth politics and post-postmodernism. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 317–331.
  38. Susca, V., & De Kerckhove, D. (2008). Transpolitica. Nuovi rapporti di potere e sapere. Milan: Apogeo.Google Scholar
  39. Tuathail, G., et al. (2006). The geopolitics reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Tufecki, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Anti-social media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Van Herpen, M. (2016). Putin’s propaganda machine soft power and Russian foreign policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Waisbord, S. (2018). Why populism is troubling for democratic communication. Communication Culture & Critique, 11, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woolley, S., & Howard, P. (2018). Computational propaganda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BaabdaLebanon

Personalised recommendations