Skip to main content

Applying Dynamic Performance Management to Foster Collaborative Governance in Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enabling Collaborative Governance through Systems Modeling Methods

Part of the book series: System Dynamics for Performance Management & Governance ((SDPM,volume 4))

Abstract

Higher education is characterized by growing complexity and uncertainty, which highlight how wicked issues cannot be addressed by one organization acting alone. A collaborative governance approach is here proposed to tackle these issues. Such a perspective has been implemented widely, from public services design and delivery to infrastructure development and environmental protection. Although higher education is not less critical than the above areas, less attention has been paid to collaborative governance in this field. To foster collaborative governance in higher education, based on a literature review, we develop a conceptual framework using the dynamic performance management approach. This study aims to contribute to the literature and to support decision-makers to implement collaborative governance strategies to achieve the three university missions. Future research is required to test the validity of the proposed framework. The use of a system dynamics simulation model could offer an effective environment to simulate alternative collaborative governance strategies in higher education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Peterson, P. M. (1999). Higher education in the 21st century: Global challenge and national response. IIE research report no. 29. Annapolis: IIE Books, Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., & Magalhaes, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In A. Amaral, G. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler, L. B. (2016). Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C. (2016). Dynamic performance management. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 1, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson J., Crosby B.C., & Bloomberg L.(2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross-Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A., & Moote, M. A. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16(5), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (2004). The rise of a triple helix culture: Innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for a change. In Definitions, models, roles and a guide for collaborative process. Minneapolis, MN: Hubert Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R. (2008). Collaboration in education. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia (pp. 67–73). Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. J. (2003). Higher education governance as a key policy issue in the 21st century. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larédo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejlgaard, N., & Ryan, T. K. (2017). Patterns of third mission engagement among scientists and engineers. Research Evaluation, 26(4), 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, J., & Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaini, R. M., Pavlov, O. V., Saeed, K., Radzicki, M. J., Hoffman, A. H., & Tichenor, K. R. (2017). Let’s talk change in a university: a simple model for addressing a complex agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(3), 250–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Yan H, Qi J and Bivona E. (2018). Framing alternative policies to achieve university mission: A case study of a Chinese regional university. In 36th International System Dynamics Conference, Reykjavík, Iceland, August 6–10, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by Industry-University-Research Innovation Fund of Science and Technology Development Center of Ministry of Education of China—Wisdom Education Program “Cloud Computing-Driven Educational Reform and Innovation: A Case Study of Intelligent Science and Management Major,” and the Key Teaching Reform Program of Shanghai Education Commission “Construction of New Courses in Business Schools.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Bivona .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, Z., Bivona, E., Qi, J., Yan, H. (2020). Applying Dynamic Performance Management to Foster Collaborative Governance in Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework. In: Bianchi, C., Luna-Reyes, L.F., Rich, E. (eds) Enabling Collaborative Governance through Systems Modeling Methods. System Dynamics for Performance Management & Governance, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics