Skip to main content

The “Common Ground” Dialogue: Working with Upwardly and Downwardly Divided Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practices of Dynamic Collaboration

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce the cognitive and social-emotional team cohesion (CSTC) triangle which aids understanding how a team is developmentally constituted in terms of its majority and minority. Adopting a bird’s-eye view of teams in general, we distinguish between two fundamentally different forms of collaboration: one that we call “upwardly,” and the other that we call “downwardly,” divided, where by “divided” we imply “between team majority and minority.” We demonstrate that these two dynamics assume a different form in each of the three We-Spaces we distinguish. Throughout, we offer advice on how to deal with the two contrasting dynamics in each of the three We-Spaces.

Team cohesion is a function of two nonbehavioral factors: (1) differences in the way in which team members together build knowledge (cognitive dimension; “tools”) and (2) differences in how they relate to themselves and others (social-emotional dimension; “stance”).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arora A (2019) Requisite agility unsymposium. https://requisiteagility.org/raunsymp/. Accessed Dec 2019

  • Blokdyk G (2018) Ishikawa diagram: a complete guide. 5STARCooks

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (2019) Kanban: the ultimate complete guide about agile project management with Kanban. Independently published

    Google Scholar 

  • De Visch J (2019a) Re-thinking game. A powerful tool for challenging and opening minds. Connect & Transform Press, Mechelen

    Google Scholar 

  • De Visch J (2019b) What can you do to foster your inner dialogue? A landscape of identity questions. Internal paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbeche L (2015) The agile organization: how to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson K (2019) Landscape of the mind - applying complexity in organisations. EMK complexity Group. http://emk-complexity.org/projects/landscape-of-the-mind.html

  • Laske O (2008) Measuring hidden dimensions of human systems: foundations of requisite organization (‘MHD volume 2’), 2nd edn. IDM Press, Glouccester, MA. http://www.interdevelopmentals.org/?page_id=1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Laske O (2015a) Dialectical thinking for integral leaders. Integral Publishers, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Laske O (2015b) Laske’s dialectical thought form framework (DTF) as a tool for creating integral collaborations: applying Bhaskar’s four moments of dialectic to reshaping cognitive development as a social practice. Integr Lead Rev 11(3):72

    Google Scholar 

  • Laske O (2017b) Improving management by design: novel tools for expanding and deepening the business model design space. https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=5026

  • Laske O (2018a) The vurdelja-laske dialectical thought form workbook. https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=6621

  • Laske O (2019k) Barriers to using CDF. https://interdevelopmentals.org/?p=6744

  • Middleton-Keller E (2011) Identifying the multi-dimensional problem-space & co-creating an enabling environment. In: Andrew T, Richardson KA (eds) Moving forward with complexity. Emergent Publications, Litchfield Park, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Possert B, Possert J (2019) Mindopeners vs. brainfrost a playful endeavor. http://www.mindopeners.net/. Accessed Jun 2019

  • Schein EH, Schein P (2018) Humble leadership: the power of relationships, openness, and trust. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisodia R, Wolfe J, Sheth D (2007) Firms of endearment: how world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Visch, J., Laske, O. (2020). The “Common Ground” Dialogue: Working with Upwardly and Downwardly Divided Teams. In: Practices of Dynamic Collaboration. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42549-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics