Skip to main content

Mass Spectrometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Principles of Forensic Toxicology
  • 3570 Accesses

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is the most widely used identification technique in forensic toxicology. In a mass spectrometry, the sample, usually following chromatographic separation, enters the mass spectrometer through an inlet device. Once inside the ion source, the sample components are ionized and selectively monitored by the mass analyzer. The ions that exit the mass analyzer enter the instrument’s detector. Common ionization techniques for gas chromatography-MS are the electron ionization, where significant fragmentation can occur, and the softer chemical ionization. Common liquid chromatography-MS ionization techniques are electrospray ionization, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, and collision-induced dissociation. The quadrupole, ion trap, and time of flight are common mass analyzers. Currently, multistage mass spectrometers have gained widespread use. Although an identification technique, MS coupled with its hyphenated chromatographic techniques is widely used in quantitative analysis as well.

Mass spectrometry (MS) was developed about 80 years ago and has since been applied in a wide variety of scientific disciplines. The applications of MS run the gamut from the elucidation of fundamental physical and chemical properties of substances to the study of large biological molecules. The technique has come into widespread use in the last several decades, largely because of the development of small, relatively inexpensive instruments that are easy to operate. Advances in computers and sophisticated software have reduced the need for training, because instruments can be controlled and data acquired with little analyst intervention. Moreover, various advances have made MS technology more usable for a wider variety of compounds in a diverse array of scientific endeavors, most recently in elucidating the nature of the genome and its encoded protein products. Since the previous edition of this book, the use of MS in forensic toxicology has begun to transition toward more applications that use liquid chromatography (LC), tandem MS (MS/MS), and time-of-flight (TOF) MS. The introduction of these techniques into forensic analysis promises to be an exciting area of advancement in the coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • ANSI/ASB 098: Standard for Mass Spectral Data Acceptance in Forensic Toxicology.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/ASB 113: Standard for Identification Criteria in Forensic Toxicology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain R, Fiegel C (1994) Chemical ionization and MS-MS technologies for benchtop ion trap GC-MS systems. Am Lab 26:44–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colby JM, Thoren KL, Lynch LL (2018) Suspect screening using LC-Qq-TOF is a useful tool for detecting drugs in biological samples. J Anal Toxicol 42(4):207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RB (ed) (1997) Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry fundamentals, instrumentation and applications. John Wiley, New York, 577 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard PW, Rode AJ, Rasmussen BS, Bjork MK, Petersen DI, Madsen KA, Gammelgaard B, Simonsen KW, Linnet K (2013) Quantitative analysis of 30 drugs in whole blood by SPE and UHPLC-TOF-MS. Forensic Sci Criminol 1(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hoffman E, Charette J, Stroobant V (1996) Mass spectrometry principles and applications. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Desiderio DM (ed) (1992) Mass spectrometry clinical and biomedical applications, vol 2. Plenum, New York, 269 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Desiderio DM (ed) (1992) Mass spectrometry clinical and biomedical applications, vol 1. Plenum Press, New York, 353 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Domin M, Cody R (2014) Ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habala L, Valentová J, Pechová I, Fuknová M, Devínsky F (2016) DART–LTQ ORBITRAP as an expedient tool for the identification of synthetic cannabinoids. Leg Med 20:27–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoja H, Marquet P, Verneuil B, Lotfi H, Penicaut B, Lachatre G (1997) Applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in analytical toxicology: A review. J Anal Toxicol 21:116–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson FG, Larsen BS, McEwen CN (1996) Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry: A practical guide. Academic Press, New York, 381 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppel C, Tenczer J (1995) Scope and limitations of a general unknown screening by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in acute poisoning. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 6:995–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu RH, Goldberger BA (eds) (1995) Handbook of workplace drug testing. AACC Press, Washington, DC, 380 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge E, Trobbiani S, Stockham P, Scott T, Kostakis C (2018) A validated method for the screening of 320 forensically significant compounds in blood by LC/QTOF, with simultaneous quantification of selected compounds. J Anal Toxicol 42(4):220–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirro V, Jarmusch AK, Vincenti M, Cooks RG (2015) Direct drug analysis from oral fluid using medical swab touch spray mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 861:47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkman OD (1996) Evaluating electron ionization mass spectral library search results. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 7:313–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson BA (1998) Atmospheric pressure ionization and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry – together at last. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 9:187–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu J, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z (2010) Paper spray for direct analysis of complex mixtures using mass spectrometry. Angewandte Chem 122(5):889–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The editors wish to acknowledge Dr. John Cody for prior contributions to the Mass Spectrometry chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn P. Vorce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vorce, S.P. (2020). Mass Spectrometry. In: Levine, B.S., KERRIGAN, S. (eds) Principles of Forensic Toxicology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42917-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics