Skip to main content

Hayek: Postatomic Liberal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism ((PASTCL))

Abstract

Hayek’s anti-rationalism is founded upon a revival of Scottish Enlightenment skepticism combined with a compelling account of psychology that rejects a correspondence between our categories that impose order on experience and an external reality. Despite the resulting austere epistemic standpoint, Hayek argues humans can harness their capacity for pattern recognition to generate and sustain cooperative social orders through non-rational processes of trial and error. Institutions that allow this cooperative order to persist include centrally private property, voluntary contract and the rule of law. Hayek’s politics is less reliant on fundamental normative claims than those based on utopian ideals and is compatible with a cosmopolitan order made up of people with varied conceptions of morality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bruce Caldwell, Hayek’s Challenge an Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004); Peter J. Boettke, F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy and Social Philosophy, Great Thinkers in Economics (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).

  2. 2.

    Jeffrey Friedman, “Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The Epistemology and Politics of Ignorance,” Critical Review 17, no. 1–2 (2005): 1–58.

  3. 3.

    Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968).

  4. 4.

    Alasdair C. MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd ed (Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007); Charles Taylor, “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man,” The Review of Metaphysics 25, no. 1 (1971): 3–51.

  5. 5.

    Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge Classics (New York: Routledge, 2006).

  6. 6.

    Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, 1. paperback print (Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press, 1980).

  7. 7.

    Bernard d’Espagnat, “Quantum Physics and Reality,” Foundations of Physics 41, no. 11 (November 2011): 1703–16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9582-z; Henry Margenau, The Nature of Physical Reality (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1950).

  8. 8.

    Donald W. Livingston, “Hayek as Humean,” Critical Review 5, no. 2 (March 1991): 159–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819108443220

  9. 9.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1952); The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, 2d ed (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979).

  10. 10.

    Bruce Caldwell, “Some Reflections on F.A. Hayek’s The Sensory Order,” Journal of Bioeconomics 6, no. 3 (2004): 245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-004-5505-9

  11. 11.

    Joaquín M. Fuster, “Hayek in Today’s Cognitive Neuroscience,” in Advances in Austrian Economics, ed. Leslie Marsh, vol. 15 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011), 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2011)0000015006

  12. 12.

    Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith 1 (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1982); cf. Maria Pia Paganelli, “The Moralizing Role of Distance in Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments as Possible Praise of Commerce,” History of Political Economy 42, no. 3 (September 1, 2010): 425–41, https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2010-019

  13. 13.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, “Kinds of Order in Society,” New Individualist Review, 1981, http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2493/Hayek_KindsOrder1964.pdf

  14. 14.

    Tibor Machan, “Liberalism and Atomistic Individualism,” in Liberalism (Springer, 2000), 79–99, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0_5

  15. 15.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review 35, no. 4 (1945): 519–30.

  16. 16.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, Law, Legislation, and Liberty: Rules and Order, Reprinted 1993, vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 1973).

  17. 17.

    Israel M. Kirzner, “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach,” Journal of Economic Literature 35, no. 1 (1997): 60–85; Don Lavoie, “The Market as a Procedure for Discovery and Conveyance of Inarticulate Knowledge,” Comparative Economic Studies 28, no. 1 (1986): 1–19.

  18. 18.

    Vernon L Smith, “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics,” American Economic Review 93, no. 3 (June 2003): 465–508, https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322156954

  19. 19.

    Richard H Thaler and Cass R Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (London: Penguin Books, 2009).

  20. 20.

    Peter J. Boettke, W. Zachary Caceres, and Adam Martin, “Error Is Obvious, Coordination Is the Puzzle,” in Hayek and Behavioral Economics, ed. Roger Frantz and Robert Leeson (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137278159.0009

  21. 21.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents, Definitive ed, The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, v. 2 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

  22. 22.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. 2, the Mirage of Social Justice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976); Andrew Lister, “The ‘Mirage’ of Social Justice: Hayek Against (and For) Rawls,” Critical Review 25, no. 3–4 (2013): 409–444; Adam James Tebble, “Hayek and Social Justice: A Critique,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12, no. 4 (December 2009): 581–604, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903471343

  23. 23.

    Friedrich A. von Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago [Ill.]: University of Chicago Press, 1960); Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty; Joseph Raz, “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue,” in The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford University Press, 1979), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001

  24. 24.

    Bruce Caldwell and Leonidas Montes, “Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile,” The Review of Austrian Economics 28, no. 3 (September 2015): 261–309, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-014-0290-8

  25. 25.

    Aris Trantidis and Nick Cowen, “Hayek versus Trump: The Radical Right’s Road to Serfdom,” Polity (April 2020), https://doi.org/10.1086/707769

  26. 26.

    David M. Levy, “Robust Institutions,” The Review of Austrian Economics 15, no. 2–3 (2002): 131–142.

  27. 27.

    Peter J. Boettke and Peter T. Leeson, “Liberalism, Socialism, and Robust Political Economy,” Journal of Markets and Morality 7, no. 1 (2004): 99–111; Nick Cowen, “Why Be Robust? The Contribution of Market Process Theory to the Robust Political Economy Research Program,” in Interdisciplinary Studies of the Market Order: New Applications of Market Process Theory, ed. Peter J. Boettke, Christopher J. Coyne, and Virgil Storr (London: Rowman and Littlefield International Ltd, 2017), 63–85; Mark Pennington, Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy, New Thinking in Political Economy (Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2011).

  28. 28.

    Gerald F. Gaus, The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012); Gerald F. Gaus, “Self-Organizing Moral Systems: Beyond Social Contract Theory,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, August 29, 2017, 1470594X1771942, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X17719425; cf. Gerald F. Gaus and Keith Hankins, “Searching for the Ideal,” in Political Utopias, ed. Michael Weber and Kevin Vallier (Oxford University Press, 2017), 175–202.

  29. 29.

    Chandran Kukathas, The Liberal Archipelago (Oxford University Press, 2003), http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/019925754X.001.0001/acprof-9780199257546

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Cowen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cowen, N. (2020). Hayek: Postatomic Liberal. In: Callahan, G., McIntyre, K.B. (eds) Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42599-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics