Skip to main content

Political Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of Companies. Evidence from Novo Nordisk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Law

Abstract

In recent decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has received increasing attention by academics, civil society, media, and regulators. An emerging and less investigated version of CSR is Political CSR (PCSR). PCSR has been defined in a number of different ways and each definition has highlighted different aspects of this phenomenon. Several studies have highlighted that, under conditions of globalization, companies can assume a political role by influencing and cooperating with governments and institutions in changing the institutional environment in which they operate. This chapter specifically aims to analyze the political role taken on by corporations to fill regulatory gaps due to weak or insufficient social and environmental standards and norms, and thus to encourage socially and environmentally responsible conduct, by increasing governments’ and institutions’ interest in CSR and in its communication. The empirical approach used to explore PCSR is a case study. The focus of our research is on Novo Nordisk A/S, a multinational corporation recognized internationally for its early commitment to integrating sustainability into its culture and business practices. Using Scherer and Palazzo’s framework of five characteristics that define political CSR (i.e. governance model, self-regulation, responsibility beyond liability, moral legitimacy, and deliberative democracy), we demonstrate that Novo Nordisk exhibits those characteristics and well describes the changing role of corporations as political actors.

Our study contributes to the literature on political CSR, supplementing previous studies and taking part in the understanding of how and why a company can change its role as a political actor. Since the political conception of CSR is still in an early stage of development, our study contributes to operationalizing this concept with reference to a well-known company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 195–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Parliament. (2015). Act amending the Danish Financial Statements Act L 117. Retrieved April 2018, from https://www.ft.dk/RIpdf/samling/20141/lovforslag/L117/20141_L117_som_fremsat.pdf

  • Danish Parliament and Danish Minister for Economic and Business Affairs. (2008). Proposal for an Act amending Danish Financial Statements Act (Report on social responsibility for large businesses). Retrieved April 2018, from http://csrgov.dk/file/319999/proposal_report_on_social_resp_december_2008.pdf

  • Danish Parliament and Danish Ministry of Business and Growth. (2012). Act No. 546 of June 18 2012 on a mediation and complaints-handling institution for responsible business conduct. Retrieved April 2018, from https://businessconduct.dk/file/298159/act-on-mediation.pdf

  • Danish Parliament, Ministry of Environment and Energy, and Danish Environment Protection Agency. (1995). Act No. 403 of June 14 1995 amending the Environmental Protection Act (Green Accounts). Retrieved April 2018, from http://zpravodajstvi.ecn.cz/rtk/DK-green-account.htm

  • Dey, C., & Burns, J. (2010). Integrated reporting at Novo Nordisk. In A. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability: Practical insights. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Ribot, S. (2015). Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2011). Political corporate social responsibility: Between deliberation and radicalism. Retrieved April 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1904344

  • European Parliament and Council. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Official Journal L 330/1 of 15.11.2014. Retrieved April 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp. 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (1999). Sustainability reporting guidelines: Exposure draft for public comment and pilot testing. Retrieved April 2018, from http://cwm.unitar.org/publications/publications/cbl/prtr/pdf/cat5/sustain.pdf

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2000). GRI sustainability reporting guidelines (G.1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2012). GRI: Inside [and] out GRI’s: Sustainability report 2010/11. Retrieved April 2018, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/gri-sustainability-report-2010-2011.pdf

  • Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA). (1999). Accountability 1000 (AA1000) framework: Standard, guidelines and professional qualification.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2011). Discussion paper towards integrated reporting – Communicating value in the 21st century. Retrieved April 2018, from https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Discussion-Paper-Summary1.pdf

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013a). Consultation draft of the <IR> framework. Retrieved April 2018, from http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Consultation-Draft-of-the-InternationalIRFramework.pdf

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013b). The international <IR> framework. Retrieved April 2018, from https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf

  • Jonsson, J., Fisker, M., & Buhmann, K. (2016). From ‘do no harm’ to doing more good: Extending the UN framework to connect political CSR with business responsibilities for human rights (CBDS Working Paper Series Working Paper Nr. 26). Retrieved April 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2962360

  • Knudsen, J. S., & Brown, D. (2014). Why governments intervene: Exploring mixed motives for public policies on corporate social responsibility. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J., & Moon, J. (2013). The regulatory configurations of political CSR: International interactions of business, civil society and government. Retrieved April 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2234444

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, L., & Lettieri, E. (2009). CSR practices and corporate strategy: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 649–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2006). Novo Nordisk A/S: Integrating sustainability into business practice. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2009). Sustainable leadership: Management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novo Nordisk. (1994). Environmental report 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novo Nordisk. (1995). Environmental report 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novo Nordisk. (1996). Environmental report 1995. Retrieved April 2018, from https://www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/Denmark/HQ/sustainablebusiness/performance-on-tbl/more-about-how-we work/Integrated%20reporting/Environmental%20Report%201995.pdf

  • Novo Nordisk. (1999). Social report 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novo Nordisk. (2000). Putting values into action: Environmental and social report 1999. Retrieved April 2018, from https://www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/Denmark/HQ/sustainablebusiness/performance-on-tbl/more-about-how-we-work/Integrated%20reporting/Enviromental%20and%20Social%20Report%201999.pdf

  • Novo Nordisk. (2005). Annual Report 2004. Retrieved April 2018, from https://www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/Denmark/HQ/investors/irmaterial/annual_report/2005/20050129_Annual%20Report%202004_UK.pdf

  • Palacios, P., Pirson, M., & Bader, B. (2010). Novo Nordisk – Making a difference in diabetes treatment. In E. V. Kimakowitz, M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, C. Dierksmeier, & W. Amann (Eds.), Humanistic management in practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). The future of global corporate citizenship: Towards a new theory of the firm as a political actor. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2015). The corporation as a political actor–European and North American perspectives. European Management Journal, 33(1), 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Baumann-Pauly, D. (2007). The role of the TNC in the process of legalization: Insights from economics and CSR. In C. Brütsch & D. Lehmkuhl (Eds.), Law and legalization in transnational relations. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the US model business principles-why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions. MIR: Management International Review, 40, 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrempf-Stirling, J. (2018). State power: Rethinking the role of the state in political corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarquinio, L., & Rossi, A. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility reporting and external assurance: Evidence from Italian-listed companies. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 13(4), 398–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacheux, F. (1996). Méthodes qualitatives et recherche en gestion [Qualitative research methods for management sciences]. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R., & Seele, P. (2017). Uncommitted deliberation? Discussing regulatory gaps by comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a political CSR perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, C. (2016). “Political” corporate social responsibility in small-and medium-sized enterprises: A conceptual framework. Business & Society, 55(6), 792–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Applied social research methods series, 4th ed., Vol. 5). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanía Carolina Posadas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Posadas, S.C., Tarquinio, L., Rea, M.A. (2020). Political Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of Companies. Evidence from Novo Nordisk. In: Mauerhofer, V., Rupo, D., Tarquinio, L. (eds) Sustainability and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42629-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42630-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics