Skip to main content

Invasive Alien Species – The Eradication or Use of Invasive Alien Species Under EU Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Law

Abstract

The EU adopted a Regulation striving to tackle one of the primary threats to biodiversity, namely Invasive Alien Species (“IAS”). The article provides an overview of the IAS Regulation and discusses the Union list, the listing criteria as well as the restrictions set forth. The concept of ecosystem services is addressed as it is newly introduced in an EU legislative act. Furthermore, the obligations to detect and eradicate IAS are outlined and the four “ways” to derogate from the eradication-obligation are analyzed taking into account the European Commission’s (“EC”) opinion. Additionally, the management provision, particularly commercial use, is reviewed. To determine an understanding of commercial use, the specific exceptions – permits granted for research, ex-situ conservation and scientific production and subsequent medicinal use as well as authorizations in exceptional cases for reasons of compelling public interest – are scrutinized. Subsequently, concrete categories of “compelling public interest“ are developed, relying on provisions under the Habitats and Water Framework Directives and case law by the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”).

This Article is based on Frommelt F (2018) Doctoral Thesis “Invasive Alien Species – A Study on the Legal Framework dealing with Invasive Alien Species”. Vienna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Any provision in this article without explicit reference to a legal act refers to the IAS Regulation.

References

  • Apfelbacher, D., Adenauer, U., & Iven, K. (1999). Das zweite Gesetz zur Änderung des Bundesnaturschutzgesetzes. Natur und Recht, 1999, 63–78. [The second law amending the federal nature protection act].

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquiloni, L., Brusconi, S., Cecchinelli, E., Tricarico, E., Mazza, G., Paglianti, A., & Gherardi, F. (2010). Biological control of invasive populations of crayfish. Biological Invasions, 12(11), 3817–3824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R., Brander, L., Kuik, O., Papyrakis, E., & Bateman, I. (2013). A synthesis of approaches to assess and value ecosystem services in the EU in the context of TEEB. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/pdf/EU%20Valuation.pdf

  • Brunel, S., Fernández-Galiano, E., Genovesi, P., Heywood, V., Kueffer, C., & Richardson, D. (2013). Invasive alien species: A growing but neglected threat? In European Environmental Agency (Ed.), Late lessons from early warnings: Science, precaution, innovation (pp. 486–508). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgiel, S., Foote, G., Orellana, M., & Perrault, A. (2006). Invasive Alien species and trade. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://cleantrade.typepad.com/clean_trade/files/invasives_trade_paper_0106.pdf.

  • CBD COP. (2002). Decision VI/23 Aliens Species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. UNEP/CBD/COP6/20. The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD COP. (2010). Decision X/2 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 201–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2. Nagoya.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD SBSTTA. (2001). 6th Meeting Invasive Alien Species – Status, impacts and trends of alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats and species. UNECP/CBD/SBSTTA/6/INF/11. Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerri, J., Ferretti, M., & Tricarico, E. (2016). Are you aware of what you are doing? Asking Italian hunters about an invasive alien species they are introducing. Journal for Nature Conservation, 34, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini, F. (2010). The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(7), 1412–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2000). 13 April 2000 C-420/98 W.N., ECLI:EU:C:2000:209.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2011). 24 November 2011 C-404/09 Commission v Spain, ECLI:EU:C:2011:768.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2012a). 16 February 2012 C-182/10 Solvay et al, ECLI:EU:C:2012:82.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2012b). 11 September 2012 C-43/10 Nomarchiaki Aftodioikisi Aitoloakarnanias et al, ECLI:EU:C:2012:560.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2013). 11 April 2013 C-258/11 Sweetman et al, ECLI:EU:C:2013:220.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2014). 15 May 2014 C-521/12 Briels et al, ECLI:EU:C:2014:330.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2015). 1 July 2015 C-461/13 Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, ECLI:EU:C:2015:433.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2016a). 12 July 2016 C-387/15 and C-388/15 Orleans et al, ECLI:EU:C:2016:583.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2016b). 10 November 2016 C-504/14 Commission v Greece, ECLI:EU:C:2016:847.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2016c). 4 Mai 2016 C-346/14 Commission v Austria, ECLI:EU:C:2016:322.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2018). 25 July 2018 C-239/17 Gert Teglgaard, Fl½jstrupgÍrd I/S v F½devareministeriets Klagecenter, ECLI:EU:C:2018:597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Communities. (1993). Council Decision 93/626/EEC of 25 October 1993 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity OJ L 309, 13 December 1993, pp. 1–2. Retrieved April 30, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/1993/626/oj.

  • DAISIE. (2006). Species factsheet – Neogobius melanostomus. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesFactsheet.do?speciesId=50303

  • Davies, P. (2016). Alien invasive species: Is the EU’s strategy fit for purpose? In M. Bowman, P. Davies, & E. Goodwin (Eds.), Research handbook on biodiversity and law (pp. 184–218). Cheltenham, Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2000). Managing Natura 2000 Sites – The provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ directive 92/43/CEE. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2007). Guidance document on Article 6(4) of the ‘Habitats Directive’ 92/43/EEC – Clarification of the concepts of: alternative solutions, imperative reasons of overriding public interest, compensatory measures, overall coherence, opinion of the Commission. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/management/docs/art6/guidance_art6_4_en.pdf

  • EC. (2009). WFD Guidance Document No. 20 on Exemptions to the Environmental Objectives. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2013). Commission Staff Working Document – Impact Assessment. SWD(2013) 321 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2016a). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2104 of the European Parliament and of the Council OJ L 189, 14 July 2016, pp. 4–8. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2016/1141/oj

  • EC. (2016b). 7th Meeting of the Committee on invasive alien species. Ref. Ares(2016)6409358–14/11/2016. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2016c). Adoption of the first list of invasive lien species of Union concern – Questions & Answers. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/13_07_2016_QA_en.pdf

