The power of weak communication refers to the ‘silent’ and less visible communicative practices that support social change. These practices are ‘weak’ because they are less ‘noisy’ than the mainstream types of communication sustaining social change campaigns (Tufte, Communication and Social Change: A Citizen Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017). They develop organically and are often fragmented, multipolar and based on personal, ‘weak’ relations between individuals and groups. Despite their ‘marginality’, they are powerful and relevant. Yet, they remain undertheorised. The concept offers a tool for legitimising the more local and unmediated communication and the different types of well-being that it enables. It is inspired by feminist scholars and ideas of ‘weak theorizing’, a type of theorising that is more local in its applicability but also more open to possibility (Sedgwick, Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
McAnany refers to two early proponents of this approach: Muhammad Yunus, an economist in Bangladesh; and Bill Drayton, a consultant for global firm McKinsey and official in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Bolino, M., Turnley, W., & Bloodgood, J. (2002). Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.
Brown, G., & Browne, K. (2011). Introduction: Sedgwick’s Geographies: Touching Space. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 121–131.
Browne, K. (2009). Women’s Separatist Spaces: Rethinking Spaces of Difference and Exclusion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(4), 541–556.
Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Continuum.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for ‘Other Worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632.
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the Social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716.
Lim, J. (2007). Queer critique and the politics of affect. In K. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics (pp. 53–68). Aldershot: Ashgate.
McAnany, E. G. (1980). The Role of Information in Communicating with the Rural Poor: Some Reflections. In A. Gumucio-Dragon, & T. Tufte (Eds.). (2006). Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings (pp. 200–210). South Orange: Communication for Social Change Consortium.
McAnany, E. G. (2012). Saving the World: A Brief History of Communication for Development and Social Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Morris, N. (2003). A Comparative Analysis of the Diffusion and Participatory Models in Development Communication. Communication Theory, 13(2), 225–248.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Naughton, L. (2014). Geographical Narratives of Social Capital. Telling Different Stories about the Socio-Economy with Context, Space, Place, Power and Agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913251348873.
Quarry, W., & Ramírez, R. (2009). Communication for Another Development: Listening Before Telling. New York: Zed Books.
Rodriguez, C. (2011). Citizen’s Media against Armed Conflict: Disrupting Violence in Columbia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Roelvink, M., & Carnegie, G. (2011). Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and the Imagining of Diverse Economic Possibilities’ in ‘Sedgwick’s Geographies: Touching Space. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 121–131.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1997). Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is About You. In E. K. Sedgwick (Ed.), Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction (pp. 1–37). Durham: Duke University Press.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham/London: Duke University Press..
Thomas, P. N., & van de Fliert, E. (2014). Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change: The Basis for a Renewal. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Touri, M. (2016). Development Communication in Alternative Food Networks: Empowering Indian Farmers through Market Relations. Journal of International Communication, 22(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2016.1175366.
Touri, M. (2018). Development and Communication in Trade Relations: New Synergies in Theory and Practice. Development in Practice, 28(3), 388–399.
Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and Social Change: A Citizen Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press..
White, S. (1994). The Concept of Participation: Transforming Rhetoric Reality’. In A. Gumucio-Dragon, & T. Tufte (Eds.). (2006). Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings (pp. 125–137). South Orange: Communication for Social Change Consortium.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Touri, M. (2020). The Power of Weak Communication. In: Tacchi, J., Tufte, T. (eds) Communicating for Change. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42513-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42512-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42513-5