  • EC. (2017). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1263 of 12 July 2017 updating the list of invasive alien species of Union concern established by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council OJ L 182, 13 July 2017, pp. 37–39. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2017/1263/oj

  • EC. (2018). The natura 2000 biogeographical regions. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/biogeog_regions/

  • EC. (2019). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1262 of 25 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 to update the list of invasive alien species of Union concern OJ L 199, 26 July 2019, pp. 1–4. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/1262/oj

  • EU. (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992 pp. 7–50. Retrieved April 30, 1992, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/43/oj

  • EU. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy OJ L 327, 22.12.2000 pp. 1–73. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj

  • EU. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 326, 26 October 2012, 99. 47–390. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2012/oj

  • EU. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species OJ L 317, 4 November 2014, pp. 35–55. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1143/oj

  • Frommelt, F. (2018). 37 invasive gebietsfremde Arten – Verbote, Übergangsbestimmungen und Ausnahmen. In: Ennöckl D, Niederhuber M (eds) Umweltrecht Jahrbuch 17. NWV. Vienna Graz. 202–221 [37 invasive alien species – restrictions, transitional provisions and exceptions].

    Google Scholar 

  • FurEurope. (2018). Value chain. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: https://www.fureurope.eu/about-us/value-chain/

  • Gellermann, M. (2001). Natura 2000: Europäisches Habitatschutzrecht und seine Durchführung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. [Natura 2000: European habitat protection law and its implementation in the Federal Republic of Germany].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi, P., Carboneras, C., Vilà, M., & Walton, P. (2015). EU adopts innovative legislation on invasive species. Biological Invasions, 17(5), 1307–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPPC. (2016). ISPM 9 – Guidelines for pest eradication programmes. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: https://www.ippc.int/en/publications/611/.

  • Jans, J., & Vedder, H. (2012). European environmental law – After Lisbon. Groningen: European Law Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsanevakis, S., Wallentinus, I., Zenetos, A., Leppäkoski, E., Çinar, M., Oztürk, B., Grabowski, M., Golani, D., & Cardoso, A. (2014). Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity. Aquatic Invasions, 9(4), 391–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Pagad, S., Starfinger, U., Brink, P., & Shine, C. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) – Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistenkas, F. (2015). Sustainable development: New thoughts, new policy, new law? In V. Mauerhofer (Ed.), Legal aspects of sustainable development – Horizontal and sectorial policy issues (pp. 535–548). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köck, W. (2015). The EU regulation on invasive alien species. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 12(2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, L. (2011). EU Environmental Law. London: Sweet&Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucia, V. (2015). Competing narratives and complex genealogies: The ecosystem approach in international environmental law. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(1), 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V., & Laza, I. (2018). How do ecosystem services perform in enforceable law? Potentials and pitfalls within regional and national integration. Ecosystem Services, 29, 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA. (2003). Ecosystems and human Well-being – A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerbeek, K., Appels, L., Dewil, R., Calmeyn, A., Lemmens, P., Muys, B., & Hermy, M. (2015). Biomass of invasive plant species as a potential feedstock for bioenergy production. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 9(3), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N’Guyen, A., Hirsch, P., Adrian-Kalchhauser, I., & Burkhardt-Holm, P. (2016). Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers. Ambio, 45(3), 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard. (2010). Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 1219–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • OIE. (2016a). The terrestrial animal health code. Paris. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from: http://www.oie.int/en/international-standard-setting/terrestrial-code/access-online/

  • OIE. (2016b). The aquatic animal health code. Paris. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from: http://www.oie.int/en/international-standard-setting/aquatic-code/access-online/

  • Olszanska, A., Solarz, W., & Najberek, K. (2016). To kill or not to kill—Practitioners’ opinions on invasive alien species management as a step towards enhancing control of biological invasions. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otero, M., Cebrian, E., Francour, P., Galil, B., & Savini, D. (2013). Monitoring marine invasive species in Mediterranean marine protected areas (MPAs). Malaga: IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pürgy, E. (2005). Natura 2000 – Auswirkungen und Umsetzung im innerstaatlichen Recht. Forschungen aus Staat und Recht 142, Verlag Österreich, Wien [Natura 2000 – implications and implementation in national law].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsauer, U. (2000). Die Ausnahmeregelungen des Art.6 Abs.4 der FFH-Richtlinie. NuR:601–611 [The exceptions under Art 6(4) HD].

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, D., Wilhelm, E.-G., Roth, M., Scheinber, C., Nehring, S., & Winter, S. (2016). Evaluation system for management measures of invasive alien species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25, 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuenhoff, A., Mata, L., & Santos, R. (2006). The tetrasporophyte of Asparagopsis armata as a novel seaweed biofilter. Aquaculture, 252(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souty-Grosset, C., Anastácio, P., Aquiloni, L., Banha, F., Choquer, J., Chucholl, C., & Tricarico, E. (2016). The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe. Limnologica, 58, 78–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB. (2008). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity – An interim report. Cambridge: Banson Production.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity – Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouwborst, A. (2015). EU regulation 1143/2014 and the Bern convention. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 24(4), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

  • Vogl, C., & Hartl, A. (2003). Production and processing of organically grown fibre nettle (Urtica dioica L.) and its potential use in the natural textile industry. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18(3), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO. (1994). WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Annex 1A 1994, in force 1 January 1995, No 31874, 1867 U.N.T.S. pp 493–538. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201867/volume-1867-I-31874-English.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Frommelt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frommelt, F. (2020). Invasive Alien Species – The Eradication or Use of Invasive Alien Species Under EU Law. In: Mauerhofer, V., Rupo, D., Tarquinio, L. (eds) Sustainability and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42629-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42630-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics